Information based on query as of Wednesday, July 17, 2024.
Permit Information
Permit NumberBLD99-00021
StatusExpired
Name DRAPER D CRAIG & SHELLY L
Site Address 555 W PARKCENTER BLVD
Project Name 
Customer NumberSEE COMMENTS
ePlanReviewNo
Description
To remodel an existing two story, 36,484 square foot building, used as a fitness center. There is 26,898 sq. ft. first floor and 9,586 sq. ft. second floor. The building is partially sprinkled with part of the remodel project to include a full NFPA #13 complying sprinkler system to be used as a substitution for the one-hour fire-resistive requirement. Remove interior walls, bearing & non-bearing, as shown on plans, install new steel structural beams to create one large room for basketball out of three existing courts and a large center exercise & exercise equipment room. To add office cubicles for sales offices and walls for new managemnet and equipment office. Enlarge 'Child Play Land' area for child care use while persons use fitness center. This is not a day care where parents or anyone can drop off kids while they go elsewhere. To install two accessible restroom, shower & locker rooms on the first floor. All per approved plans to include notes and attachments on plans on file. PC#99-005/drs ........................ (P.C.#005-99)
Contact Information
See Activities list for contact information
Show Inspection Activities Only
DescriptionReceivedRequestedCompletedAM/PMDispositionAssigned To 
Case Summary (BLD)  9/4/2013 DONE
Case Summary (BLD)  7/11/2008  
Case Summary (BLD)  5/8/2008  
Case Summary (BLD)  3/11/2008  
Case Summary (BLD)  6/29/2005  
Case Summary (BLD)  5/26/2005  
Case Summary (BLD)  5/26/2005  
Permanent occupancy  3/14/2003 DONE
Perm. Occ. Cert. #9586 issued 3-14-03 to 24 Hour Fitness.
BLD-Final3/12/20033/12/20033/12/2003PPASS
DetailsJim Storey
art; Phone #: ###-#### Internet Inspection Request from: Darla Downs please fax copy of signed cooupancy card ###-####
Permanent Occupancy 3/12/20033/12/2003 DONE
Details
Plan Reviewer's activity  3/12/2003  
Project had not been completed and approved by structural inspection in 1999 / 2000. Aging inspection request brought project up for inspection. Original approved plans nots and modification no longer available a job site. Inspector Jim Storey reviewed archives for requirements. The new parking garage building adjacent to the fitness center did not happen and a note was in the file indicating the project was not constructed. With no garage construction the original requirement for an assumed property line between the structures was not needed and the 1-hour exterior wall with opening protection requirment no longer applied. Jim brought me a copy of the approval note from records concerning this issue. I had approved the notice and put a copy of the approval in our records and submitted a copy for the inspector to return to job site for inclusion in site plans. I am entering this note as part of record of change approval on 6/30/99. drs
BLD-Final3/10/20033/11/20033/11/2003AFAIL
DetailsJim Storey
###-#### ###-#### need panic hardware at pool stair east 1 st floor door/ smoke seal 2 nd floor mech rm pool area. card on site with nickol. 3/11/2003 10:50:17 AM
Print Occupancy Form  3/11/2003 DONE
CHANGE STATUS TO (ISS)  2/7/2003 DONE
per George
Fee Review-notes2/4/1999 2/8/2002 DONE
FIRE-Final Inspection1/25/20001/26/20001/26/2000APASS
DetailsRick Jackson
8:30
FIRE-Final Inspection1/18/20001/18/20001/18/2000PFAIL
DetailsRick Jackson
need annual sprinkler inspection; supervisory service for sprinklers; NFPA 72
FIRE-Final Inspection1/12/20001/13/20001/13/2000PFAIL
DetailsRick Jackson
ready at 3 Marty ###-#### Rescheduled for 1/18/00. 1/14/00 2:36:59 PM
FIRE-Final Inspection11/30/199912/2/199912/2/1999AFAIL
DetailsRick Jackson
tracy ###-#### fn fire Alarms not ready; sprinklers not complete.
FIRE-Final Inspection11/3/199911/4/199911/4/1999ACANC
DetailsRick Jackson
DEBEST FIRE ###-#### -PER RICK 9:00? Not ready for final
FIRE-Sprinkler Rough-in11/4/199911/4/199911/4/1999AFAIL
DetailsRick Jackson
Hydro test ok. Sprinkler R/I fail- not fully sprinklered (storage room); wrong heads in several areas.
INSP-Conference8/23/19998/24/19998/24/1999APART
DetailsRick Jackson
ART, ###-#### PLEASE CALL PRIOR. discussed alarm submittals - contractor to submit
INSP - Framing/Rough-in8/19/19998/20/19998/20/1999PCANC
DetailsRuss Owen
08/20/99 407 - Scheduled by Hello!. Contact phone is [8411354].
INSP - Final8/17/19998/17/19998/17/1999PCANC
DetailsRuss Owen
08/17/99 407 - art-- call 1st before insp ###-#### pre fin-1st floor
INSP-Conference7/7/19997/7/19997/7/1999PPART
DetailsRick Jackson
discussed location of exit lights and emergency lights
INSP - Framing/Rough-in6/23/19996/24/19996/24/1999ACANC
DetailsRuss Owen
06/24/99 407 - trans to 301.
INSP - Framing/Rough-in6/15/19996/16/19996/17/1999APART
DetailsJim Storey
06/16/99 301 - CONFERENCE Art Buswell ###-#### ok to rock bathroom
INSP - Concrete4/29/19994/30/19994/30/1999AFAIL
DetailsRuss Owen
04/30/99 407 - not ready.
Issue PAID IN FULL permit  4/13/1999
Print Occupancy Form  4/9/1999
Telephone call  4/9/1999
talked to william gave dollar amount
Inspection Record Card- Bld  4/9/1999
Routing - PLAN CHECK3/9/1999 4/9/1999 PASS
Approved as noted and attached. Received response from architect to outstanding items 4/7/99. Reviewed and inserted into plans. Routing for permits.
Plan assigned to (DRS)1/8/1999 4/8/1999 PASS
DetailsDan Stuart
04/08/99 18:07:29 DRS - this action updated by action script from <<>> in Case No. BLD99-0021
PLANS/APPL TAKEN TO FRONT DESK  4/8/1999 PASS
Processing for issuance of p[ermit based on plans notes & attachements.
Plan resubmittals received  4/7/1999
Received additional plans & comments concerning outstanding items.
Meeting  4/1/1999
Met with Ed Owen, 24-hour fitness head rep, Pat McKeegan architect for proposed new garage; rep from Hilbers Const.; and Monte Von Struck of Project management to review outstanding items and to discuss process once items are answered. Difficult time contacting architect Ken Douglas and this has delayed the plans resubmittal prosess. Plans will be in by next wednesday at the latest. I will process as soon as received.
Plan resubmittals requested  3/24/1999
Completed second review of new plans & response from architect. Mailed copy to architect. Architect was not in office and his phone & fax number are the same. He does not leave his fax on when he is not in.
Telephone call  3/22/1999
Call from Ken Douglass. Told him I was working up a response to last resubmittal for questions that were not answered completeley or not at all from March 4, 199 review. I ask if he had visited the site so he would understand what I was asking him. He told me he had. I will send the second review comments to him as soon as completed. Mr. Douglas was responding to information I had given to Mr. Von Struck, the project manager, when we had done a preliminary review of the plans and I asked him specific questions and shared some concerns. My written comments went to Mr. Douglas the day before the plan resubmittals were turned in for review. I told Mr. Cowling of Project management Group that I had not received a formal response to my questions but I would look at what was submitted between jobs I was now doing but Mr. Douglas should address My plan review.
Telephone call  3/19/1999
Call from Mr. Cowling concerning 24-hour fitness. Told him I was still waiting for response from architect.
Plan resubmittals received  3/15/1999
Received additional information on a boiler room located on the second floor by the locker rooms and it BTU capacity which would require a 1-hour occupancy separation from the rest of the facility. This was from Mr. Cowling and not from the architect.
Plan resubmittals received  3/12/1999
Received partial written response to my March 4, 1999 preliminary plan review. It was from Mr. Cowling of Project Management Group not the architect Mr. Douglass.
Plan resubmittals received  3/12/1999
Received resubmittal for plan review. Received only one copy.
Routing - FIRE3/4/1999 3/9/1999 PASS
need fire alarms and chlorine room details as delayed submittal.
Plan Review Completed(1st rev)  3/9/1999 FAIL
ubc issue
Telephone call  3/4/1999
Mr. Von Struck called to see if I had received additional plans. I told him I had but that I had kust sent my preliminary review list to the architect and the architect neded to submit a response to the plan review comments. I had received only on copy. I had sent the plans on to fire dept. for review.
Plan resubmittals received  3/4/1999
RECEIVED ONE COPY OF REVISED SHEETS A1.0, A1.1A, A1.2, A1.3, A1.4, A1.5, A1.13, E1.1, E1.2, M1.0, M2.0 ROUTED TO DAN S. KMM
Print Pending Permit.LaserJet4  3/3/1999 HOLD
Routing - PLAN CHECK3/1/1999 3/3/1999 HOLD
Began plan review for proposed remodel project. Routing plan to fire dept. for comments on required submittals for alarm & sprinkler system.
Telephone call  3/2/1999
Received phone message from Monte Von Struck stating that new plans were sent to Brent Jackson for clarifications of concerns we had discussed on the 22 of February and Brent would bring them in.
Plan resubmittals received  2/22/1999
Received two complete sets of new plans for review and comments. Mr Von Struck will have new sheets submitted to clarify the assumed property line concerns and modifications required because of the garage location. I will proceed to review the plans and send a preliminary plan review comment list to the architect.
Meeting  2/22/1999
Met with Mr. Monte Von Struck of Project Management Group, ;isted on the permit application as the contractor for the 24-hour fitness remodel project. He had brougkt in a new set of plans for review that included the structural design information. I set down to review the concerns that I had about the location of the parking garage and how it could effect the locations of new openings shown on the remodel plan, the required wall construction and possible parapet requirements. There are alos some discrepancies between room locations & use on the original plans on file and the plans submitted for review. Mr. VonStruck said he would visit the site to verify conditions and get with the architect to provide us with needed clarifications.
Routing - PLAN CHECK1/12/1999 2/18/1999 HOLD
Meeting with Pat McKeegan, Jeff Jones, Marlene Southard, John Menard, Tempra Wilson, Brian Murphy, Floyd Varley & Dan Stuart concerning the proposal to add a new enclosed parking structure on the same property as the existing 24-hour fitness center. The proposed remodel of the existing building will be effected by the location and opening of the proposed parking structure. An assumed property line will need to be established to determine where opeings & penetrations are allowed and protection requirements for new and existing openings. Mr. McKeegan said he was not involved with the remodel in relation to the existing building. This is not correct in the sense that one has a direct effect on the other and the common questions involving the property line location and construction requirments will need to be resolved before the projects can move forward. Mr. Jones stated that the city could start a structural review to circulate to our outside engineering consultant but that this would be without any guanantee's until the above noted concerns are resolved. Pat was to conference with the owner and other involved parties before we could meet again.
Meeting  2/4/1999
Meeting with Mr. Bret Jackson of Hilbers Inc., remodel construction company for the existing fitness facility. Mr. Hilbers wanted a demolition permit. There are to many questions about what walls are proposed for demo and if they are structural; the diferences of the existing construction versus what was required (V-1 hour required vs. V-N actual and partial sprinkler system; walls that are bearing cannot be removed until plans for new support system are approved; structural design plans were not presented with the plans for review. Mr. Jackson was aware of the lack of engineering and had gone to a private engineering firm, Atwood-Hinsman-Jones for a design. The footings were redlined on a plan and the design calcs were not completed to present for review. I informed Mr. Jackson concerning the concerns and told him the engineering data would need to be sent to the architect of record and made a part of the plans under his stamp or the structural engineers but the architect would need to verify details on plans and resubmit. Mr. Jackson asked if the architect, Kenneth Douglas could call me for review purposes. I told him that would be fine.
Plan routing begun/TENANTS  1/8/1999
Route to PUBLIC WORKS, PLAN CHECK and FIRE.
Application received  1/5/1999 PASS
Plans ACCEPTED BY PLAN TECH  1/5/1999 PASS
Routing - PUBLIC WORKS1/8/1999 1/12/1998 PASS