Boise PDS Online - BLD97-02131

Information based on query as of Sunday, July 7, 2024.

Permit Information

Permit Number	BLD97-02131
Status	Expired
Name	THORNTON SCOTT J & DENICE B
Site Address	2919 W CANAL ST
Project Name	THORNTON APARTMENTS
Customer Number
ePlanReview	No
Description	To construct a new 4379sf two story 4plex apartment building on property per approved plans and attachments. (First Floor=2097)(Second Floor=2282). CU-4-97. PLAN CHECK #474-97. ACHD#98-0073. PRP

Contact Information

See Activities list for contact information

Permit Details Project Related Cases Activities Conditions Parcel Fees Valuation Documents Permit Summary Report

Show Inspection Activities Only

Description

Received

Requested

Completed

AM/PM

Disposition

Assigned To

Code Occupancy Approval

6/9/1999

PASS

Name:
Title:
Phone:

PARKING LOT AND DUMPSTER SCREENING HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH, BOND RELEASED AND FINAL OCCUPANCY SIGNED OFF.

INSP-Final Inspection

6/25/1998

PART

Name:	Rick Jackson
Title:	FIRE INSPECTOR
Phone:	794-1981

Rick Jackson

fire lanes needed - temp c/o approved

INSP - Final

6/24/1998

6/25/1998

PART

Name:	Jim Storey
Title:	BLD-COM/RES INSPECTOR
Phone:	794-9490

Jim Storey

06/24/98 301 - temp w/c/n

Temporary occupancy

6/25/1998

PASS

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Temp. Occ. Cert. #3643 issued 6-25-98 to the Thornton Apts.

INSP - Final

6/17/1998

6/18/1998

6/19/1998

PART

Name:	Russ Owen
Title:	BLD-COM/RES INSPECTOR
Phone:	794-9473

Russ Owen

06/18/98 407 - Final - courtesy inspection - Denice - call 1st ###-####

INSP-Final Inspection

6/17/1998

6/18/1998

FAIL

Name:	Rick Jackson
Title:	FIRE INSPECTOR
Phone:	794-1981

Rick Jackson

Denice - ###-#### fire lane and bad smoke detector in unit #4

Code Occupancy Approval

6/18/1998

FAIL

Name:
Title:
Phone:

TRASH ENCLOSURE NOT IN NOR PARKING LOT STRIPING, NEEDS TO BOND FOR $300 + 10% = $330.

SUPER- Supervisor's review

6/18/1998

6/16/1998

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

reviewed slope and retaining wall with jim rogers. on site. this wall is supporting a surcharge and reguardless of height would require soil analisis and engineering. jim storey has given cn to provide the necessary engineering for this project. jim rogers provided excellent comentary on the project and will be a very valuable asset.

INSP - Final

6/10/1998

PEND

Name:
Title:
Phone:

RETAINING WALL EVALUATION by Jim Rogers Developer has cut into the toe of an existing slope and constructed a wall composed of manufactured blocks. I don't know if the intent was to build an actual retaining wall or if this is to function as a decorative wall. Although the wall is about 4 - 5 feet in vertical height; because of the slope above the property and what appears to be other utilities (sewer line??) buried in the slope, it should be designed as a retaining wall. Because the back of the homes are very close to the wall, around 10 feet or so, failure of the wall and slope could cause extensive damage. Suggestions are: 1. An engineering analysis of the slope from the toe of the wall to the top of the canal above the property should be made to determine slope stability. This would include a Unified Soil Classification of the soil, moisture content and other soil engineering properties. 2. If the analysis indicates a Factor of Safety (FOS) less than 1.5, an engineered retaining wall will probably be necessary. I do no believe the existing wall is sufficient to support the slope for the following reasons. A. The foundation of the wall is constructed of material that appears to be road base and although it may supply adequate support for the vertical load of the wall, it supplies no lateral support in which to resist the driving forces of the slope above the wall. In addition, as ground saturation below and above the wall occurs because of landscape irrigation, vertical settlement and distoration of the wall will take place. B. It looks as if frictional forces are the only thing which ties the wall into the gravel foundation, which is above the grass line. If the gravel erodes from under the wall, settlement and failure of the wall may occur. It appears some erosion of the gravel is already occuring. The above is based on a visual examination of the wall. I would have a few questions concerning how the wall was constucted. 1. Is each lift of blocks tied into the back fill with a geo-grid? If so, how far back into the fill does the grid extend? 2. What was the compacted density of the soil behind the wall? 3. What was the compacted density of the gravel foundation which supports the wall, how thick is it, is the bottom layer of the retaining wall blocks tied into the gravel foundation, and if so, what was used? Is the gravel foundation supported and seperated from the sub-grade on a geotextile? Was the sub-grade compacted and to what density? 4. Was an analysis of the wall made to determine if it supplied sufficient resisting forces greater than the slope driving force? Last - The geotextile under the gravel mulch above the wall only provides a slip plane for the mulch to move down slope on. This is already occuring. The gravel mulch will be a constant maintance problem to the owners.

INSP - Final

6/3/1998

6/4/1998

FAIL

Name:	Jim Storey
Title:	BLD-COM/RES INSPECTOR
Phone:	794-9490

Jim Storey

06/04/98 301 - Denise ###-#### C/N SAME AS BLD972160

INSP - Framing/Rough-in

2/23/1998

PASS

Name:	Jim Storey
Title:	BLD-COM/RES INSPECTOR
Phone:	794-9490

Jim Storey

/ / 301 - FRAM-OK FRAMING

INSP - Final

2/20/1998

2/23/1998

Name:	Jim Storey
Title:	BLD-COM/RES INSPECTOR
Phone:	794-9490

Jim Storey

02/20/98 301 - wrong insp requisted framing is what should have been req insp. c/n are complet and framing is approved.

INSP - Energy code compliance

2/20/1998

2/23/1998

PASS

Name:	Jim Storey
Title:	BLD-COM/RES INSPECTOR
Phone:	794-9490

Jim Storey

02/20/98 301 - thornton ###-#### INSL-OK INSULATION-ENERGY CODE

INSP - Framing/Rough-in

2/18/1998

2/19/1998

PASS

Name:	Jim Storey
Title:	BLD-COM/RES INSPECTOR
Phone:	794-9490

Jim Storey

02/19/98 301 - 02/18/98 301 - AL ###-####

INSP - Footings

12/30/1997

12/31/1997

PASS

Name:	Jim Storey
Title:	BLD-COM/RES INSPECTOR
Phone:	794-9490

Jim Storey

12/30/97 301 - READY AT 4:00 FDN -OK FOUNDATION ì

Inspection Record Card- Bld

12/30/1997

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Print Occupancy Form

12/30/1997

Name:
Title:
Phone:

INSP - Footings

12/23/1997

PASS

Name:	Jim Storey
Title:	BLD-COM/RES INSPECTOR
Phone:	794-9490

Jim Storey

12/23/97 301 - FDN -OK FOUNDATION

(F) Reprint permit

11/7/1997

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Issue PAID IN FULL permit

11/7/1997

Name:
Title:
Phone:

90 day tracking.............

7/22/1997

10/20/1997

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Print Pending Permit.LaserJet4

10/17/1997

PASS

Name:
Title:
Phone:

FILES

PLANS/APPL TAKEN TO FRONT DESK

10/17/1997

PASS

Name:
Title:
Phone:

ISSUE

Inspection Record Card- Bld

10/17/1997

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Routing - PLAN CHECK

10/16/1997

10/17/1997

PASS

Name:
Title:
Phone:

ISSUE

Print Occupancy Form

10/17/1997

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Plan assigned to (PRP)

7/25/1997

10/17/1997

PASS

Name:
Title:
Phone:

TO BEGIN ROUTING 10/17/97 07:24:14 PRP - this action updated by action script from <<>> in Case No. BLD97-2131

Routing - PUBLIC WORKS

10/14/1997

10/15/1997

PASS

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Routing Off Site - A.C.H.D

9/24/1997

10/14/1997

PASS

Name:
Title:
Phone:

fees paid #98-0073

Routing - PLAN CHECK

10/14/1997

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Routing - PUBLIC WORKS

9/17/1997

9/24/1997

FAIL

Name:
Title:
Phone:

NEEDS DRAINAGE PLAN REVISION.

Routing - FIRE

9/2/1997

9/17/1997

PASS

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Routing - PLUMBING

8/25/1997

8/28/1997

PASS

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Routing - PLANNING

8/18/1997

8/22/1997

PASS

Name:
Title:
Phone:

X-REF: CUP97-0004. APPROVED BY RC.

Routing - PUBLIC WORKS

7/25/1997

8/15/1997

FAIL

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Plan Reviewer's activity

7/25/1997

PASS

Name:
Title:
Phone:

REVIEWED PLANS WITH OWNER AFTER PRELIMINARY AND ARCH CORRECTIONS. BEGIN ROUTING.

Recd Pcfee & Taken To Pln CK

7/22/1997

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Application received

7/22/1997

Name:
Title:
Phone: