| Case Summary (BLD) | | | 9/7/2016 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
| Fee Review-notes | 6/19/2003 | 6/19/2003 | 6/19/2003 | | DONE |
|
|
|
Additional value from subcontractor.
|
| Fee Review-notes | 4/13/1999 | | 9/17/2001 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
| Permanent Occupancy | | 9/5/2001 | 9/5/2001 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
| Permanent occupancy | | | 9/5/2001 | | DONE |
|
|
|
Perm. Occ. Cert. #8811 issued 9-5-01 to Pam Oil, Inc.
|
| FIRE-Final Inspection | 8/30/2001 | 8/30/2001 | 8/30/2001 | P | PASS |
Rick Jackson
|
|
|
Scheduled by a contractor via Hello! on 08/30/2001 at 09:10:33. Contact: ###-####.
|
| BLD-Other | 8/30/2001 | 8/30/2001 | 8/30/2001 | P | PASS |
Jim Storey
|
|
|
Scheduled by a contractor via Hello! on 08/30/2001 at 09:11:18. Contact: ###-####. final ok 8/30/2001 3:51:20 PM
|
| BLD-Aging Inspection | 8/22/2001 | 8/22/2001 | 8/22/2001 | | PASS |
Jim Storey
|
|
|
wip. 8/23/2001 2:07:52 PM
|
| Print Occupancy Form | | | 8/14/2001 | | |
|
|
|
|
| BLD-Framing/Rough-in | 6/21/2001 | 6/22/2001 | 6/22/2001 | A | PART |
Jim Storey
|
|
|
Scheduled by a contractor via Hello! on 06/21/2001 at 15:16:19. Contact: ###-####. c/n must meet ada 18 inches at latch side door to office / ok to cover framing on restrooms. 6/22/2001 9:52:21 AM
|
| Issue PAID IN FULL permit | | | 5/17/2001 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
| Routing - PLAN CHECK | 5/8/2001 | 5/8/2001 | 5/8/2001 | | PASS |
|
|
|
Received final review comments from Jim Call, Fire Protection Engineer and the compliance with the 13 step program submitted in Jan, 2000. Per report hazardous materials have been reduced to be within allowable limits and the "S-1" / "B" occupancy classification is applicable. Fire review comments attached. Approved as noted and attached to approved plans.
|
| PLANS/APPL TAKEN TO FRONT DESK | | | 5/8/2001 | | PASS |
|
|
|
To permit desk to process to issue.
|
| Print Occupancy Form | | | 5/8/2001 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
| Inspection Record Card- Bld | | | 5/8/2001 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
| Telephone call | | | 5/8/2001 | | DONE |
|
|
|
called permit ready
|
| Plan assigned to (DRS) | 3/22/1999 | | 5/8/2001 | | PASS |
Dan Stuart
|
|
|
5/8/2001 10:01:33 DRS - activity updated through activity BLDA022 from case BLD99-00711.
|
| Routing - FIRE | 4/30/2001 | 4/30/2001 | 5/7/2001 | | PASS |
Bill Alexander
|
|
|
|
| Plan resubmittals received | | | 4/30/2001 | | PEND |
|
|
|
RECEIVED FINAL REPORT FROM FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEER DECLARING THE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HAD BEEN REDUCED TO WITHIN ALLOWABLE LIMITS FOR DECLARING THE OCCUPANCY USE AS AN "S-1" INSTEAD OF "H3". forwarded back to fire code analyst for review.
|
| Telephone call | | | 4/17/2001 | | DONE |
|
|
|
Called Jim Calls office to see if he could say when the report of 4/12/01 would be sent out to the city for review. I talked with his answereing service who took the message and said thy would pass it on.
|
| Telephone call | | | 4/17/2001 | | DONE |
|
|
|
Call from Rob Stapley to clarify that the Rivet Rite name was the Style name for the particular unit for the Pam Racks and the manufacture of the rack was Penco. The architectural plans had called for Rivet Rite racks and the engineering provided was for Penco.
|
| Meeting | | | 4/17/2001 | | |
|
|
|
Discussed the progress of the PAM OIL permit and the need for the plan check division to take some to take a positive step and issue the permit for the declared application use as an "S-1" Storage occupancy and then go to the site and review if the allowable quantities of hazardous materials based on the FPE, Jim Call's report were what was on hand and give immediate notice of action to take to meet allowable limits or be shut done or if within allowable limits to move forward with permit remodel to allow issuance of a certificate of occupancy. This has been going on for two years plus at a slow pace and interupts every other project each time new information is provide but not enough to get the permit issued. Fire Dept. plan review is waitng for the reconciliation of the hazardous materials quantiites difference as reported by Jim Call in his 11/27/00 letter declaring they have 4 time s the allowable limits of flammable materials and the Pam Oil inventory of 11/16/00 & 3/6/01 that indicates the quantities to be within allowable limits. Marlene stated I shoudn't issue the racking permit until the T.I can be issued so the tenant does not get the wrong idea concerning the quantities of storage allowed. I will report back to her when I receive the final report from Jim Call. Marlene thought we could issue the permit with the specific note by the fire department on the plans that the allowable quantities could not be exceeded now or in the future the allowable limits based on Tables 3-D & 3-E and this is what would be checked in the field.
|
| Telephone call | | | 4/12/2001 | | DONE |
|
|
|
Call from Pam Oil to say that Mr. Call hwas a the site and wanted to know if a member of the fire department was going to come to review with him. I had been informed they would not and ask that they encourage Mr. Cll to provide his report A.S.A.P. to aid in the issuance of the T.I. permit or allow the city to take other action.
|
| Additional plans submitted | | | 4/9/2001 | | |
|
|
|
Additional racking plans were submitted by Mark Arnold, associate of Rob Stapley, Pam Oil, and remaining copies of engineering. I will begin the racking permit review so that hopefully this permit can be ready to issue at the same time the T.I. permit is ready. Mark reconfirmed that Jim Call would be in on Thursday the 12 of April for his inspection for his final report. He said he would call back with the time. Mark called and said Jim would be their approximately 9 a.m.
|
| Additional plans submitted | | | 3/29/2001 | | |
|
|
|
Robert Stapley, Pam Oil Manager at this site, brought in part of the rack plan structural design / plans for separate rack permit. He will bring in remainder of plans as soon as he receives them from the engineer. He will also fax me a certificate of value for the rack permit. Mr. Stapely has informed me that Mr. Jim Call, Fire Protection Engineer who formulated the original plan for bringing the facility hazardous materials into compliance with the building & fire codes for allowable limits that can be stored or used at the site and be classified as an "S-1" storage occupancy rather than upgrade to an "H" occupancy for stoage of Flammable Liquids exceeding the allowable limits. Mr. Calls report of 11/21/00 indicated the tenant had not achieved the allowable limits to meet "S-1" requirements. The tenant had submitted through the architect on 1/27/00 that the requirements had been met and based on this letter we had released a permit for the adjoining tenant, OEC, to perform work to finish and occupy a part of the original Pam Oil space to be a part of thier tenant space. A copy of the inventory from Rob Stapley, Pam Oil manager also seems to indicate the quantities of haz. mat. are within allowable limits. Mr. Call has been requested to return to the site for a final inspection to determine which report is correct so that we can either issue the permit or take action to returnn the previously submitted plans of Mar 1999 to the architect for redesign as an "H" occupancy for flammable liquids ant to notify the fire department to take a course of action to alleviate the violation and use of the illegal occupancy and the hazardous products until the plans and permits can be issued, work done and approved with a certificate of occupancy issed for said actual use and then the tenant can occupy for the use he appears to desire. Rob will call to notify the time of Mr. Calls arrival so I can notify the fire department in case they would like to attend the inspection.
|
| Routing - PLAN CHECK | 3/22/2001 | 3/22/2001 | 3/23/2001 | | FAIL |
|
|
|
3/22/01 - Received plans and comments back from Sam Rogers. He had reviewed the plans and file with Dave Miller and a note was attached to the plans that a site inspection by the fire department would be scheduled by Dave Miller to evaluate the conditions regarding the occupancy classification of the building - "H3" or "S1". If "H3" the fire department would determine the next action, if "S1" the plans could move forward per the application. Ball is in the Fire departments court. Plans on Hold behind my desk.
|
| Telephone call | | | 3/23/2001 | | DONE |
|
|
|
Call to Ev Davis, 1/208/726/5260, Boeing street warehouse property owner, to ask him concerning the "Letter of Agreement" to have been submitted by and signed Mr.Ev Davis stating the 30 day time frame to provide necessary information - this was in October 2000. Mr. Davis will follow up and provide the letter and see where Cole Assocs. are in the plan submittals. Also to let Mr. Davis know of the Fire Dept. determination to do on site inspection of PAM Oil to determine occupancy compliance or to take actio to remove the situation - to be determined by F.D.
|
| Plan Reviewer's activity | | | 3/22/2001 | | |
|
|
|
Received e-mail notification from Steve Keuter, Fire Dept. that he was serving notice to Beoing Warehouse tenatn s including PAM OIL Co. that he was coming to reinspect the tenants to see if they had obtained permits to make required corrections and work was under way or if they had reveived a certificate of occupancy. If they have not he will serve them with a citation to appear in court.
|
| Routing - PLAN CHECK | 2/16/2001 | 2/16/2001 | 3/21/2001 | | FAIL |
|
|
|
2/9/01 - Call to Jim Call, FPE, to discuss discrepencies between his report on quantities of HM at Pam Oil site, showing them exceeding allowable quantities and they would still be classified as an "H3" occupancy, and the inventory list and letter from Pam Oil, 1/31/00, through their architect stating they were within allowable quantities per Tbl 3-D & E, UBC. The declaration letter had been used by the architect, representing Thornton Oliver Keller to request the release of the OEC Project, with plans on hold, per letter of 9/3/99, until Pam Oil provided required information to have the permit, BLD99-00711 issued.
Talked with Mr. Call's wife. She stated Jim had taken their daughter to an appointment and that she would leave him a message to call me or Sam Rogers, Fire code analyst, to review the discrepencies of hazardous materials reports. Mr. Call has not returned any calls.
2/13/01 - Sam Rogers has e-mailed Mr. Call to ask him to call concerning the hazardous materials reports.
3/6/01 - Received new inventory statement from Pam Oil through Matt Rhees.
On 3/16/01 a fax from Mr. Joel Fasnacht, PAM Co. indicated that Mr. Call had been notified we were trying to get in contact with him. I had requested Mr. Fasnacht to help contact Mr. Call, several days ago.
3/21/01 - Had discussion with Sam Rogers concerning failure to get response from Jim Call on his engineering report and the need to either issue the permit as the "S1" occupancy as noted in the application for permit and then have the fire dept. verify compliance with code requirementsand give the written corrections required to the tenant and action dates for compliance or vacation of tenant space or not issue the permit and send the Fire Department back to the site to give them the final citation to appear in court for Pam Oils failure to comply with Notice of Violation issued in 1/17/97 to Marion Hoffman and reviewed with Marlene Southard, Boise City Plan Check Div.for plan submittal requirements; the several years of correspondence with several different individuals and not achieving a final product for which a building permit can be issued, to date; and the Notification of 11/19/00, Pre-Citation Letter of 11/21/00 with a final reinspection date of 1/9/01 set to evaluate the need for issuance of a citation to require the tenant appear in court.
Mr. Rogers will review the file and review with his supervisor, Dave Miller for actions to be taken.
3/21/01 - Plans and updated comments based on the application submitted for a permit in 1999 to Sam Rogers for comment. To much time is being spent on this project without obtaining a final course of action - this needs to be resolved now.
|
| Additional plans submitted | | | 3/21/2001 | | |
|
|
|
Updated permit and plans with information received and copies of 13 point plan from Jim Call, FPE (11/27/00), latest inventory sheets from PAM Oil (3/6/01), and letter from Joel Fasnacht, PAM Co (10/31/00). Transfered notes to be same on both sets of plans & gave back to Sam Rogers to determine if the fire department will approve for issuance of permit based on letter to have occupancy use in compliance with code 30 days from the date of issuance and the latest hazardous materials inventory from PAM Oil produced by Rob Stapley and routed to our office through architect Matt Rhees, Cole | Assoc. Field inspection will need to determine if the FPE report is correct or the inventory provided to comply with HazMat quantities allowed in the proposed "S1/B" occupancy use change.
|
| Telephone call | | | 3/16/2001 | | DONE |
|
|
|
Received copy of e-mail sent to Jim Call, Fire Protection Engineer, from Joel Fasnacht, PAM Companies, noting that I had tried to call him and giving him my phone number and asking him to call me.
|
| Routing - PLAN CHECK | 11/27/2000 | 2/10/2001 | 2/10/2001 | | FAIL |
|
|
|
Plans being forwarded to fire code analysts to determine actual quantities of hazardous materials at site and the actions to be jointly taken by the fire & building departments to resolve the situation of illegal occupancy and life/safety violations based on the hazardous materials.
|
| Plan resubmittals received | | | 11/27/2000 | | FAIL |
|
|
|
|
| Plan resubmittals received | | | 11/27/2000 | | DONE |
|
|
|
Received two copies of revised sheets A0.0, A0.1, A1.0, A2.0, A3.0, two copies of structural eng. rack storage calculations. Two copies fire protection eng. report. One copy of Pam Oil inventory list. Routed to Dan S. KMM
|
| Routing - FIRE | 2/10/2001 | | 2/16/2000 | | FAIL |
|
|
|
HM inventory from FPE Jim Call Nov. 2000 still shows some H3 quantities in building. Two separate submittals received directly from Pam Oil Nov and Feb. 2000 indicate quantities below H3 amounts. Plans submitted are for S1 quantities. Need to verify which inventory is correct to establish Occupancy group before plans can be approved.
Called Jim Call requesting him to contact us to help explain why the discrepancies in the inventory reports. 2/21/01-No response to two follow-up calls to Jim Call. Returned plans to Dan Stuart for follow-up with architect to enlist his help to resove the discrepancies.
3/22/01-Architect has had no response from Jim Call. Contacted Dave Miller, FD requested a site visit by FD HM specialist and FD Code enforcement to see what is actually there. I suggested to the FD that if quantities are over exempt amts that the FD give them 5-days to remove the excess HM's (above exempt amounts) to a satisfactory location or close down their occupancy. This is because the initial occupancy was done illegally without a CO and in 3/99 the FD cited them and granted approval to allow continued occupancy only on the basis of them getting a permit and completing the work necessary to bring the spaceinto to code conformance. Two years is more than ample time to have gotten this completed, but we're still at the stage fo identifying the inventory/occupancy. The lack of response to the discrepancies over the past two months indicates lack of commitment by the tenant to get this resolved. D. Miller will follow up with his staff to do the site visit and advise us of the results.
|
| Additional plans submitted | | | 1/31/2000 | | DONE |
|
|
|
1/31/2000 ADDITIONAL PLANS NOT RECEIVED, INSTEAD RECEIVED LETTER FROM PAM OIL STATING THAT THEY HAVE PERMANENTLY REMOVED HAZARDOUS AMOUNTS OF MATERIAL SO THAT THEY WILL BE CLASSIFIED AS AN S-1 OCCUPANCY. ROUTED TO DAN S. KMM
|
| Plan Reviewer's activity | | | 6/15/1999 | | |
|
|
|
Plans submitted for review did not contain an architects analysis of the current tenant use, All that has been provided is a floor plan calling the area a warehouse with no mention of quantities or types of chemicals; methods or location of storage, history of building, etc. The architect has classified the structure as a Type VN construction and warehouse - over area for the type of construction and no attempt to review tenant use sufficiently to provide an occupancy use group as designated by code. The tenant space also has a mezzanine with stir access and no use was declared for this area. There is no consideration of exiting requirements based on proposed new wall construction and lack of access to exterior and required separation of exits; ventilation was not considered or accessibility. Plans were not dimensioned nor were room uses specifically called out. Proposes remodel creates three spaces out of one.
|
| Routing - PLAN CHECK | 6/14/1999 | | 6/15/1999 | | HOLD |
|
|
|
Received report fro Floyd thru Marlene Southard and Bill alexander that the quantities & classification of hazardous material located at the tenant site, based on data submitted by architect, exceed the allowable quantities and the occupancy group would be an "H-3". This requires a new code analysis of the tenant site for fire walls; sprinkler system evaluation & possible upgrade; alarm system analysis; methods of storage / separation & protection of chemical liquids; ventilation; exiting; door hardware; room dimensions & uses specifically noted on plans; possible assistance of an expert in the field of flammable & combustible liquids to help in the design requirements for the tenant, etc. as regulated in the fire & building codes. The plans as originally presented are rejected and the architect has been notified by fax & by mail with a copy of the notification faxed to the property owners.
|
| Telephone Call | | | 6/2/1999 | | |
|
|
|
Call from Matt Rhees to check on progress of Pam Oil tenant improvement. I told Mat that I had heard from Marlene that Floyd had classified the building as an "H-3 Occupancy and would review the plans submitted to see if they had sufficient information based on the architects code analysis. I told Matt that he would need to review the requirements for this occupancy group and show how the tenant space / occupant would bring the use into code compliance. If plans do not contain sufficient information the would be rejected and the review prosess stopped until new information is provided. I will alert Matt as soon as I receive the official report and it is time to review his project again after finishing the project I am doing.
|
| Routing - FIRE | 5/26/1999 | | 6/1/1999 | | FAIL |
|
|
|
FED EXED FLOYD A COPY OF THE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS LIST. KMM BUILDING OCCUPANCY IS AN H3 DUE TO THE AMMOUNTS OF FLAMMABLE AND COMBUSTABLE LIQUIDS STORED. NOW REQUIRES BUILDING SEPERATION, FIRE SPRINKLER RE-EVALUATIONS, ETC. COPY OF REVIEW FORWARDED TO THE FIRE MARSHAL.
|
| Routing - PLAN CHECK | 3/24/1999 | | 4/20/1999 | | HOLD |
|
|
|
Picked up plans to begin review. Found that the architect had not responded to fire code review comments providing a list of chemicals & quantities thereof for analysis to see if tenant space was to be classified as an "H" occupancy. Notified Matt Rhees that this had not been done and faxed copy of fire code report done by Floyd Varley. Copy had been faxed on 3/24/99 originally. Until data is received and determination made of occupancy classification it cannot be determined what additional information or design data is required.
|
| Routing - FIRE | 3/22/1999 | | 3/24/1999 | | FAIL |
|
|
|
need storage info
|
| Plan routing begun/TENANTS | | | 3/22/1999 | | |
|
|
|
Route to FIRE and PLAN CHECK.
|
| Plans ACCEPTED BY PLAN TECH | | | 3/18/1999 | | PASS |
|
|
|
|
| Received Certificate of Value | | | 3/17/1999 | | PASS |
|
|
|
|
| Application received | | | 3/17/1999 | | |
|
|
|
|
| Recd Pcfee & Taken To Pln CK | | | 3/17/1999 | | |
|
|
|
|
| Plan Review Report | | | | | |
|
|
|
|