Case Summary (BLD) | | | 9/7/2016 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Fee Review-notes | 3/12/2001 | 3/12/2001 | 5/25/2001 | | DONE |
|
|
|
value is really low
|
Permanent Occupancy | | 4/18/2001 | 4/18/2001 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Permanent occupancy | | | 4/18/2001 | | DONE |
|
|
|
Perm. Occ. Cert. #8637 issued 4-18-01 to Door Supply, Inc.
|
FIRE-Final Inspection | 4/10/2001 | 4/11/2001 | 4/11/2001 | P | PASS |
Rick Jackson
|
|
|
Scheduled by a contractor via Hello! on 04/10/2001 at 12:18:01. Contact: ###-####.
|
BLD-Final | 4/10/2001 | 4/11/2001 | 4/11/2001 | P | PASS |
Jim Storey
|
|
|
Scheduled by a contractor via Hello! on 04/10/2001 at 12:18:46. Contact: ###-####. c/o ok 4/12/2001 8:56:26 AM
|
BLD-Final | 4/6/2001 | 4/10/2001 | 4/10/2001 | A | NR |
Jim Storey
|
|
|
Scheduled by a contractor via Hello! on 04/06/2001 at 11:46:08. Contact: ###-####.
|
Print Occupancy Form | | | 4/6/2001 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Issue PAID IN FULL permit | | | 3/14/2001 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Print Occupancy Form | | | 3/13/2001 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Inspection Record Card- Bld | | | 3/13/2001 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Telephone call | | | 3/13/2001 | | DONE |
|
|
|
called permit ready
|
Routing - PLAN CHECK | 3/8/2001 | 3/8/2001 | 3/12/2001 | | PEND |
|
|
|
3/8/01 - Called Matt Rhees, Cole | Associates to provide an application and certificate of value for the new tenant improvment.
3/12/01 - Called and left message for Mike Eisenbeiss, Thornton Oliver Keller to request his assistance in obtaining an application and certificate of value for Door Supply project.
3/12/01 - Call from Matt Rhees to refresh the information requested of him on 3/8/01. Said he would fax over application and certificate of value.
3/13/01 - Application & C.V received.
|
Plan assigned to (DRS) | 12/19/2000 | 12/19/2000 | 3/12/2001 | | PASS |
Dan Stuart
|
|
|
3/12/2001 16:09:53 DRS - activity updated through activity BLDA022 from case BLD00-03730.
|
Application received | | | 3/12/2001 | | PASS |
|
|
|
Correct tenant improvment application provided.
|
Received Certificate of Value | | | 3/12/2001 | | |
|
|
|
Received C.V with low value. Called owner of Door Supply - $1,000.00 of electrical done for equipment. Still need roof top vents> Architects data incomplete. Call to Moke Eisenbeiss to get data clear.
|
Routing - PLAN CHECK | 3/8/2001 | 3/8/2001 | 3/8/2001 | | PASS |
|
|
|
Plans re-routed to Richard Daley, Fire Code Analyst. Approved plans for issue. Approved per notes and attachments. Routing to permit desk.
|
Routing - FIRE | 3/5/2001 | 3/7/2001 | 3/7/2001 | | PASS |
|
|
|
3/5/01 - took to richard per his request. pe
3/7/01 - Conditions: confirm storage height
|
Routing - PLAN CHECK | 2/27/2001 | 2/27/2001 | 2/27/2001 | | FAIL |
|
|
|
Plans returned from fire code analyst unapproved. Note by reviewer of contacting architect for information required. Plans are behind my desk waiting for re-submittals for fire code plan reviewer.
|
Routing - FIRE | 2/23/2001 | 2/23/2001 | 2/27/2001 | | PEND |
|
|
|
CONTACTED ARCHITECT FOR INFO ON SMOKE VENTING
|
Routing - PLAN CHECK | 2/23/2001 | 2/23/2001 | 2/23/2001 | | PEND |
|
|
|
New plans & review comments routed to fire code analyst for review. Resubmittals not required at this time - may change after fire code analysis of architects response. Routing to fire dept.
|
Plan resubmittals received | | | 2/13/2001 | | DONE |
|
|
|
Received three copies of revised sheet A1.1 and one copy of plan review response letter. Routed to Dan S. KMM
|
Meeting | | | 1/10/2001 | | |
|
|
|
Meeting requested by Stan Cole, Cole | Associate Architects through Marlene Southard, Plan Review Div. Mngr. Those in attendance were Stan Cole & Matt Rhees of Cole | Associates; Peter Oliver of Thornton - Oliver - Keller; Sam Rogers & Bill Alexander, Fire Code Analysts and Marlene Southard / Dan Stuart of Plan Review Div.
Matt Rhees had concerns about information required and discussion of 12/19/00 when Matt had left the plans for several tenant spaces using the Occupancy Approval Review Application form. The plans had been presented without any dimensions; without any description of the storage heights or layout of the storage areas for use in determining applicability & requirements of Article 81 & NFPA #13. Plans did not reflect accessibility upgrades or any existing accessibility means. Elevations or sections not included for reference of existing conditions& three of the doors shown on the plans do not indicate landings, stairs, etc. while those doors with landing & stairs shown would indicate approximately 48" above grade.
Sam & Bill discussed the limits of the sprinkler system based on storage height, commodity and available water at the site as used for sprinkler system design and that information provided on the plans for review is required to clearly reflect and show what is proposed and that the installation is compatible with adopted codes.
Another discussion involved the new tenants that had occupied spaces since the issuance of violation notice to original tenant requiring they obtain a certificate of occupancy. Even though the same type of occupancy use group, warehouse - "S-1" has replaced the last tenant, plans need to clearly reflect the conditions required for the new tenant in relation to storage commodity and heights; if there will be or are rack storage; aisle widths; egress access; clear concise declaration of commodities; that no hazardous materials are being stored that are not properly protected and withion allowable limits per table 3-D & 3-E UBC. Plans need to indicate differences between plans on file & existing as-built for work done without permits.
The architect is required to provide clear explanations & details to show compliance with adopted codes. As the architect of record the architect also verifies all submittals from other design sources as being compatible with his original submittals for code compliance.
Stan Cole said he understood what was required and Peter Oliver told Matt that the plans would have to be prepared to reflect the existing and required conditions.
|
Routing - PLAN CHECK | 12/19/2000 | 12/19/2000 | 12/29/2000 | | FAIL |
|
|
|
Plans submitted under wrong application and without sufficient information concerning dimensions; layout of storage materials in warehouse; height of storage; evaluation of commodities and existing sprinkler system for the products / commodities store; no declaration that the materials are store only - that there is no fabrication to blank door slabs (mortise & hinge, hole sawing for latch/lock hardware, door cut-off / plane to fit or cut out for installation of window units); and the accessible route to the tenant space is not indicate and details of construction not provided.
|
Plan resubmittals requested | | | 12/29/2000 | | FAIL |
|
|
|
Sent FAX to Stan Cole concerning the plans submitted: need him to reference to the fire code analyst's review provide under the Vanilla Finish permit that are needed by the fire code analysts before a permit can be issued; dimensioned plans & layout for use of the storage areas to indicate aisles; accessiblity upgrades per code. This is part of what propmpted the meeting of 1/10/01.
|
Application received | | | 12/19/2000 | | |
Dan Stuart
|
|
|
Incorrect application provided. Sent MIS application with plans. This plan will require routing to fire department and the installation of the mechanical dust collection system is an addition to the tenant space. The verification of the layout and required collection installation and approval by the fire, mechanical & structural inspectors is required. This is a regular tenant application permit and requires a certificate of value. Matt Rhees to provide.
|
Waiting for Cert. of Value | | | 12/19/2000 | | |
|
|
|
Need C.V. before permit can be issued
|
Plan resubmittals requested | | | 1/17/2000 | | |
|
|
|
Additional information to be provided based on our meeting of 1/10/01 with Cole Assoc, (Stan & Matt); Thornton Oliver Keller (Peter Oliver); Fire Dept. Plan Review ( Sam & Bill); and plan check div. ( Marlene & Dan). Faxed & Mailed plan check report to Matt & Micahel Eisenbeiss.
|