Information based on query as of Wednesday, July 17, 2024.
Permit Information
Permit NumberBLD00-00659
StatusExpired
Name STOCK COMPONENTS TRUSS PLANT
Site Address 3210 E AMITY RD
Project Name 
Customer Number 
ePlanReviewNo
Description
(NEW TENANT - STOCK COMPONENTS TRUSS PLANT) Based on code analysis of building and plans prepared there from, by Cole | Associates Architects, to remove a 50' x 80' metal storage building and a 11' x 118' storage building as indicated on plans, to create a 60 foot clearance all around the manufacturing building. This is done because the storage buildings are not sprinkled and the major building is and tenant does not want to sprinkler out buildings or create fire walls. The 60 feet is also proposed for use to allow unlimited area of the major sprinkled building as a "F-1" / "B" / & "S-2" occupancies. Other work to include removal of door to provide proper floor area at stairs; demolition of an existing stairway & door with frame / sheetrock infill; handrails, guardrails, door hardware, landings, exit signs & illumination; accessibility & usability upgrades per plan. VERIFY - this building is fully sprinkled for allowable area increase. All per approved plans, notes & attachments. CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY REQUIRED FOR NEW TENANT. BUILDING ORIGINALLY CONSTRUCTED IN ADA COUNTY. PC#00-186/drs
Contact Information
See Activities list for contact information
Color Key
Current location of plans being reviewed:  
Show Inspection Activities Only
DescriptionReceivedRequestedCompletedAM/PMDispositionAssigned To 
Case Summary (BLD)  9/16/2006  
BLD-Aging Inspection6/6/20056/6/20056/8/2005 PASS
DetailsJim Storey
expired
DOC - Permit Expired6/8/20056/8/20056/8/2005PPASS
DetailsJim Storey
BLD-Aging Inspection3/29/20053/29/20054/4/2005 PASS
DetailsJim Storey
EXPIRED NO ACTIONS.
DOC - Permit Expired4/4/20054/4/20054/4/2005PPASS
DetailsJim Storey
NO ACTIONS TIME EXPIRED.
BLD-Aging Inspection10/5/200410/5/200410/5/2004 FAIL
DetailsJim Storey
no action pending. 10/5/2004 8:31:12 AM
BLD-Aging Inspection8/3/20048/3/20048/3/2004 FAIL
DetailsJim Storey
pending action same isue. 8/3/2004 7:49:20 AM
BLD-Aging Inspection6/3/20046/3/20046/3/2004 FAIL
DetailsJim Storey
no action same isue. 6/4/2004 4:39:33 PM
BLD-Aging Inspection3/22/20043/22/20043/22/2004 FAIL
DetailsJim Storey
no action same isue. 3/22/2004 4:49:50 PM
BLD-Aging Inspection1/20/20041/20/20041/20/2004 FAIL
DetailsJim Storey
no action same isue. 1/20/2004 8:24:09 AM
BLD-Aging Inspection11/17/200311/17/200311/17/2003 FAIL
DetailsJim Storey
same responce as previously. 11/17/2003 8:45:42 AM
BLD-Aging Inspection9/15/20039/15/20039/15/2003 FAIL
DetailsJim Storey
pending action from j.g. 9/15/2003 7:28:30 AM
BLD-Aging Inspection7/14/20037/14/20037/14/2003 FAIL
DetailsJim Storey
no action from tenet or boise city deptment heads. 7/14/2003 7:55:23 AM
BLD-Aging Inspection5/12/20035/12/20035/12/2003 FAIL
DetailsJim Storey
no insp. need fire to proceed 25 day notice expired whith notice to j.gililand and t sabacka at that time. left word to please call for fire insp. 5/14/2003 11:11:01 AM
BLD-Conference3/7/20033/10/20033/10/2003APASS
DetailsJim Storey
phone call to inform permitee as to what insp. needed. 3/10/2003 9:08:26 AM
BLD-Final3/6/20033/7/20033/7/2003PCANC
DetailsJim Storey
Scheduled by a contractor via Hello! on 3/6/2003 at 11:10:55 AM. Contact: ###-####. rolled over to monday no one on site to cover insp. scope and proceegers with. 3/7/2003 4:39:28 PM
Inspection Record Card- Bld  2/27/2003 DONE
Print Occupancy Form  2/27/2003 DONE
Telephone call  2/20/2003 DONE
Telcon with fire alarm contractor - see detailed telcon notes under FIR01-00406.
BLD-Conference2/12/20032/19/20032/19/2003ADONE
DetailsJim Storey
need to isue 25 day notice and order.isued on file with planreview. 2/19/2003 2:57:46 PM
BLD-Aging Inspection2/10/20032/10/20032/10/2003 FAIL
DetailsJim Storey
isued 5 day notice and order. 2/12/2003 8:30:56 AM
BLD-Aging Inspection12/9/200212/9/200212/9/2002 FAIL
DetailsJim Storey
ubc 106.4.4 contact plan review for new permit/ 104.2.5 occ. w/o insp. or approval contact planreview. 12/9/2002 11:41:41 AM
Telephone call  2/19/2002 DONE
talked to rick to verify plans are ready
Issue PAID IN FULL permit  2/19/2002 DONE
CHANGE ISSUED DATE  2/19/2002 DONE
Inspection Record Card- Bld  12/31/2001 DONE
Telephone call  12/31/2001 DONE
rick ###-####
Routing - PLAN CHECK12/24/2001 12/28/2001 PASS
Plans approved with conditions by Fire Code analyst. Plans approved for permit issuance based on attached plan review comments & conditions. Routing to permit desk.
PLANS/APPL TAKEN TO FRONT DESK  12/28/2001 PASS
To permit desk for issue.
Plan assigned to (DRS)3/17/2000 12/28/2001 PASS
DetailsDan Stuart
12/28/2001 07:08:51 DRS - activity updated through activity BLDA022 from case BLD00-00659.
Routing - FIRE12/20/200112/20/200112/24/2001 PASS
DetailsBill Alexander
CHANGE STATUS TO (PND)  7/17/2001 PEND
Additional plans submitted  5/30/2001  
Received copy of report by Lance N. Long, General Counsel, Anderson Components, concerning use of a conveyor system used to collect sawdust created by use of the two saws that cut the truss components (webs, top & bottom chords). A copy of a report from a mechanical engineer, Adolfo Costello, MiTek Industries, Inc., calculating the amount of sawdust created by the cutting of truss components. A sample of the "Wood Dust Cleaning Procedures for the Anderson Components Idaho Falls Saw Shop was also submitted for evaluation. Additional clarification is needed and I will request this information from Lance N. Long.
Plan resubmittals requested  5/30/2001  
Additional clarification requested concerning the conveyor system components, how it is attached to the saws and if it is interconnected to the saw operation switch; whre does the conveyor system collect the sawdust (in open bin or closed, inside or outside the building); is the conveyor system sized per the saw manufacture's design requirements and design specs if available (cfm capability of the conveyance system); clarification on the interconnection of the saw cutting operation and the large overhead doors that are kept open at all times when the saws are in operation as noted in third paragraph, reason two. Are the doors, saws and conveyor system connected by electronic components that will not allow the operation of the saws if the other doors are not open and the conveyor system not on? Please present a similar "Cleaning Procedure" proposal specifically for the "Anderson Components Boise Saw Shop" for consideration by the Fire Department. This above clarification & information, when received, will be forwarded to the fire department for their review and comments upon it's receipt.
Plan resubmittals received  5/29/2001  
Plan resubmittals received  5/29/2001  
Architect submitted two new copies of sheet A2.0 for Anderson Components. Submittals of 5/29/01 removed the restrooms located in the manufacturing area from being upgraded to full accessiblity compliance from the plans previously submited on 9/7/00. 20% of the permit cost ($4,361.00 x .20 = $872.20) will be used to upgrade accessiblitity by providing an accessible parking space; providing a ramp / landing system to the main office entry; and installing accessible lever hardware.
Fee Review-notes3/15/20003/15/20004/25/2001 DONE
Plan Reviewer's activity  4/20/2001  
e-mail to George Slane & Bob Archibald concerning tenant move in & work done with out permits, approved plans or certificate of occupancy. Follow up to Sept. 2000 notice of violation. No comments previously received.
Temporary occupancy  4/20/2001 FAIL
DetailsSteven Webb
received note from dstuart that work is being done and building occupied without permit or inspection. Routed to bob archibald for action by inspector.(steve webb)
Plan resubmittals requested  9/25/2000  
Provided written comments to Stan Cole & Ward Schwider, Cole | Associate's Architects, notifying them of specific items note complied with in the previous three submittals and that the structural division was being requested to serve the new tenant notice that he was illeagaly occupying the facility and that work has been done withourt approved plans, permits or ispections. A new Certificate of Value is also required as previously requested showing the breakdown of the separate costs for plumbing, mechanical, electrical, and fire sprinkler addition / modification / upgrade required to brinf facility into compliance.
Routing - FIRE9/18/20009/21/20009/22/2000 FAIL
DetailsBill Alexander
Still lack fire sprinkler design information to verify occupancy use protection. Lack current inspection and use obsolete format (not meet NFPA 25 and not accepted by the fire department).
Routing - PLAN CHECK4/20/2000 9/18/2000 PEND
Resubmittal of Sheet A2.0 & cover letter response from Ward Schwider, reviewed and inserted into original plans to replace previous A2.0 sheets. Re-submittal in response to April 17, 2000, second plan review. New Certificate of Value provided but does not have the separate values broken out that make up the total for electrical, plumbing & sprinkler system. Per the submittal from architect, many of the items have been completed withi out approved plans, inspections & approvals. Inspectors will need to verify compliance to their satisfaction to allow issuance of a certificate of occupancy for this new tenant. Routing to Fire Code analyst for review per their previous "failed" plan review.
Plan resubmittals received  9/7/2000 DONE
RECEIVED TWO COPIES OF REVISED SHEETS A2.0. ROUTED TO DAN S KMM
Routing - FIRE4/18/20004/20/20004/20/2000 FAIL
DetailsBill Alexander
UFC issues to address.
Plan Review Completed(1st rev)  4/20/2000 FAIL
DetailsBill Alexander
Routing - PLAN CHECK4/14/20004/14/20004/17/2000 PEND
INSERTED NEW RE-SUBMITTALS INTO ORIGINAL PLAN SUBMITTALS. CHANGES TO OCCUPANCY USE DECLARATION CHANGES IN RESPONSE TO REQUIREMENT FOR DECLARING ROOM AND AREA USES HAS CAUSED ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS IN WHAT IS NOW AND ACCESSORY "A-3" BREAKROOM. OTHER CLARIFICATION COMMENTS AND CODE SECTIONS NOTED ON PLANS FOR CONTRACTOR AND INSPECTOR VERIFICATION. ROUTING PLANS TO FIRE CODE ANALYST FOR REVIEW WHILE WAITING FOR CERTIFICATE OF VALUE UPGRADE.
Waiting for Cert. of Value  4/17/2000  
NEW VALUE OF $4,361.00 DECLARED ON COVER SHEET ACCOMPANYING RE-SUBMITTALS, BUT NO NEW CERTIFICATE OF VALUE FOR TOTAL COSTS AND EACH SEPARATE CATAGORY OF APPLICABLE ELECTRICAL, MECHANICAL, PLUMBING & FIRE SPRINKLER IMPROVMENT COSTS.
Plan resubmittals requested  4/17/2000 FAIL
RE-SUBMITTALS INCOMPLETE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CLARIFY THE CHANGES SUBMITTED BUT NOT ADDRESSED PER CODE ON THE PLANS & CERT. OF VALUE NOT SUBMITTED. LIST OF ITEMS STILL IN QUESTION LIST FAXED AND MAILED TO ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW. ROUTING TO FIRE DEPT. FOR REVIEW.
Plan resubmittals received  4/14/2000 DONE
RECEIVED PLAN CHECK RESUBMITTALS FROM COLE AND ASSOCIATES. FORWARDED SAME TO DANNY STUART. 4/14/00 DAR
Plan resubmittals requested  4/3/2000  
Copy of plan review comments FAXED & MAILED to Ward Schwinder.
Routing - PLAN CHECK3/17/2000 4/3/2000 FAIL
Plans are incomplete as to dimensioning and occupancy use of each area; details of changes made as a result of the code analysis but with out approved plans or permits or inspections. Ward had discussed this with me on two sepaerate occations, 4/14/99 & 4/29/00 as to what steps would be required for a new tenant to occupy this building site. We went through the things he would need to address in the code analysis and in the way of plans as this facility was constructed in Ada County prior to plan review process and there are no plans availble for reference or review. One of the methods for working with the tenant to obtain an occupancy was to use Resolution 13534, adopted specifically created for buildings annexed into the city and not in compliance with building standards. As Ward Schwinder did not contact me back after the preliminaries, the project was set aside and basically cancelled, gathering that the proposed tenant had not desired to pusue the matter since an existing building would need to be sprinkled or demolished.
On 3/13/00, Ward Schwinder called, at which time he said the work was completed and he had reviewed the work and they were ready for a certificate of occupancy. Ward was told he had never presented the plans required or the application for said proposed project and the work or occupancy should not have taken place until such time as approved.
Plans are to be prepared and presented for review and a permit for the proposed occupancy use with code compliance changes shown on plans and methods of correction.
Pending Assignment by MYS3/15/2000 3/17/2000 DONE
DetailsMarlene Southard
Plan routing begun/TENANTS  3/17/2000 DONE
Route to PLAN CHECK and FIRE.
Plans ACCEPTED BY PLAN TECH  3/16/2000 DONE
Routing - PLAN CHECK9/22/2000   FAIL
9/22/00 - Fire code analysts failed resubmittals as incomplete. This is the second fail. Plans on hold behind my desk.