BLD-Final | 5/17/2000 | 5/18/2000 | 5/18/2000 | A | PASS |
|
|
|
###-#### c/c#19340 5/19/00 8:29:25 AM
|
FIRE-Final Inspection | 5/17/2000 | 5/18/2000 | 5/18/2000 | A | PASS |
Rick Jackson
|
|
|
###-####
|
BLD-Final | 1/6/2000 | 1/7/2000 | 1/7/2000 | A | FAIL |
|
|
|
CLIFF-- ###-#### FN OCC WITH 408 AND ALL CONTRS
|
FIRE-Final Inspection | 1/6/2000 | 1/7/2000 | 1/7/2000 | A | FAIL |
Rick Jackson
|
|
|
CLIFF ###-#### FN OCC FIRE. Need items under permit Bld99-00224 completed first.
|
FIRE-Final Inspection | 1/3/2000 | 1/6/2000 | 1/6/2000 | A | FAIL |
Rick Jackson
|
|
|
cliff ###-####. Need to complete items under BLD99-00224 for final. Tested vesda detection system- ok.
|
BLD-Conference | 11/1/1999 | 11/1/1999 | 11/1/1999 | A | PART |
|
|
|
Spoke with Don (super w/McAlcam) have been waiting on new doors and hardware- should call for final in next 10-20 days
|
Fee Review-notes | 11/2/1998 | | 4/28/1999 | | |
|
|
|
|
INSP-Conference | 1/11/1999 | 1/11/1999 | 1/11/1999 | A | PART |
Rick Jackson
|
|
|
checked status of alarms told them to get approved plans; requested resubmittal on 1 hour wall by corridor
|
INSP - Framing/Rough-in | 12/3/1998 | 12/4/1998 | 12/4/1998 | A | PASS |
|
|
|
12/04/98 333 - FRAM-OK FRAMING
|
Issue PAID IN FULL permit | | | 10/5/1998 | | |
|
|
|
|
(F) Reprint permit | | | 10/5/1998 | | |
|
|
|
|
Inspection Record Card- Bld | | | 10/5/1998 | | |
|
|
|
|
Print Occupancy Form | | | 10/5/1998 | | |
|
|
|
|
Routing - PUBLIC WORKS | 10/2/1998 | | 10/2/1998 | | PASS |
|
|
|
Dan Stuart delivered the plans to Louise Waldorf for review of fluids to be added to the existing system by installation of the new chiller & HVAC units, if any, prior to processing for issuance of a permit. Plans returned by Bev Dugger. Plans okay. Processing for issuance of permit.
|
Routing - PLANNING | 10/1/1998 | | 10/2/1998 | | PASS |
|
|
|
Entry by Dan Stuart. I reviewed the project with Ticia Canady and there were no problems based on our understanding of the project and viewing similat vetilation shutters already existing on the South wall that could be compared to the proposed installations. I signed the plans as approved by Planning.
|
PLANS/APPL TAKEN TO FRONT DESK | | | 10/2/1998 | | PASS |
|
|
|
Processing for permit issuance based on plan review comments attached to plans and redline comments on plans.
|
Plan resubmittals received | | | 10/2/1998 | | |
|
|
|
Received copy of letter from Cator Ruma & Associates to Floyd Varley indicated as being part of Sept. 30 submittal. Letter is in response to Fire Dept. plan review comments on sprinkler, detection and alarm systems and need for new plans. Response is the information will be provided to the field inspector for fire dept. review - defered submittal. Included with plans.
|
Routing - PLAN CHECK | 9/30/1998 | | 10/2/1998 | | PASS |
|
|
|
Received plan review comment response from Chris Thiesen. Did not receive correct number of copies or all items noted as being included in resubmittals. Chris came by on the 1 to review with me> I noted deficiencies with him and agreed to defere submittals to be provided within the newt week - by 10/09/98 - and I made red line comments on the approved plans for notification of code sections & concerns for the inspector & the contractor and agreed to issue the permit. Processing for issuance.
|
Plan assigned to (DRS) | 9/3/1998 | | 10/2/1998 | | PASS |
Dan Stuart
|
|
|
10/02/98 15:03:32 DRS - this action updated by action script from <<>> in Case No. BLD98-2646
|
Plan resubmittals requested | | | 10/1/1998 | | PEND |
|
|
|
Met with Chris Theisen & an associate today at about 2:30 p.m. He was in town and had been the one to deliver the incomplete response to the office on 09/30/98. I reviewed with him concerns about continually receiving incomplete plans even after we discussed items over the phone. I need two copies of all new submittal items so copies can be placed in city and contractor copies when approved. Structural engineers comments on design and special inspection for welding, high strength bolts and Hilti kwik expansion bolts as part of the structural support for the new chiller unit were inadequate. Since this is considered an important communication structure, and essential to keep funtioning in the event of an earthquake (table 23-K ' 91 UBC), I told Chris that the design engineer could provide an observation inspection (as allowed in the 1997 UBC) with written statement of review and approval acceptance of the work as per his design and code. Chris would provide additional information by Monday the 5 of October, 1998 and provide defered submittal information to the field inspectors and under condition that a final inspection and approval will not be given until the needed data is provided & accepted.
|
Meeting | | | 10/1/1998 | | |
|
|
|
Met with Tempra Wilson to see if the new 6' by 8' opnings for mechanical ventilation in the exterior walls on the South and East face are acceptable without additional information and review by the applicant. We had previously discussed the changeout of existing single pane windows with new double pane insulated of the same size. This was not a problem but the other new openings were not discussed with the coty in the preliminary meeting. Tempra wants to discuss with Tricia Canady regarding historical district any any effect there might be for the proposal. If no problems Tempra will come by and sign off on plans.
|
Print Pending Permit.LaserJet4 | | | 10/1/1998 | | |
|
|
|
|
Meeting | | | 10/1/1998 | | |
|
|
|
Reviewed the installation of new luvers for mechanical ventilation through the South and East sides of the building. Tempra Wilson will review with Tricia Canaday since this is a building in a historical district to see if she thinks any problems will arise from the new openings and let me know on the 2 of October.
|
Plan Reviewer's activity | | | 10/1/1998 | | |
|
|
|
This building has been an ongoing project of slow cooperation between AT&T, US Wst & Boise City for several months. A letter of agreement on file from Aug. of 1992 created specific requirements for converting the building to a high rise because of the new office use on the sixth floor of the building. One of the major considerations was a complying sprinkler system throughout the building unless areas covered under ommision allowed in Section 3804, '91 UBC complied with stated requirement. This project was to have been nearing completion and everytime we talked to AT&T / US West personel we understood this was the case except for battery room sprinkler system which the tenant/owners felt did not require sprinklers. This matter was reclarrified in the late summer of 1997 prior to Bob Garrisons retirement in a meeting with Jim Hernandez, Dave Miller, Bob Garrison and Myself and a time extension of one year was requested and given for getting sprinklers into the battery room and providing an approved sprinkler & detection plan to the city and complete the same. Several meetings later and review of the same old questions we discovered the sprinkler & smoke detection progress had not been as far along as previously believed. Sprinkler system installation is currently in progress (beyond the year extension date of August 20, 1998 and Floyd Varley copied me with a letter he sent ot the designer on Sep 30, 1998 rejecting the smoke detection & alarm plan presented for approval. Plans were incomplete and improperly designed. The Saga continues.
|
Telephone call | | | 10/1/1998 | | |
|
|
|
Call to Chris Theisen office to let him know of resubmittal dificiencies. Chris not in - left message for him to call.
|
Plan resubmittals received | | | 9/30/1998 | | PEND |
|
|
|
Reveived incomplete response from Architect. Not enough copies of new plans, letter noted to be part of package was not included, fire wall location still not clarified on plans for third & fifth floors, no comment as to sprinkler system throughout the fifth floor as told in phone conversation of 09/27/98 when I discussed not receiving a response yet to the plan review comments.
|
Telephone call | | | 9/27/1998 | | |
|
|
|
Talked with Chris Theisen concerning time delay for response to plan review and that plans submitted did not have complete information after all the previous meeting that had been held concerning the building and the 1992 Letter of Agreement. Plan submittals will be turned in next week sometime.
|
Plan resubmittals requested | | | 9/18/1998 | | PEND |
|
|
|
Faxed & mailed copy of preliminary plan view to Chris Thiesen for response.
|
Routing - PLAN CHECK | 9/17/1998 | | 9/18/1998 | | PEND |
|
|
|
Finished preliminary plan review. Faxed & mailed copy of required new submittals required to Chris Theisen, H&L Architects.
|
Routing - PLAN CHECK | 9/10/1998 | | 9/17/1998 | | PEND |
|
|
|
Picked up plans to begin review.
|
Routing - FIRE | 9/3/1998 | | 9/10/1998 | | PASS |
|
|
|
need alarm sys plans - vesda system
|
Plan routing begun/TENANTS | | | 9/3/1998 | | |
|
|
|
This plan to be reviewed by FIRE and then PLAN CHECK.
|
Application received | | | 8/28/1998 | | |
|
|
|
|