Fee Review-notes | 5/30/2000 | 5/30/2000 | 6/27/2001 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Letter of compliance | | | 6/26/2001 | | DONE |
|
|
|
Letter of Complliance #21548 issued 6-26-01.
|
BLD-Final | 6/22/2001 | 6/25/2001 | 6/25/2001 | A | PASS |
Tom Arcoraci
|
|
|
Scheduled by a contractor via Hello! on 06/22/2001 at 09:35:59. Contact: ###-####.ok for perm occ 6/24/2001 9:32:45 PM
|
BLD-Final | 6/21/2001 | 6/21/2001 | 6/21/2001 | A | PASS |
Joe Tawney
|
|
|
Added by Inspector: 406 On 6/21/2001 11:25:44 AM Final OK for certificate of completion
|
CHANGE STATUS TO (ISS) | | | 6/21/2001 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Issue PAID IN FULL permit | | | 10/19/2000 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Routing - FIRE | 10/6/2000 | 10/11/2000 | 10/12/2000 | | PASS |
|
|
|
Also created an FIR for the alarm modifications required (FIR00-00583)
|
Plan assigned to (DRS) | 5/31/2000 | 5/31/2000 | 10/12/2000 | | PASS |
Dan Stuart
|
|
|
10/12/2000 10:00:08 DRS - activity updated through activity BLDA022 from case BLD00-01528.
|
Routing - PLAN CHECK | 10/12/2000 | | 10/12/2000 | | PASS |
|
|
|
Approved as noted & attached.
|
PLANS/APPL TAKEN TO FRONT DESK | | | 10/12/2000 | | PASS |
|
|
|
Routing to permit desk for issuance.
|
Print Occupancy Form | | | 10/12/2000 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Inspection Record Card- Bld | | | 10/12/2000 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Telephone call | | | 10/12/2000 | | DONE |
|
|
|
called permit ready
|
Routing - PLAN CHECK | 7/3/2000 | | 10/6/2000 | | FAIL |
|
|
|
(WITH FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL - THE PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED) RESPONSE SUBMITTALS RECEIVED 9/28/00 HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED INTO PLAN SETS. REVIEWING ORIGINAL FILES ON HP#6 PROJECT TO FIND VERIFICATION OF FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCEPTANCE OF THE CHEMICAL ANALYSIS DONE BY McRae Willmert, TESTING CHEMICAL DILUTIONS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE MATERIALS TAKEN FROM THE SITE TO PROVIDE EVIDENCE TO THE FIRE CODE ANALYST, FLOYD VARLEY, THAT THE MATERIALS AS CONTAINED ARE BELOW LIMITS ESTABLISHED BY FIRE CODE TO ALLOW CLASSIFYING AS NON-HPM (CLASSIFIED < 3 HEALTH OR FIRE). dATA WAS SUBMITTED TO FLOYD AND ACCEPTED ON 11/6/97. REMAINING ITEM TO BE ANSWERED BY HP WAS AN ACCEPTABLE PROCEDURE TO MONITOR THE CHEMICAL WASTES TO PROVIDE REASONABLE ASSURANCE THAT THE CONCENTRATIONS OF CHEMICALS IN WASTE PRODUCTS DO NOT EXCEED THE HPM CLASSIFICATION LIMITS BASED ON THEIR PROCEDURRE'S OF CHEMICAL USE AT UPPER LEVEL TOOL'S THAT USE THE CHEMICALS AND ALSO TO DESCRIBE THE PROCEDURE TO FOLLOW IF A LARGER THAN NORMAL CHEMICAL RELEASE IS DONE THAT WOULD EFFECT THE APPROVED CONCENTRATION LIMITS. THIS LETTER WAS PROVIDED TO FLOYD ON 5/19/98 AND APPROVED. BASED ON THIS DATA THE HPM CORRIDOR IN THE BASEMENT IS NOT REQUIRED AND ALL PREVIOUS CODE ITEMS GOVERNED BY THE HPM CORRIDOR CLASSIFICATION ARE REMOVED.
|
Plan Reviewer's activity | | | 10/5/2000 | | |
|
|
|
Information submitted from Steve Simmons, architect for proposed project, included a copy of a response to the fire deparment code review analysis on April 24, 1997 in which the following statement was made: "PER OUR MEETING ON MONDAY, APRIL 21,1997, HEWLETT PACKARD HAS STATED THAT NO HAZARDOUS PRODUCTION MATERIALS WILL BE TRANSFERRED THROUGH THE EXISTING BASEMENT EXIT CORRIDOR." The remaining concern at the time of this response was in reference to the declared chemicals that would be used on the upper level at the special tools and the waste product contained as part of the hazardous materials in 55 gallon drums in the basement PH-ADJUST Room. Four of the declared chemicals as listed would be classified as Hazardous Production Materials and would need to be removed from the basement area, when barrels are full, in an HPM Service Corridor. Fire plan review required that sufficient evidence be provided to show that the products as store / collected in the PH-Adjust room would not be classified as HPM Materials (classification as <3 for Health & Fire) and the procedure to be used by HP Staff to maintain the diluted concentrations to maintain them as non-HPM materials and what was to be done if the concentrations did become > 2 classification, before any product waste is transported from the PH-ADJUST room to the exterior. There were several proposals made but non satisfactory until an actual chemical analysis by an approved special consultant chemical engineer, McRae B. Willmert, provide an actual chemical analysis of the waste products as collected at the site with the Inkjet Cartridge Production facility under full production, per TCO approved by Tim Hogland, Building Official, August 8, 1997. The analysis and method of conversion to approriate form to show the products based on percentage of concentration would qualify as non-HPM materials was submitted to Floyd Varley and accepted by him on 11/6/97.
The procedure for monitoring the concentration levels and procedure of what to do in the event of increased release event of HPM chemicals from Tool Area that may cause the waste dilutions to become > 2 classification for Health or Fire and how to bring back to acceptable dilution levels before any product is transferred from the PH-ADJUST room by way of existing exit corridors to the exterior for removal / treatment. This procedure letter was received from Linda Bowen, HP Environmental Consultant, and approved on May 19, 1998. Based on this data and fire code analyst review and approval, the HPM Corridor in the basement IS NOT required.
|
Plan resubmittals received | | | 9/28/2000 | | DONE |
|
|
|
RECEIVED THREE COPIES OF REVISED SHEETS UPGRADE FIRE / SMOKE DAMPERS BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN, BLDG.#6 LOWER HVAC FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT FIRE DAMPER UPGRADE / DETAILS AND SCHEMATICS. TWO COPIES OF REVISED SHEET A2.0. ONE COPY OF LETTER FROM STEVEN M. SIMMONS. ROUTED TO DAN S. KMM
|
Meeting | | | 8/18/2000 | | |
|
|
|
Met with Steve Simmons, Lombard-Conrad Arch.; Tim Bashford, HP Project Manager; Steve Christiansen & Jared Miller, Elkhorn Mechanical Engineering, to review the plan review comments / concerns about this project. The answers presented appeared to be satisfactory but I ask them to provide an analysis from the appropriate engineers for reasons to eliminate smoke/dampers per section 713.10 and documentation showing evidence of NON-HPM products being stored and or transported within the basement area (from PH-Adjust Room - chemical wastes are store in diluted form until collection drums need emptied) with acceptance by the fire code analyst plan reviewer - Floyd Varley. The meeting adjourned with the above information to be submitted ASAP so the permit can be processed for issuance.
|
Routing - FIRE | 6/27/2000 | | 6/30/2000 | | FAIL |
|
|
|
Inadeq. info. Awaiting add'l info requested by Dan Stuart
|
Plan Review Completed(1st rev) | | | 6/30/2000 | | FAIL |
|
|
|
failed bldg and fire review
|
Routing - PLAN CHECK | 6/26/2000 | 6/26/2000 | 6/27/2000 | | FAIL |
|
|
|
CLARIFICATIONS / CORRECTIONS TO PLANS REQUIRED. ROUTED TO FIRE CODE ANALYSTS FOR REVIEW.
|
Plan resubmittals requested | | | 6/27/2000 | | |
|
|
|
Faxed and mailed copy of plan review comments to Steve Simmons, Lombard-Conrad for his response.
|
Telephone call | | | 6/27/2000 | | DONE |
|
|
|
Call to Steve Simmons, architect, to discuss plans submitted and if "as-built" at site. Steve was out of office until Thursday P.M. Left phone mail message for him to call.
|
Pending Assignment by MYS | 5/30/2000 | | 5/31/2000 | | |
Marlene Southard
|
|
|
|
Plans ACCEPTED BY PLAN TECH | | | 5/31/2000 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Application received | | | 5/30/2000 | | |
|
|
|
|
Recd Pcfee & Taken To Pln CK | | | | | |
|
|
|
|