Inspections for the day of: Wednesday, August 19, 2009.
Number of inspections: 6
Percentage of inspections complete: 100 %
Percentage of inspections not complete: 0 %
Contact Information
InspectorTroy Cobbley
TitleFIRE INSPECTOR
Phone #794-9483
Permit NumberDescriptionReceivedRequestedCompletedAM/PMDisposition 
BLD09-01210 FIRE-Final Inspection8/19/20098/19/20098/19/2009 4:38:17 PMPFAIL
Provide approved single action hardware on the three relocated doors.
FIR09-00291 INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in8/19/20098/19/20098/19/2009 4:09:44 PMPPASS
The bakery area sprinkler piping can be covered. I noted and discussed with todd overspaced and painted upright sprinkler heads at the new room just to the west of the bakery.
FIR09-00317 INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in8/19/20098/19/20098/19/2009 4:07:51 PMPFAIL
Todays inspection was a rough-to-cover inspection for system 2 (attic). After arriving at the project I found that the latest city approved plans were not on site for the inspection. Instead of leaving I stayed at the fitters request to inspect the dry pendant spacing below the ceilings. Half of the the classrooms were locked. The classrooms that were open had missing pendant heads and the plastic shipping clips had not been removed from many of the pendants. So I stopped with the below ceiling inspecion. At this time plans arrived and I started the attic inspection. As with the previous inspection upright coverage is missing at overbuild areas, heads are spaced too far off of smoke curtains and shear walls, heads are spaced too close together. Also the hangers do not meet the minimum distance from the bottom of the structural members as required for branchlines and mains per NFPA 13 chapter 9. Also per chapter 9 the minimum member size to hang 4" piping is 4 x 3. 2 x4 are being used. I also noted that the sprinkler piping does not match the plans near the riser.
FIR09-00449 INSP-Supply line flush8/18/20098/19/20098/19/2009 1:53:11 PMPPASS
The underground supply piping can be covered. Final approval of the PIV location will need to be approved by mark sentenno since it is less than 40' from the building and is not located as shown on the plans. Also the two 45 degree fittings shown on the city approved plans did not need to be installed and the underground was installed straight into the building. Also the "deadman" fittings could not be inspected since several yards of concrete have already been poured over them. None of the interior penatration of the underground supply has been inspected.
FIR09-00451 INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in8/18/20098/19/20098/19/2009 12:49:32 PMAPART
See the city approved plans for locations where the sprinkler piping can be covered.
BLD09-01287 FIRE-Final Inspection8/18/20098/19/20098/19/2009 9:34:48 AMAPASS
Life safety passed.