COD07-01135
| Site Inspection | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 | 5/23/2007 3:19:21 PM | | FAIL |
|
|
|
|
COD07-00964
| Follow-Up Site Inspection | 5/14/2007 | 5/17/2007 | 5/23/2007 2:21:25 PM | A | DONE |
|
|
|
|
COD07-01136
| Site Inspection | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 | 5/22/2007 4:29:50 PM | | FAIL |
|
|
|
|
COD07-01132
| Site Inspection | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 | 5/22/2007 3:25:28 PM | | FAIL |
|
|
|
|
COD07-01141
| Site Inspection | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 | 5/18/2007 9:35:34 AM | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
COD07-01133
| Site Inspection | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 | 5/18/2007 9:18:50 AM | | FAIL |
|
|
|
|
COD07-01137
| Site Inspection | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 | 5/18/2007 9:16:35 AM | | FAIL |
|
|
|
|
BLD04-00941
| Code Occupancy Approval | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 11:50:23 AM | P | PASS |
|
|
SITE INSPECTION COMPLETE - i REVIEWED THE APPROVED PLANS AND CONDITIONS AND HAVE FOUND THEM TO BE IN SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE: I DID NOTE THE FOLLOWING CHANGES -
1. PLANS CALLED FOR A SOLID PLANTER ON THE MINI-COURTYARD BETWEEN THE CENTER BLDGS - THAT WAS CHANGED TO INDIVIDUAL VASE PLANTERS PER CONSULTATION WITH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT WHO HAD CONCERNS ABOUT ACCESS TO HOSE CONNECTIONS AND INTO THE BLDGS. THEMSELVES
2. PLANS FOR THE CENTER BLDGS CALLED FOR THREE [3] VERTICALLY STACKED WINDOWS MIRRORING THE INTERIOR STAIRWELLS - THAT HAS BEEN CHANGED TO TWO WINDOWS, WITH THE MIDDLE WINDOW REMOVED TO ACCOMODATE A REQUIRED A NECESSARY STRUCTURAL BEAM
3. ORIGINAL PLANS CALLED FOR ROUGH-HEWN [CEDAR?] SHINGLES - BLDR. INSTEAD USED HARDI-PLANK SHINGLES BECAUSE THEY ARE LONGER LASTING, EASIER TO MAINTAIN
4. THE MOST INTERIOR [CLOSEST TO CREEK] BLDGS DO NOT HAVE A STUCCO SKIRT AS THE PLANS CALLED FOR...INSTEAD THEY HAVE A STONE SKIRT WHICH IS IN KEEPING WITH THE STONE SKIRTS ON ALL THE OTHER BLDGS.
THESE CHANGES ARE ACCEPTABLE AND WITHIN THE PARAMETERS OF THE SCOPE AND INTENT OF THE APPROVED PLANS AND CONDITIONS - PASS/CASE CLOSED
|
|
BLD04-00945
| Code Occupancy Approval | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 11:49:45 AM | P | PASS |
|
|
SITE INSPECTION COMPLETE - i REVIEWED THE APPROVED PLANS AND CONDITIONS AND HAVE FOUND THEM TO BE IN SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE: I DID NOTE THE FOLLOWING CHANGES -
1. PLANS CALLED FOR A SOLID PLANTER ON THE MINI-COURTYARD BETWEEN THE CENTER BLDGS - THAT WAS CHANGED TO INDIVIDUAL VASE PLANTERS PER CONSULTATION WITH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT WHO HAD CONCERNS ABOUT ACCESS TO HOSE CONNECTIONS AND INTO THE BLDGS. THEMSELVES
2. PLANS FOR THE CENTER BLDGS CALLED FOR THREE [3] VERTICALLY STACKED WINDOWS MIRRORING THE INTERIOR STAIRWELLS - THAT HAS BEEN CHANGED TO TWO WINDOWS, WITH THE MIDDLE WINDOW REMOVED TO ACCOMODATE A REQUIRED A NECESSARY STRUCTURAL BEAM
3. ORIGINAL PLANS CALLED FOR ROUGH-HEWN [CEDAR?] SHINGLES - BLDR. INSTEAD USED HARDI-PLANK SHINGLES BECAUSE THEY ARE LONGER LASTING, EASIER TO MAINTAIN
4. THE MOST INTERIOR [CLOSEST TO CREEK] BLDGS DO NOT HAVE A STUCCO SKIRT AS THE PLANS CALLED FOR...INSTEAD THEY HAVE A STONE SKIRT WHICH IS IN KEEPING WITH THE STONE SKIRTS ON ALL THE OTHER BLDGS.
THESE CHANGES ARE ACCEPTABLE AND WITHIN THE PARAMETERS OF THE SCOPE AND INTENT OF THE APPROVED PLANS AND CONDITIONS - PASS/CASE CLOSED
|
|
BLD04-00946
| Code Occupancy Approval | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 11:49:20 AM | P | PASS |
|
|
SITE INSPECTION COMPLETE - i REVIEWED THE APPROVED PLANS AND CONDITIONS AND HAVE FOUND THEM TO BE IN SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE: I DID NOTE THE FOLLOWING CHANGES -
1. PLANS CALLED FOR A SOLID PLANTER ON THE MINI-COURTYARD BETWEEN THE CENTER BLDGS - THAT WAS CHANGED TO INDIVIDUAL VASE PLANTERS PER CONSULTATION WITH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT WHO HAD CONCERNS ABOUT ACCESS TO HOSE CONNECTIONS AND INTO THE BLDGS. THEMSELVES
2. PLANS FOR THE CENTER BLDGS CALLED FOR THREE [3] VERTICALLY STACKED WINDOWS MIRRORING THE INTERIOR STAIRWELLS - THAT HAS BEEN CHANGED TO TWO WINDOWS, WITH THE MIDDLE WINDOW REMOVED TO ACCOMODATE A REQUIRED A NECESSARY STRUCTURAL BEAM
3. ORIGINAL PLANS CALLED FOR ROUGH-HEWN [CEDAR?] SHINGLES - BLDR. INSTEAD USED HARDI-PLANK SHINGLES BECAUSE THEY ARE LONGER LASTING, EASIER TO MAINTAIN
4. THE MOST INTERIOR [CLOSEST TO CREEK] BLDGS DO NOT HAVE A STUCCO SKIRT AS THE PLANS CALLED FOR...INSTEAD THEY HAVE A STONE SKIRT WHICH IS IN KEEPING WITH THE STONE SKIRTS ON ALL THE OTHER BLDGS.
THESE CHANGES ARE ACCEPTABLE AND WITHIN THE PARAMETERS OF THE SCOPE AND INTENT OF THE APPROVED PLANS AND CONDITIONS - PASS/CASE CLOSED
|
|
BLD04-00942
| Code Occupancy Approval | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 11:48:53 AM | P | PASS |
|
|
SITE INSPECTION COMPLETE - i REVIEWED THE APPROVED PLANS AND CONDITIONS AND HAVE FOUND THEM TO BE IN SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE: I DID NOTE THE FOLLOWING CHANGES -
1. PLANS CALLED FOR A SOLID PLANTER ON THE MINI-COURTYARD BETWEEN THE CENTER BLDGS - THAT WAS CHANGED TO INDIVIDUAL VASE PLANTERS PER CONSULTATION WITH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT WHO HAD CONCERNS ABOUT ACCESS TO HOSE CONNECTIONS AND INTO THE BLDGS. THEMSELVES
2. PLANS FOR THE CENTER BLDGS CALLED FOR THREE [3] VERTICALLY STACKED WINDOWS MIRRORING THE INTERIOR STAIRWELLS - THAT HAS BEEN CHANGED TO TWO WINDOWS, WITH THE MIDDLE WINDOW REMOVED TO ACCOMODATE A REQUIRED A NECESSARY STRUCTURAL BEAM
3. ORIGINAL PLANS CALLED FOR ROUGH-HEWN [CEDAR?] SHINGLES - BLDR. INSTEAD USED HARDI-PLANK SHINGLES BECAUSE THEY ARE LONGER LASTING, EASIER TO MAINTAIN
4. THE MOST INTERIOR [CLOSEST TO CREEK] BLDGS DO NOT HAVE A STUCCO SKIRT AS THE PLANS CALLED FOR...INSTEAD THEY HAVE A STONE SKIRT WHICH IS IN KEEPING WITH THE STONE SKIRTS ON ALL THE OTHER BLDGS.
THESE CHANGES ARE ACCEPTABLE AND WITHIN THE PARAMETERS OF THE SCOPE AND INTENT OF THE APPROVED PLANS AND CONDITIONS - PASS/CASE CLOSED
|
|
BLD04-00947
| Code Occupancy Approval | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 11:48:05 AM | P | PASS |
|
|
SITE INSPECTION COMPLETE - i REVIEWED THE APPROVED PLANS AND CONDITIONS AND HAVE FOUND THEM TO BE IN SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE: I DID NOTE THE FOLLOWING CHANGES -
1. PLANS CALLED FOR A SOLID PLANTER ON THE MINI-COURTYARD BETWEEN THE CENTER BLDGS - THAT WAS CHANGED TO INDIVIDUAL VASE PLANTERS PER CONSULTATION WITH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT WHO HAD CONCERNS ABOUT ACCESS TO HOSE CONNECTIONS AND INTO THE BLDGS. THEMSELVES
2. PLANS FOR THE CENTER BLDGS CALLED FOR THREE [3] VERTICALLY STACKED WINDOWS MIRRORING THE INTERIOR STAIRWELLS - THAT HAS BEEN CHANGED TO TWO WINDOWS, WITH THE MIDDLE WINDOW REMOVED TO ACCOMODATE A REQUIRED A NECESSARY STRUCTURAL BEAM
3. ORIGINAL PLANS CALLED FOR ROUGH-HEWN [CEDAR?] SHINGLES - BLDR. INSTEAD USED HARDI-PLANK SHINGLES BECAUSE THEY ARE LONGER LASTING, EASIER TO MAINTAIN
4. THE MOST INTERIOR [CLOSEST TO CREEK] BLDGS DO NOT HAVE A STUCCO SKIRT AS THE PLANS CALLED FOR...INSTEAD THEY HAVE A STONE SKIRT WHICH IS IN KEEPING WITH THE STONE SKIRTS ON ALL THE OTHER BLDGS.
THESE CHANGES ARE ACCEPTABLE AND WITHIN THE PARAMETERS OF THE SCOPE AND INTENT OF THE APPROVED PLANS AND CONDITIONS - PASS/CASE CLOSED
|
|
BLD04-00949
| Code Occupancy Approval | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 11:47:08 AM | P | PASS |
|
|
SITE INSPECTION COMPLETE - i REVIEWED THE APPROVED PLANS AND CONDITIONS AND HAVE FOUND THEM TO BE IN SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE: I DID NOTE THE FOLLOWING CHANGES -
1. PLANS CALLED FOR A SOLID PLANTER ON THE MINI-COURTYARD BETWEEN THE CENTER BLDGS - THAT WAS CHANGED TO INDIVIDUAL VASE PLANTERS PER CONSULTATION WITH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT WHO HAD CONCERNS ABOUT ACCESS TO HOSE CONNECTIONS AND INTO THE BLDGS. THEMSELVES
2. PLANS FOR THE CENTER BLDGS CALLED FOR THREE [3] VERTICALLY STACKED WINDOWS MIRRORING THE INTERIOR STAIRWELLS - THAT HAS BEEN CHANGED TO TWO WINDOWS, WITH THE MIDDLE WINDOW REMOVED TO ACCOMODATE A REQUIRED A NECESSARY STRUCTURAL BEAM
3. ORIGINAL PLANS CALLED FOR ROUGH-HEWN [CEDAR?] SHINGLES - BLDR. INSTEAD USED HARDI-PLANK SHINGLES BECAUSE THEY ARE LONGER LASTING, EASIER TO MAINTAIN
4. THE MOST INTERIOR [CLOSEST TO CREEK] BLDGS DO NOT HAVE A STUCCO SKIRT AS THE PLANS CALLED FOR...INSTEAD THEY HAVE A STONE SKIRT WHICH IS IN KEEPING WITH THE STONE SKIRTS ON ALL THE OTHER BLDGS.
THESE CHANGES ARE ACCEPTABLE AND WITHIN THE PARAMETERS OF THE SCOPE AND INTENT OF THE APPROVED PLANS AND CONDITIONS - PASS/CASE CLOSED
|
|
BLD04-00944
| Code Occupancy Approval | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 11:46:31 AM | P | PASS |
|
|
SITE INSPECTION COMPLETE - i REVIEWED THE APPROVED PLANS AND CONDITIONS AND HAVE FOUND THEM TO BE IN SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE: I DID NOTE THE FOLLOWING CHANGES -
1. PLANS CALLED FOR A SOLID PLANTER ON THE MINI-COURTYARD BETWEEN THE CENTER BLDGS - THAT WAS CHANGED TO INDIVIDUAL VASE PLANTERS PER CONSULTATION WITH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT WHO HAD CONCERNS ABOUT ACCESS TO HOSE CONNECTIONS AND INTO THE BLDGS. THEMSELVES
2. PLANS FOR THE CENTER BLDGS CALLED FOR THREE [3] VERTICALLY STACKED WINDOWS MIRRORING THE INTERIOR STAIRWELLS - THAT HAS BEEN CHANGED TO TWO WINDOWS, WITH THE MIDDLE WINDOW REMOVED TO ACCOMODATE A REQUIRED A NECESSARY STRUCTURAL BEAM
3. ORIGINAL PLANS CALLED FOR ROUGH-HEWN [CEDAR?] SHINGLES - BLDR. INSTEAD USED HARDI-PLANK SHINGLES BECAUSE THEY ARE LONGER LASTING, EASIER TO MAINTAIN
4. THE MOST INTERIOR [CLOSEST TO CREEK] BLDGS DO NOT HAVE A STUCCO SKIRT AS THE PLANS CALLED FOR...INSTEAD THEY HAVE A STONE SKIRT WHICH IS IN KEEPING WITH THE STONE SKIRTS ON ALL THE OTHER BLDGS.
THESE CHANGES ARE ACCEPTABLE AND WITHIN THE PARAMETERS OF THE SCOPE AND INTENT OF THE APPROVED PLANS AND CONDITIONS - PASS/CASE CLOSED
|
|
BLD04-00935
| Code Occupancy Approval | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 11:45:56 AM | P | PASS |
|
|
SITE INSPECTION COMPLETE - i REVIEWED THE APPROVED PLANS AND CONDITIONS AND HAVE FOUND THEM TO BE IN SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE: I DID NOTE THE FOLLOWING CHANGES -
1. PLANS CALLED FOR A SOLID PLANTER ON THE MINI-COURTYARD BETWEEN THE CENTER BLDGS - THAT WAS CHANGED TO INDIVIDUAL VASE PLANTERS PER CONSULTATION WITH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT WHO HAD CONCERNS ABOUT ACCESS TO HOSE CONNECTIONS AND INTO THE BLDGS. THEMSELVES
2. PLANS FOR THE CENTER BLDGS CALLED FOR THREE [3] VERTICALLY STACKED WINDOWS MIRRORING THE INTERIOR STAIRWELLS - THAT HAS BEEN CHANGED TO TWO WINDOWS, WITH THE MIDDLE WINDOW REMOVED TO ACCOMODATE A REQUIRED A NECESSARY STRUCTURAL BEAM
3. ORIGINAL PLANS CALLED FOR ROUGH-HEWN [CEDAR?] SHINGLES - BLDR. INSTEAD USED HARDI-PLANK SHINGLES BECAUSE THEY ARE LONGER LASTING, EASIER TO MAINTAIN
4. THE MOST INTERIOR [CLOSEST TO CREEK] BLDGS DO NOT HAVE A STUCCO SKIRT AS THE PLANS CALLED FOR...INSTEAD THEY HAVE A STONE SKIRT WHICH IS IN KEEPING WITH THE STONE SKIRTS ON ALL THE OTHER BLDGS.
THESE CHANGES ARE ACCEPTABLE AND WITHIN THE PARAMETERS OF THE SCOPE AND INTENT OF THE APPROVED PLANS AND CONDITIONS - PASS/CASE CLOSED
|
|
BLD04-00936
| Code Occupancy Approval | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 11:45:19 AM | P | PASS |
|
|
SITE INSPECTION COMPLETE - i REVIEWED THE APPROVED PLANS AND CONDITIONS AND HAVE FOUND THEM TO BE IN SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE: I DID NOTE THE FOLLOWING CHANGES -
1. PLANS CALLED FOR A SOLID PLANTER ON THE MINI-COURTYARD BETWEEN THE CENTER BLDGS - THAT WAS CHANGED TO INDIVIDUAL VASE PLANTERS PER CONSULTATION WITH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT WHO HAD CONCERNS ABOUT ACCESS TO HOSE CONNECTIONS AND INTO THE BLDGS. THEMSELVES
2. PLANS FOR THE CENTER BLDGS CALLED FOR THREE [3] VERTICALLY STACKED WINDOWS MIRRORING THE INTERIOR STAIRWELLS - THAT HAS BEEN CHANGED TO TWO WINDOWS, WITH THE MIDDLE WINDOW REMOVED TO ACCOMODATE A REQUIRED A NECESSARY STRUCTURAL BEAM
3. ORIGINAL PLANS CALLED FOR ROUGH-HEWN [CEDAR?] SHINGLES - BLDR. INSTEAD USED HARDI-PLANK SHINGLES BECAUSE THEY ARE LONGER LASTING, EASIER TO MAINTAIN
4. THE MOST INTERIOR [CLOSEST TO CREEK] BLDGS DO NOT HAVE A STUCCO SKIRT AS THE PLANS CALLED FOR...INSTEAD THEY HAVE A STONE SKIRT WHICH IS IN KEEPING WITH THE STONE SKIRTS ON ALL THE OTHER BLDGS.
THESE CHANGES ARE ACCEPTABLE AND WITHIN THE PARAMETERS OF THE SCOPE AND INTENT OF THE APPROVED PLANS AND CONDITIONS - PASS/CASE CLOSED
|
|
BLD04-00937
| Code Occupancy Approval | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 11:44:40 AM | P | PASS |
|
|
SITE INSPECTION COMPLETE - i REVIEWED THE APPROVED PLANS AND CONDITIONS AND HAVE FOUND THEM TO BE IN SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE: I DID NOTE THE FOLLOWING CHANGES -
1. PLANS CALLED FOR A SOLID PLANTER ON THE MINI-COURTYARD BETWEEN THE CENTER BLDGS - THAT WAS CHANGED TO INDIVIDUAL VASE PLANTERS PER CONSULTATION WITH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT WHO HAD CONCERNS ABOUT ACCESS TO HOSE CONNECTIONS AND INTO THE BLDGS. THEMSELVES
2. PLANS FOR THE CENTER BLDGS CALLED FOR THREE [3] VERTICALLY STACKED WINDOWS MIRRORING THE INTERIOR STAIRWELLS - THAT HAS BEEN CHANGED TO TWO WINDOWS, WITH THE MIDDLE WINDOW REMOVED TO ACCOMODATE A REQUIRED A NECESSARY STRUCTURAL BEAM
3. ORIGINAL PLANS CALLED FOR ROUGH-HEWN [CEDAR?] SHINGLES - BLDR. INSTEAD USED HARDI-PLANK SHINGLES BECAUSE THEY ARE LONGER LASTING, EASIER TO MAINTAIN
4. THE MOST INTERIOR [CLOSEST TO CREEK] BLDGS DO NOT HAVE A STUCCO SKIRT AS THE PLANS CALLED FOR...INSTEAD THEY HAVE A STONE SKIRT WHICH IS IN KEEPING WITH THE STONE SKIRTS ON ALL THE OTHER BLDGS.
THESE CHANGES ARE ACCEPTABLE AND WITHIN THE PARAMETERS OF THE SCOPE AND INTENT OF THE APPROVED PLANS AND CONDITIONS - PASS/CASE CLOSED
|
|
BLD04-02268
| Code Occupancy Approval | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 11:43:51 AM | P | PASS |
|
|
SITE INSPECTION COMPLETE - i REVIEWED THE APPROVED PLANS AND CONDITIONS AND HAVE FOUND THEM TO BE IN SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE: I DID NOTE THE FOLLOWING CHANGES -
1. PLANS CALLED FOR A SOLID PLANTER ON THE MINI-COURTYARD BETWEEN THE CENTER BLDGS - THAT WAS CHANGED TO INDIVIDUAL VASE PLANTERS PER CONSULTATION WITH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT WHO HAD CONCERNS ABOUT ACCESS TO HOSE CONNECTIONS AND INTO THE BLDGS. THEMSELVES
2. PLANS FOR THE CENTER BLDGS CALLED FOR THREE [3] VERTICALLY STACKED WINDOWS MIRRORING THE INTERIOR STAIRWELLS - THAT HAS BEEN CHANGED TO TWO WINDOWS, WITH THE MIDDLE WINDOW REMOVED TO ACCOMODATE A REQUIRED A NECESSARY STRUCTURAL BEAM
3. ORIGINAL PLANS CALLED FOR ROUGH-HEWN [CEDAR?] SHINGLES - BLDR. INSTEAD USED HARDI-PLANK SHINGLES BECAUSE THEY ARE LONGER LASTING, EASIER TO MAINTAIN
4. THE MOST INTERIOR [CLOSEST TO CREEK] BLDGS DO NOT HAVE A STUCCO SKIRT AS THE PLANS CALLED FOR...INSTEAD THEY HAVE A STONE SKIRT WHICH IS IN KEEPING WITH THE STONE SKIRTS ON ALL THE OTHER BLDGS.
THESE CHANGES ARE ACCEPTABLE AND WITHIN THE PARAMETERS OF THE SCOPE AND INTENT OF THE APPROVED PLANS AND CONDITIONS - PASS/CASE CLOSED
|
|
BLD04-00943
| Code Occupancy Approval | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 11:43:11 AM | P | PASS |
|
|
SITE INSPECTION COMPLETE - i REVIEWED THE APPROVED PLANS AND CONDITIONS AND HAVE FOUND THEM TO BE IN SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE: I DID NOTE THE FOLLOWING CHANGES -
1. PLANS CALLED FOR A SOLID PLANTER ON THE MINI-COURTYARD BETWEEN THE CENTER BLDGS - THAT WAS CHANGED TO INDIVIDUAL VASE PLANTERS PER CONSULTATION WITH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT WHO HAD CONCERNS ABOUT ACCESS TO HOSE CONNECTIONS AND INTO THE BLDGS. THEMSELVES
2. PLANS FOR THE CENTER BLDGS CALLED FOR THREE [3] VERTICALLY STACKED WINDOWS MIRRORING THE INTERIOR STAIRWELLS - THAT HAS BEEN CHANGED TO TWO WINDOWS, WITH THE MIDDLE WINDOW REMOVED TO ACCOMODATE A REQUIRED A NECESSARY STRUCTURAL BEAM
3. ORIGINAL PLANS CALLED FOR ROUGH-HEWN [CEDAR?] SHINGLES - BLDR. INSTEAD USED HARDI-PLANK SHINGLES BECAUSE THEY ARE LONGER LASTING, EASIER TO MAINTAIN
4. THE MOST INTERIOR [CLOSEST TO CREEK] BLDGS DO NOT HAVE A STUCCO SKIRT AS THE PLANS CALLED FOR...INSTEAD THEY HAVE A STONE SKIRT WHICH IS IN KEEPING WITH THE STONE SKIRTS ON ALL THE OTHER BLDGS.
THESE CHANGES ARE ACCEPTABLE AND WITHIN THE PARAMETERS OF THE SCOPE AND INTENT OF THE APPROVED PLANS AND CONDITIONS - PASS/CASE CLOSED
|
|
COD07-01097
| DOC - Permit Finaled | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 11:19:21 AM | P | PASS |
|
|
|
|
COD07-01101
| DOC - Permit Finaled | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 11:19:12 AM | P | PASS |
|
|
|
|
COD07-01102
| DOC - Permit Finaled | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 11:19:03 AM | P | PASS |
|
|
|
|
COD07-01098
| DOC - Permit Finaled | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 11:18:54 AM | P | PASS |
|
|
|
|
COD07-01103
| DOC - Permit Finaled | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 11:18:45 AM | P | PASS |
|
|
|
|
COD07-01104
| DOC - Permit Finaled | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 11:18:36 AM | P | PASS |
|
|
|
|
COD07-01100
| DOC - Permit Finaled | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 11:18:26 AM | P | PASS |
|
|
|
|
COD07-01093
| DOC - Permit Finaled | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 11:18:13 AM | P | PASS |
|
|
|
|
COD07-01094
| DOC - Permit Finaled | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 11:18:03 AM | P | PASS |
|
|
|
|
COD07-01095
| DOC - Permit Finaled | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 11:17:55 AM | P | PASS |
|
|
|
|
COD07-01096
| DOC - Permit Finaled | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 11:17:45 AM | P | PASS |
|
|
|
|
COD07-01099
| DOC - Permit Finaled | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 11:17:34 AM | P | PASS |
|
|
|
|
BLD06-02034
| Code Occupancy Approval | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 10:17:38 AM | P | PASS |
|
|
SITE INSPECTION COMPLETE - I FOUND THAT THE GARAGE HAS BEEN BUILT ACCORDING TO THE APPROVED PLANS - PASS
|
|
COD07-01080
| DOC - Permit Finaled | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 10:15:51 AM | P | PASS |
|
|
|
|
COD07-00537
| COD-Aging Inspection | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 8:22:35 AM | | PASS |
|
|
|
|
COD07-00537
| DOC - Permit Finaled | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 | 5/17/2007 8:20:46 AM | P | PASS |
|
|
|