Case Summary (BLD) | | | 1/12/2016 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Case Summary (BLD) | | | 6/11/2001 | | |
|
|
|
|
BLD-Final | 10/20/1999 | 10/21/1999 | 10/21/1999 | A | PASS |
Jim Storey
|
|
|
Fiberglass Systems - this is the one we talked about - Cathy
|
Letter of compliance | | | 10/20/1999 | | DONE |
|
|
|
Letter of Compliance #17935 issued 10-20-99.
|
Fee Review-notes | 5/12/1999 | | 10/20/1999 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
BLD-Final | 10/11/1999 | 10/12/1999 | 10/12/1999 | A | PART |
Jim Storey
|
|
|
pending elec sign off
|
BLD-Final | 10/8/1999 | 10/11/1999 | 10/11/1999 | A | FAIL |
Jim Storey
|
|
|
HARRY--- ###-#### FN OCC pending ele sign off
|
FIRE-Final Inspection | 10/7/1999 | 10/8/1999 | 10/8/1999 | A | PASS |
Rick Jackson
|
|
|
OCC APPROVEDarry ###-#### fn fire
|
BLD-Final | 10/7/1999 | 10/8/1999 | 10/8/1999 | P | CANC |
|
|
|
larry-- ###-#### fn occ---CANCEL PER HARRY
|
FIRE-Final Inspection | 10/6/1999 | 10/7/1999 | 10/7/1999 | A | FAIL |
Rick Jackson
|
|
|
###-#### exit light at main exit
|
Issue PAID IN FULL permit | | | 7/30/1999 | | |
|
|
|
|
Plan resubmittals received | | | 7/23/1999 | | PEND |
|
|
|
RECEIVED PLAN RESUBMITTALS FROM MATT RHEES, COLE ARCHITECTS, FORWARDED SAME TO DAN STUART. DAR 7/23/99
|
Print Occupancy Form | | | 7/20/1999 | | |
|
|
|
|
Inspection Record Card- Bld | | | 7/20/1999 | | |
|
|
|
|
Inspection Record Card- Bld | | | 7/20/1999 | | |
|
|
|
|
Telephone call | | | 7/20/1999 | | |
|
|
|
called Matt Rhees at ###-#### to notify that permit was ready
|
Routing - PLAN CHECK | 7/15/1999 | | 7/19/1999 | | PASS |
|
|
|
Approved as noted and attached based on limited scope of work defined by architect, Matt Rhees.
|
Print Pending Permit.LaserJet4 | | | 7/19/1999 | | PASS |
|
|
|
Plan approved as noted and attached based on scope of work as defined by architect on sheet A0.0 under project data. Permit for Accessibility upgrade, new required exit door & exit signs & illumination. Other outstanding items as noted on MIS99-0094 still pending.
|
PLANS/APPL TAKEN TO FRONT DESK | | | 7/19/1999 | | PASS |
|
|
|
Approved as noted and stated scope of work on plans. To permit desk for issuance.
|
Plan assigned to (DRS) | 5/13/1999 | | 7/19/1999 | | PASS |
Dan Stuart
|
|
|
07/19/99 14:50:23 DRS - this action updated by action script from <<>> in Case No. BLD99-1370
|
Routing - FIRE | 7/13/1999 | | 7/15/1999 | | PASS |
|
|
|
|
Plan resubmittals received | | | 7/14/1999 | | |
|
|
|
Per follow-up review for architects response to original plan review comments of 6/25/99, by Jason Blais, while Dan Stuart was out of office for a week. Ther are still outstanding items requiring addressing by architect concerning ventilation & high-pile storage installation of racks, sprinklers & alarm system per MIS99-0094, issued to allow temporary occupancy by Fiberglass Systems, Inc.
|
Plan resubmittals requested | | | 7/13/1999 | | |
|
|
|
Jason reviewed resubmittals from Cole Assoc. & requested additional information be submitted as required in the 6/25/99 plan review by Dan Stuart.
|
Routing - PLAN CHECK | 6/17/1999 | | 7/13/1999 | | FAIL |
|
|
|
Still some issues not fully addressed from plan review report. Letter sent requesting more clarification. Plans routed to fire again.
|
Plan resubmittals received | | | 6/25/1999 | | |
|
|
|
RECEIVED TWO COPIES OF REVISED PLANS AND ROUTED TO DAN S. KMM
|
Routing - FIRE | 6/14/1999 | | 6/16/1999 | | FAIL |
|
|
|
NEED INFORMATION AS TO EXITING THROUGH WORK AREAS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING AND HVAC.
|
Plan resubmittals requested | | | 6/11/1999 | | HOLD |
|
|
|
corrections required, faxed and mailed review comments to architects Stan Cole & Matt Rhees.
|
Routing - PLAN CHECK | 6/9/1999 | | 6/11/1999 | | |
|
|
|
Plans incomplete. Additional information required. Faxed and mailed copy of plan review comments to architect. Forwarding plans to Fire Dept.
|
Waiting for Cert. of Value | | | 6/11/1999 | | |
|
|
|
Certificate of Value presented did not reflect correct values.
|
Meeting | | | 6/11/1999 | | |
|
|
|
Met with Rory Hammersmark, contractor for this project when permit is issued. He had been directed by the new owners, Thornton-Oliver-Keller, to remove the floor in one of the restrooms and cut in a new door prior to application for a permit. Approximate cost of restroom one is 1900.00
|
Print Pending Permit.LaserJet4 | | | 6/11/1999 | | HOLD |
|
|
|
|
Plans ACCEPTED BY PLAN TECH | | | 5/14/1999 | | PEND |
|
|
|
PERMIT APPLIED FOR INCLUDED T.I PLUS RACKING. RACKING AND T.I. MUST BE DONE SEPARATELY. THERE IS NO REFERENCE MADE ON THE PLANS ABOUT RACKING FLOOR LAY OUT. ENG. HAS NOT BEEN SUPPLIED AND THE FIRE SYSTEM IS NOT ADDRESSED FOR THE HIGH PILE STORAGE. I HAVE ROUTED THE PLANS TO DAN STUART WHO WILL CALL MATT RHEES ABOUT THESE ISSUES. KMM
|
Plan assigned to (MYS) | 5/12/1999 | | 5/13/1999 | | |
Marlene Southard
|
|
|
|
Received Certificate of Value | | | 5/13/1999 | | PEND |
|
|
|
|
Application received | | | 5/12/1999 | | |
|
|
|
|
Recd Pcfee & Taken To Pln CK | | | 5/12/1999 | | |
|
|
|
|
Meeting | | | 5/10/1999 | | |
|
|
|
Met with Matt Rhees to review proposed project. Plans were not dimensioned and no code analysis of existing building / tenant past history had been done. No C.O. on file for this tenant space since 1981 permit for warehouse of 63,000 sq. ft. with fire walls & fully sprinkled. Plans indicated 20 foot high steel racks for storage and a fabrication / accessorizing area for installing grab bars, soap dishes and the like to pre-manufactured fiberglass tubs constructed at the 4545 Enterprise Fiberglass Systems site. This is viewed as a change in occupancy and requires that all activity for this tenant be reviewed and plans presented under the 1997 UBC. The high steel racks require design engineering as outlined in Sec 2222, Div. X, 1997 UBC Vol. II and a separate plan and application as directed by Marlene Southard. There are concerns about exiting, accessibility and interior environement, compliance with fire code & sprinkler system requirements for existing (has system been kept current) and the proposed high piled storage. Plan indicated the new exit door and one rest room upgrade. Other items of concern were not addressed on the plans. The plans were rejected and Matt left to correct data. There was considerable discussion on the need to dimension plans and finally Matt asked to talk to Marlene Southard, my superviser. She concurred with the need to have plans fully dimensioned for the area / tenant space work and especially now when everything gets micro fiched and we cannot scale them for future reference. Having to scale plans also leads to mistakes in review and in construction if a scale is misread or the drawing incorrect.
|