Boise PDS Online - BLD98-02352

Information based on query as of Thursday, July 18, 2024.

Permit Information

Permit Number	BLD98-02352
Status	Finaled
Name	DUNKLEY MUSIC
Site Address	410 S CAPITOL BLVD
Project Name
Customer Number
ePlanReview	No
Description	To perform interior and exterior remodel of existing, combined, buildings of different types of construction, housing retail/storage/repair of musical instruments and an assembly room for recitals per approved plans on file. Work to include adding a 92 sq.ft. entry to the north side of building, performing selective demolition and new construction of interior partitions to rearrange the room layouts and complete the construction, opening & penetration protection to create a 4-hour area separation wall between Type VN (South side @4.458 s.f.) & III-N (North Side @ 13,876 s.f.)Construction. To provide two complying accessible restrooms. All per approved plans and engineering analysis of structural modifications. NOTE: This building is partially fire sprinklered in the northern most retail, restroom and recital rooms. (P.C.#539-98)/drs

Contact Information

See Activities list for contact information

Permit Details Project Related Cases Activities Conditions Parcel Fees Valuation Documents Permit Summary Report

Show Inspection Activities Only

Description

Received

Requested

Completed

AM/PM

Disposition

Assigned To

Permanent occupancy

3/13/2000

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Perm. Occ. Cert. #8160 issued 3-13-00 to Dunkley Music.

Code Occupancy Approval

3/9/2000

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

No planning permit in relation to this building permit. All exterior work complete. Pass.

BLD-Final

3/9/2000

PASS

Name:
Title:
Phone:

made ok signed the occ req perm

Permanent Occupancy

3/9/2000

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

(F) Reprint permit

3/7/2000

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Carol M. requested a copy of the permit to refer to when doing occ. insp.

BLD-Conference

10/19/1999

PART

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Discuss req. for final tie remodel signoff with Mr. Dunkley

Case Summary (BLD)

9/13/1999

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

INSP-Final Inspection

7/26/1999

7/27/1999

PASS

Name:	Rick Jackson
Title:	FIRE INSPECTOR
Phone:	794-1981

Rick Jackson

Tony ###-#### occ approved

INSP-Final Inspection

7/21/1999

FAIL

Name:	Rick Jackson
Title:	FIRE INSPECTOR
Phone:	794-1981

Rick Jackson

TONY ###-#### exit signs in recital hall; remove FDC and bell; 3 hour door not latching

INSP - Foundation

6/3/1999

FAIL

Name:
Title:
Phone:

lack of support for existing beam structural engineer will evaluate, existing construction

Plan resubmittals received

5/19/1999

Name:
Title:
Phone:

RECEIVED TWO COPIES OF SHEET A-1 AND ONE COPY EACH OF GENERAL TIMBER BEAM, STEEL BEAM DESIGN, AND FOOTING ANALYSIS. ROUTED TO PERRY PAINE. KMM

SUPER- Supervisor's review

5/17/1999

Name:
Title:
Phone:

starting ceiling grid. ok

INSP-Conference

4/12/1999

PART

Name:	Rick Jackson
Title:	FIRE INSPECTOR
Phone:	794-1981

Rick Jackson

discussed with Perry and architect about sprinkler removal from part of the building - requested letter from owner.

INSP - Framing/Rough-in

2/16/1999

2/17/1999

PART

Name:
Title:
Phone:

02/16/99 338 - part made ok need to have plans that do match the constru

SUPER- Supervisor's review

2/4/1999

Name:
Title:
Phone:

reviewed mis applyed glass block installation at dunkly music. remove and install per listing

INSP - Framing/Rough-in

1/28/1999

2/1/1999

PART

Name:
Title:
Phone:

02/01/99 338 - made ok to cover drywall with fire blocking in place need

INSP - Foundation

12/29/1998

12/30/1998

PASS

Name:
Title:
Phone:

12/30/98 333 - footing ok

Issue PAID IN FULL permit

11/9/1998

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Print Occupancy Form

11/9/1998

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Inspection Record Card- Bld

11/9/1998

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Plan resubmittals requested

11/6/1998

Name:
Title:
Phone:

PLANS/APPL TAKEN TO FRONT DESK

11/6/1998

PASS

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Approved with conditions as noted and attached. Routing to permit desk for processing.

Plan resubmittals received

11/6/1998

PEND

Name:
Title:
Phone:

RECEIVED RESUBMITTALS FROM RON THURBERS OFFICE, JULIE SHAW, FORWARDED SAME TO DAN STUART.DAR, 11/06/98

Meeting

11/6/1998

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Met with Julie to review special inspection document & footing details. Will begin orginizing plans & new submittals for processing for permits.

Plan resubmittals received

11/6/1998

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Routing - PLAN CHECK

11/3/1998

11/6/1998

PASS

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Received required clarifications from architect & structural engineer. Processing for issuance of permits.

Telephone call

11/6/1998

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Called Julie to provide further clarification on hold down footing sizes & engineering and the special inspection agreement still not submitted with previous documents .She will get to me by this P.M.

Plan assigned to (DRS)

8/10/1998

11/6/1998

PASS

Name:	Dan Stuart
Title:	PLAN REVIEWER II
Phone:	395-7873

Dan Stuart

11/06/98 18:02:47 DRS - this action updated by action script from <<>> in Case No. BLD98-2352

Plan resubmittals requested

11/4/1998

PEND

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Clarifications & details required from Julie to include new submittals from engineer & architect.

Routing - PLAN CHECK

10/9/1998

11/4/1998

FAIL

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Finished second review of plans; a meeting with Julie Shaw, architect: and phone conversation with engineer, Steve Call. Plans are on hold until further clarifications & details are provided.

Telephone call

11/3/1998

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Called Steve Call, structural engineer to clarify the engineering sheets presented for structural additions or modifications to the job. Engineering sheets did not clearly indicate the specific areas being reviewed; what the design formulas & finding were to represent; were shear walls began and ended & placement of hold-downs referenced in the engineering; header sizes for loads of new storage area floor; special inspection requirements based on structural specification design notes submitted and the need for a special inspection program with specific methods & frequency of inspections called out by the engineer not just the code reference with a note to comply. Steve stated that the concrete could have a design value of 2500 psi, not requiring S. I. I ask him to specify that under his design stamp and to clarify that the 3000 psi called for was not structural but for durability because of the areas where the concrete would be exposed to the exterior. It was also indicated that the epoxy requirements were for securing the bolts in place per his preference and he felt that very little structural loading is being handled by the design. He is to clarify to show S.I. isn"t required. Welding does require S.I. and Steve will provide specifics on frequency of inspections, certifications of welders, use of welding materials, etc.; also to designate the size of plate required at top of tube steel columns, to field review excavations for determination of soils testing requirements under new footings (his spec calls for 90% compaction under footing). Needs will not be known until the floors are cut & concrete removed; Steve is to provide header designs for openings at doors & stair on sheet A2

Meeting

11/3/1998

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Invited architect, Julie Shaw to the office to review plan discrepencies from new resubmittals received on 10/27/98 & changes for floor joist size & spaceing red lined on plans to bring into conformance with engineering design - Changed 11-7/8" TJI's @ 16" 0.c. to 14" TJI @ 12" o.c. Plans indicated incorrect or unclear section references for walls & footing details, special inspection information had not been provided as required; ceiling joists over FOYER #130 & the West end of INSTRUMENT REPAIR #126B does not indicate if part of storage area and if not does not indicate separation of areas to prevent storage in area not designed for loads; need header design across opening at same location; reviewed method to determine occupant load of RECITAL HALL (93) to be posted in room; discussed the use of the basement as storage as indicated on plan. Julie said the label was a mistake that the area was used only as mechanical service to the building and per exception #5, 1003.1, UBC, a second exit is not needed (we redlined out storage and changed to mechanical with note on plan; reviewed detail J/A3 for guardrail and need to provide method to resist lateral loads (suggested extending wall framing thru floor sheating at equal intervals and tieing the frame member to the floor joist & rim joist - Julie to provide detail); resubmittal keynote D/D1 indicates a lintel height of 9' for new openings thru infill masonry walls, reference "D". This leaves a section of masonry below the existing concrete beam and the engineering design indicates all loose masonry is to be removed and lintel is attached with thru-bolts to each side for added support, with 6x6 tube steel columns under lintels, This will be handled as a defered submital while Julie discusses with owner and the engineer how this portion is to be done. Know work will be done in this area of the project until clarification & new details if required are submitted and approved by plan review.; Reviewed meaning of draft stop access door note "L"/A-1. Will need to be self closing and latching per code; Reviewed door hardware & automatic closing device requirements for the doors in the combination Horizontal exit / 4-hour Area Separation wall. Needs heat detection device's and placed per section 713.6.1. Reviewed with Floyd Varley at my desk. Needs to be a type of heat detector / relay system that is approved for use with 110 volt systemas exists in building to avoid the cost of approved low voltage system; reviewed changes needed to door schedule and that the engineering calcs from Steve Call indicated some hold down devices on sheet 8 that are not indicated on plans; and header details that were called out on plans appeared to be of incorrect size for the floor loads or the size is not specified in the detail. I told Julie I would talk to the structural engineer to review questions but that she would need to follow up to make sure inforation was received and shee details it on plans per the engineering.

Plan Reviewer's activity

10/30/1998

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Began inserting new plans submittals and reviewing them in between customer service for walk-ins and phone calls. 11/3/98 - Finsihed preliminary review of the resubmittals & found that there are still several structural & fire/ life safety concerns that will need to be addressed. Called Steve Call, engineer to reviewe concerns & further information needed and Called Julie Shaw to invite her in to review plans with me concerning deficiencies or incoorrect information. Julie will provide additional plans.

Plan resubmittals received

10/28/1998

Name:
Title:
Phone:

received one copy of structural calcs. ROUTED TO DAN S. KMM

Plan resubmittals received

10/27/1998

PEND

Name:
Title:
Phone:

RECEIVED RESUBMITTALS FROM JULIANNE SHAW, OF RON THURBER AND ASSOCIATES, FORWARDED SAME TO DAN STUART. DAR 10/27/98

Plan Review Completed(1st rev)

10/8/1998

FAIL

Name:
Title:
Phone:

UBC items

Routing - FIRE

10/7/1998

10/8/1998

PASS

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Plan resubmittals requested

10/7/1998

PEND

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Plan Reviewer's activity

10/7/1998

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Have spent several months and many meetings & phone conversations with Julianne Shaw of Ron Thurber & Associates Architect, trying to review design possibilities to bring the building into minimum compliance in order to issue a certificate of occupancy, a condition placed on the existing structure by a fire department inspection survey by Steve Keuter. At a final meeting with Juli & Mr. Dunkley a plan of action was determined (I thought). I was called by Juli and notified that Mr. Dunkley has decided to bring in an interior design professional to propose a complete upgrade to the store interior and to determine best use of all areas. The project sat again. On August 4, 1998 plans were submitted for review and permit. Clarifications & engineering are required as a part of the submittal as well as answereing other code questions. On Oct. 2, 1998, the initial plan review was started nd on Oct. 7 the plan review comments were sent by mail & fax to Juli. Plans will be forwarded to the Fire Dept. for there review.

Routing - PLAN CHECK

10/2/1998

10/7/1998

PEND

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Finished preliminary review and faxed comments to Juli as well as mailed a copy. Forwarding plans to fire dept. for review.

Telephone call

10/7/1998

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Talked with Juli after she received the fax with required additional information requirements. She postponed the meeting that had been scheduled for 8:30 A.M. on Thursday the 8th. She will reschedule after she has a chance to get comment to structural engineer, Steve Call and get his response.

Print Pending Permit.LaserJet4

10/7/1998

PEND

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Routing - PLAN CHECK

9/9/1998

10/2/1998

PEND

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Picked up plan to beginn review.

Routing - PLANNING

9/8/1998

9/9/1998

PASS

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Per revised site plan in bldg. sets.

Routing - PUBLIC WORKS

8/31/1998

9/1/1998

PASS

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Routing - PLANNING

8/11/1998

8/28/1998

FAIL

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Have been working with the architect regarding parking lot stall design. Still need final approvals.

Additional plans submitted

8/24/1998

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Additional plans submitted in response to Planning review process and failure.

Plan routing begun/TENANTS

8/10/1998

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Route to PLANNING, PUBLIC WORKS, PLAN CHECK and FIRE.

Application received

8/4/1998

Name:
Title:
Phone: