Boise PDS Online - BLD99-00224

Information based on query as of Thursday, July 18, 2024.

Permit Information

Permit Number	BLD99-00224
Status	Finaled
Name	A T & T
Site Address	619 W BANNOCK ST
Project Name	AT&T BUILDING-1ST FL
Customer Number
ePlanReview	No
Description	TO CONSTRUCT A HOUR HOUROCCUPANCY SEPARATION WALL AROUND A 96 SQ. FT. AREA TO CREATE THE FIRE COMMAND CENTER ROOM FOR PLACEMENT OF ALL ALARM PANELS, SUPERVISORY PANELS, FLOOR LAYOUT MAPS, ETC. REQUIRED AS A CONDITION OF THE 1992 LETTER OF AGREEMENT ON FILE AS A RESULT OF THE EXISTING STRUCTURE BEING RECLASSIFIED AS AN EXISTING HIGH RISE STRUCTURE WITH AN OFFICE FLOOR LOCATED GREATER THAN 75 FEET ABOVE THE GROUND. RESUBMITTALS WERE RECEIVED MARCH 4, 1999 SHOWING CORRECTIONS FOR THE COMMAND CENTER AND ALSO INCLUDED THE LOCATIONS OF THE 1-HOUR OCCUPANCY SEPARATION WALLS REQUIRED BETWEEN THE SPRINKLED AND NON SPRINKLED AREAS AS DESIGNATED BY SMALL PLANS ATTACHED TO FRONT. ALSO INCLUDES A DOOR UPGRADE FOR THE SEPARATIONS AND WILL REQUIRE REVIEW OF ALL DUCT PENETRATIONS OF THE OCCUPANCY SEPARATION WALLS TO VERIFY FIRE DAMPERS (1991 UBC) AND ACCESS DOORS. tHE COMPLETION OF THE ABOVE NOTED ITEMS IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE ALARM, DETECTION SPRINKLER & TESTING FOR APPROVAL OF ALL THESE ITEMS WILL RESULT IN THE ISSUANCE OF A "LETTER OF COMPLETION / COMPLIANCE" TO THE TENANT'S, A.T.&T. AND U.S.WEST, FOR THE CONDITIONS OF THE 1992 "LETTER OF AGREEMENT". ALL PER APPROVED PLANS NOTES AND ATTACHMENTS. PC#99-068/drs

Contact Information

See Activities list for contact information

Permit Details Project Related Cases Activities Conditions Parcel Fees Valuation Documents Permit Summary Report

Show Inspection Activities Only

Description

Received

Requested

Completed

AM/PM

Disposition

Assigned To

BLD-Final

5/17/2000

5/18/2000

PASS

Name:
Title:
Phone:

###-#### c/c# 19339 5/19/00 8:29:55 AM

FIRE-Final Inspection

5/17/2000

5/18/2000

PASS

Name:	Rick Jackson
Title:	FIRE INSPECTOR
Phone:	794-1981

Rick Jackson

###-####

Letter of compliance

5/18/2000

PASS

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Letter of Compliance #19339 issued 5-18-00.

BLD-Final

1/6/2000

1/7/2000

FAIL

Name:
Title:
Phone:

JERRY FISHER ###-#### FN OCC WITH 409 AND ALL CONTRACTORS

FIRE-Final Inspection

1/6/2000

1/7/2000

FAIL

Name:	Rick Jackson
Title:	FIRE INSPECTOR
Phone:	794-1981

Rick Jackson

JERRY ###-#### FIRE FN. Doors not operational/ installed as required per plans.

Fee Review-notes

6/21/1999

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

INSP-Alarm Testing

5/20/1999

FAIL

Name:	Rick Jackson
Title:	FIRE INSPECTOR
Phone:	794-1981

Rick Jackson

audibility poor in 1st floor; pressurization fans not working properly;

INSP-Alarm Testing

5/18/1999

FAIL

Name:	Rick Jackson
Title:	FIRE INSPECTOR
Phone:	794-1981

Rick Jackson

alarms not complete -

INSP - Framing/Rough-in

4/22/1999

PART

Name:
Title:
Phone:

04/26/99 338 - made ok to install door at the fire room

Issue PAID IN FULL permit

3/8/1999

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Print Occupancy Form

3/8/1999

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Telephone call

3/8/1999

Name:
Title:
Phone:

talked to bob gave dollar amount

Plan assigned to (DRS)

1/27/1999

3/5/1999

PASS

Name:	Dan Stuart
Title:	PLAN REVIEWER II
Phone:	395-7873

Dan Stuart

03/05/99 21:03:58 DRS - this action updated by action script from <<>> in Case No. BLD99-0224

Telephone call

3/5/1999

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Call from Steve of H&L Architects to verify that I will send list of doors needing to be corrected to H&L Arch.

Print Pending Permit.LaserJet4

3/5/1999

PASS

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Processing for issuance of a permit.

Telephone call

3/5/1999

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Call from Steve Dunbar from H&L Architect to check on my review of the door analysis they had done for the building and to fax information to him noting which particular doors would be required to be upgraded as part of the 1992 "Letter of Agreement". I completed by review and faxed a copy to him at approximately 6:30 P>M> on Friday night. I will attach a copy to each set of plans and move forward to issue permit.

Routing - PLAN CHECK

3/4/1999

3/5/1999

PASS

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Met with Jim Hernandez & John Hughes of AT&T & H&L Architects to review their resubmittals, disciver any deficiencies and to move forward with issuaing a permit. Floyd Varley accepted resubmittals for alarms, detection & sprinklers and I reviewed the plans for doors, fire walls and protection of openings and penetrations with the understanding that even if not complete on resubmittals, I would redline the plans with requirements to be met and Jim Hernandex, AT&T Bulding Engineer would see the items were completed. I have put notes & comments together on plans and am prepared to process for issuance of permit.

PLANS/APPL TAKEN TO FRONT DESK

3/5/1999

PASS

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Routing to permit desk for processing. desk

Meeting

3/4/1999

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Meeting with Floyd Varley, Jim Hernandez (AT&T Building Engineer), John Hughes (Architect w/ H&L)and Dan Stuart. New plans & submittals were brought to the meeting by the architect along with responses to previous plan review comments of 9/30/98, 2/2/99 & 3/4/99 for Fire Dept. & 2/11/99 of Bulding Plans Corrections list. We reviewed each item still open on the proposed Fire Command Center project for which this permit was applied for as well as all outstanding questions having to do with the 1992 agreement letter for required modifications to the facility because of the new office occuapncy located more than 75 feet above grade causing this facility to be reclassified as an exisitng high rise. The sprinkler system, smoke detection, alarms, 1-hour occupancy separation walls with 1-hour protected opening for doors and ducts and penetrations that separates the sprinkled areas from the nonsprinkled telecommunications equipment rooms, pressurization of the center and East stair enclosures and the exit system serving the 6th floor offices (to include rated doors to the enclosures and into the enclosure extension located on the first floor) were reviewed item by item. The resubmitted plans did not indicate if fire dampers were/are present at all ducts penetrating the one-hour occupancy separation walls required under the 1992 agreement. I will make this requirement noted on the plans as well as mark the specific walls as designated on the small set of plans submitted to show locations. The fire & structural inspectors will verify compliance with the 1991 UBC for these areas as agreed. Floyd has verbally accepted information as showing compliance with Fire Code review and will approve plans for permit issuance. I will check the doors presented as to current ratings & proposed upgrades and let H&L Architects know what doors are speciffically part of the 1992 upgrade agreement.

Routing - FIRE

3/4/1999

PASS

Name:
Title:
Phone:

approved as noted on plans provided this date by ATT and Cator Ruma

Plan resubmittals received

3/4/1999

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Received answers to all requests and a verbal agreement from Mr. Hernandez & Mr. Hughes to complete the project per notes & attachments we put on plans to help clarify if we will move forward with issuing the permit. Floyd and I agreed we could work with them based on the new information reveived.

Plan resubmittals requested

2/11/1999

PARK

Name:
Title:
Phone:

PLAN REVIEW COMPLETED WITH FAX AND LETTER TO ARCHITECT SCOTT KEUHN AND AT&T PROJECT MANAGER JIM HERNANDEZ.

Plan Reviewer's activity

2/11/1999

Name:
Title:
Phone:

REVIEWED PLANS WITH FLOYD AND THE INABILITY TO GET COMPLETE PLANS AS REQUESTED AMNY TIMES OVER IN RELATION TO THE 1992 LETTER UPGRADE AGREEMENT WITH AT&T & US WEST AND THE CITY BUILDING & FIRE DEPARTMENTS. THE FIRE COMMAND CENTER IS PART OF THE AGREEMENT AS WELL AS THOSE ITEMS NOTED CONCERNIGN FIRE SEPARATION WALLS, SMOKE DETECTION, ALARMS & SPRINKLER SYSTEM PLANS FOR APPROVAL TO ISSUE A PERMIT. WE CONTINUOUSLY GET ONLY PARTIAL PLANS WITHOUT THE INFORMATION REQUESTED AND ASSURED WE WOULD GET EACH TIME THE PARTIES COMNE TO THE CITY TO SEEK TO GET OUT OF SOME REQUIREMENT OR CONFUSE AN ISSUE BY STATING WE KEEP CHANGING REQUIRMENTS. AFTER WE ONCE AGAIN READ THE AGREEMENT AND CODE APPLICABLE TO SHOW THAT WE HAVE NOT CHANGED BUT THEY HAVE NOT READ THE REQUIREMENTS, THEY LEAVE STATING WE WILL HAVE WHAT IS NEEDED ASAP. THIS HASN'T HAPPENDED YET. NOT

Routing - PLAN CHECK

2/9/1999

2/11/1999

PARK

Name:
Title:
Phone:

I GAVE A SET OF PLANS TO FLOYD TO REVIEW BASED ON A CONVERSATION HE HAD WITH MR. HUGHES WHILE I REVIEWED THE OTHER. THE PLANS DO NOT PROVIDE THE INFORMATION REQYUIRED IN A JANUARY 6, 1999 MEETING WE HELD WITH PROJECT REPS, FLOYD & MYSELF TO TRY AND GET THE FINAL PROCESS UNDERWAY. PLANS ARE PARKED BEHIND MY DESK UNTIL RESUBMITTALS ARE RECEIVED.

Routing - FIRE

2/9/1999

2/10/1999

FAIL

Name:
Title:
Phone:

PLANS BACK TO PLAN REVIEW TO HOLD UNTIL SUBMITTAL REQUIRED ARE SUBMITTED.

Routing - PLAN CHECK

2/2/1999

2/8/1999

Name:
Title:
Phone:

PICKED UP PLANS TO BEGIN REVIEW.

Routing - FIRE

1/27/1999

2/2/1999

FAIL

Name:
Title:
Phone:

alarm plans do not meet the requirements of the 1992 agreement or corrections required of the 9/98 review of the fire alarm system.

Plan assigned to (MYS)

1/26/1999

1/27/1999

Name:	Marlene Southard
Title:	PLAN REVIEW MANAGER
Phone:	384-3822

Marlene Southard

Plan routing begun/TENANTS

1/27/1999

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Route to FIRE and PLAN CHECK.

Application received

1/26/1999

PASS

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Received Certificate of Value

1/26/1999

PASS

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Plans ACCEPTED BY PLAN TECH

1/26/1999

PASS

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Recd Pcfee & Taken To Pln CK

1/26/1999

Name:
Title:
Phone: