as soon as possible // Larry Phone #: ###-####
Need ACHD, Zoning, Public Works, Fire Alarm, Fire Sprinkler, ...... finals prior to Structural Final. - ok for temp

Rescheduled for tomorrow morning per Larry Phone #: ###-####

larry Phone #: ###-####

Larry-please call 30 minutes prior Phone #: ###-####. Needs fire/life/safety and fire alarm and fire sprinkler finals.

Jeff Phone #: ###-####

Jeff Phone #: ###-#### roof ok

request 11am, wants to pour at 11:30 // Jeff Phone #: ###-#### pending spec insp by strata

recieved email from Lance Warnick that he submitted civil revisions on 2/18/14

From: Lance Warnick [mailto:lance@AspenEngineers.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 4:36 PM
To: 'Jim Wyllie'
Cc: 'Brian Murphy'; Rick Bugatsch (rbugatsch@hbarchitecture.com)
Subject: RE: Gillingham # 2 Building - Revised Civil Plans and Reports

Jim,

As I described in my voicemail message, it is my understanding that Larry’s attorney is working to get the reservation for the future easement ready to address stormwater runoff from the east side of the driveway.

I am not sure when you will let us submit the plans, but I wanted to get these in your hands while waiting for the attorney. I can bring you hard copies whenever you are ready, but in the meantime, I posted PDF copies of the civil plans, drainage report and geotechnical report in my Dropbox at the following location:

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/koxp2flohrs5a5h/x6sLq4DDmv

As shown in the attached documents your comments were modified as described below:

1. The Geotechnical Investigation is outdated. Submit a new geotechnical investigation or have the geotechnical engineer approve the use of the document for your project.
An updated geotech report dated January 10, 2014 is provided that reiterates the project requirements.

2. The drainage swale is located too close to the lot line. The CC & R’s for the subdivision require that the swale be located 25 feet from interior lot lines. Please submit a copy of the recorded CC& R’s to document the setback requirement.
As shown on Sheets C3.1 and C4.2, the swale was moved to be a minimum of 25’ from the property line as requested.

3. The drainage plans (sheets C-4.1 and C-4.2) show drainage across the lot line adjacent to the driveway. This is not permitted.
As we discussed, it is my understanding that Larry’s attorney is working to get the reservation for the future easement ready to address stormwater runoff from the east side of the driveway.

4. Finish contours for sheets C-3.1, C-4.1 and C-4.2 are not labeled.
As shown on Sheets C3.1, C4.1 and C4.2, the finished 1’ contour lines are labeled as requested.

5. The Stormwater Management Calculations report does not list a percolation rate for the drainage swale or the time it takes for the swale to drain after a fifty year storm event. Please provide this information.
As shown in Section 5I on Page 7 of the revised Storm Calculations, the swale is expected to drain within 12 hours using the 1.5 in/hr infiltration rate reported on Page 14 of the geotechnical report. If only ½ of the swale surface drains, then the swale would drain in 1 day. If percolation was limited to only ¼ of the swale surface, then the swale would still drain in 2 days.

Please let me know what else you need and when I can get you hard copies of the plans and drainage report / storm calcs.

Thanks,

Lance Warnick, P.E.
Principal Engineer

Aspen Engineers
485 W. Main St, Suite B ? PO Box 205 ? Kuna, Idaho 83634
Phone ###-#### ? Cell ###-#### ? lance@AspenEngineers.com

From: Jim Wyllie [mailto:JWYLLIE@cityofboise.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2013 8:19 AM
To: Warnick, Lance
Cc: Brian Murphy
Subject: Gillingham # 2 Building

Lance,

Review comments for the Gillingham #2 Building Grading and Drainage Plans are listed as follows:

1. The Geotechnical Investigation is outdated. Submit a new geotechnical investigation or have the geotechnical engineer approve the use of the document for your project.
2. The drainage swale is located too close to the lot line. The CC & R’s for the subdivision require that the swale be located 25 feet from interior lot lines. Please submit a copy of the recorded CC& R’s to document the setback requirement.
3. The drainage plans (sheets C-4.1 and C-4.2) show drainage across the lot line adjacent to the driveway. This is not permitted.
4. Finish contours for sheets C-3.1, C-4.1 and C-4.2 are not labeled

Fire Plan Report attached

received four sets of revised plan sheets marked P1.0 as well as one response letter; Taken to Adele for further review

1. Show shop drainage connection to sewer on civil plans.
2. 3 inch vent for flammable interceptor required to be vented seperately from sanitary vents.

recieved letter of approval

gave revised report to Tisha to route- 1/16/14 send ammended geotech report

Requested drainage revisions (email 11-27-13) not addressed. Jim Wyllie (###-####)

called Action Couriers for pick up of resubs

Failed, Fire, Plan Check, Plumbing, PW

spoke with Rick, the geo tech report when ammended to corrected the expired date also needs to be ammended to reflect the scope of the submitted project as it is different than the scoping specified and limited to in the report. Rick said he will speak with the owner about getting the ammended report 12/11/13 ajs

The applicant has not provided a recorded cross access agreement from the neighborhing property and has not paved all of the vehicular manuevering areas. To mee the requirement of DRH13-00109, the applicant hsould provide a recorded corss access agreement and pave the drive aisles located on the north and east sides of the building. Andrea

called Action Couriers for pick up

Gave sheet A1, A2, A3 to Tisha to route to off site structural

Received one response letter and three sets of revised plan sheets marked A1, A2 & A3;Taken to Adele for further review

Plans indicated 1500 oil/water separator in service bay.

Emailed comments to Rick, architect 11/29/13

Parcel A of Record of Survey 9558.

Emailed Engineer list of corrections required.