Boise PDS Online - BLD99-02218

Information based on query as of Thursday, July 18, 2024.

Permit Information

Permit Number	BLD99-02218
Status	Finaled
Name	PANDA EXPRESS
Site Address	350 N MILWAUKEE ST Unit: 2014
Project Name	BTS - #2014
Customer Number
ePlanReview	No
Description	To remodel an 800 sq.ft. food prep/take out space in the food court area, upper level, Boise Towne Square Mall, per approved plans on file. Work to include construction of interior non-bearing, non-combustible walls within the tenant space; installation of a rolling grille assembly between the mall & tenant; installation of a grease hood system & rated shaft; interior modifications to millwork, equipment, finishes, electrical, mechanical, plumbing, sprinkler & smoke control systems as required for code compliance. NOTE: New 1-hour exit corridor that forms a portion of this tenat space wall at the Northeast side is permitted and being constructed under BLD99-0670, Food Court Expansion & Remodel. NOTE: This building is fully fire sprinklered and has a smoke control system. (P.C.#553-99)/drs

Contact Information

See Activities list for contact information

Permit Details Project Related Cases Activities Conditions Parcel Fees Valuation Documents Permit Summary Report

Show Inspection Activities Only

Description

Received

Requested

Completed

AM/PM

Disposition

Assigned To

Receive PAYMENT IN FULL

1/26/2000

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Telephone call

1/14/2000

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

DAVID FROM PANDA CALLED WANTING TO KNOW ABOUT BILL..I EXPLANED TO HIM ABOUT THE FEES. LH

Permanent Occupancy

1/7/2000

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Permanent occupancy UNPAID FEE

1/7/2000

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Perm. Occ. Cert. #8074 issued 1-7-00 to the Panda Express at Boise Towne Square.

Fee Review-notes

7/22/1999

12/22/1999

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

BLD-Final

12/15/1999

12/17/1999

PASS

Name:	Carl Dependahl
Title:	BLD-COM/RES INSPECTOR
Phone:	794-9492

Carl Dependahl

Card to cont.

Temporary occupancy

12/17/1999

PART

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Temp. Occ. Cert. #3960 issued 12-17-99 to the Panda Express.

FIRE-Final Inspection

12/15/1999

12/16/1999

PASS

Name:	Joe Tawney
Title:	FIRE INSPECTOR
Phone:	340-1295

Joe Tawney

Reinsp. Ok for permanent occ.

FIRE-Final Inspection

12/14/1999

12/15/1999

FAIL

Name:	Joe Tawney
Title:	FIRE INSPECTOR
Phone:	340-1295

Joe Tawney

###-#### Reinsp. Fail cooking hood test.

BLD-Final

12/14/1999

12/15/1999

FAIL

Name:	Carl Dependahl
Title:	BLD-COM/RES INSPECTOR
Phone:	794-9492

Carl Dependahl

###-#### N/R, fire C/N.. Recall.

FIRE-Final Inspection

12/13/1999

12/14/1999

FAIL

Name:	Joe Tawney
Title:	FIRE INSPECTOR
Phone:	340-1295

Joe Tawney

fire inspection Panda Express Final fail C/N issued.

FIRE-Sprinkler Rough-in

12/10/1999

12/13/1999

PART

Name:	Joe Tawney
Title:	FIRE INSPECTOR
Phone:	340-1295

Joe Tawney

Scheduled by a contractor via Hello! on 12/10/1999 at 12:16:00. Contact: ###-####. Ok on sprkl. R/I.

BLD-Framing/Rough-in

12/8/1999

12/9/1999

PART

Name:	Carl Dependahl
Title:	BLD-COM/RES INSPECTOR
Phone:	794-9492

Carl Dependahl

bill ###-#### Shaft.

BLD-Framing/Rough-in

12/2/1999

PART

Name:	Tom Arcoraci
Title:	BLD-COM/RES INSPECTOR
Phone:	794-9368

Tom Arcoraci

Billy ###-#### Ok to cover.

BLD-Framing/Rough-in

11/22/1999

11/23/1999

PART

Name:	Carl Dependahl
Title:	BLD-COM/RES INSPECTOR
Phone:	794-9492

Carl Dependahl

billy ###-#### Ok to cover int. walls only.

Issue PAID IN FULL permit

11/18/1999

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Inspection Record Card- Bld

11/17/1999

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Print Occupancy Form

11/17/1999

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Telephone call

11/17/1999

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Mary Ann ###-####

Routing - PLAN CHECK

9/23/1999

11/16/1999

PASS

Name:
Title:
Phone:

RECEIVED FINAL RESUBMITTALS & ENGINEERING FOR PROJECT PER PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. INSERTED ALL COPIES INTO THREE SETS OF PLANS & MADE SURE ALL RED-LINE NOTES WERE THE SAME ON ALL COPIES. ROUTING TO PERMIT DESK FOR ISSUANCE OF PERMIT.

Plan resubmittals received

11/16/1999

PEND

Name:
Title:
Phone:

RECEIVED PLAN RESUBMITTALS FROM H.C. KLOVER ARCHITECTS. FORWARDED SAME TO DAN STUART. 11/16/99 DAR

Case Summary (BLD)

11/16/1999

PASS

Name:
Title:
Phone:

PLANS/APPL TAKEN TO FRONT DESK

11/16/1999

PASS

Name:
Title:
Phone:

PLANS APPROVED AS NOTED AND ATTACHED. ROUTING FOR ISSUANCE OF PERMIT.

Plan assigned to (R_H)

7/28/1999

11/16/1999

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Reassigned to Dan Stuart. ALL SUBMITTALS PROVIDED AND INSERTED INTO PLANS. APPROVED AS NOTED AND ATTACHED.

Plan assigned to (DRS)

8/25/1999

11/16/1999

PASS

Name:	Dan Stuart
Title:	PLAN REVIEWER II
Phone:	395-7873

Dan Stuart

11/16/1999 18:41:09 DRS - activity updated through activity BLDA022 from case BLD99-02218.

Additional plans submitted

11/9/1999

Name:
Title:
Phone:

RECEIVED FAX FROM MARCIA BOLTON SHOWING WELDING CALL-OUT FOR STRUCTURAL ATTACHMENT AT HEADER, HOOD ATTACHMENT CLIP TO WALL & JOIST REINFORCEMENT FOR LOADS AT EXISTING JOISTS BY HOOD.

Telephone call

11/9/1999

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

CALLED MARCIA BOLTON, STRUCTURAL ENGINEER TO LET HER KNOW I HAD RECEIVED FAXED REVISED WELDING AND CONNECTION DETAILS FOR HOOD SUPPORT & JOIST REINFORCEMENT BUT HAD NOT RECEIVED MEANS OF ATTACHMENT FOR ROOF OPENING SUPPORT ANGLE ATTACHMENT METHODS FOR SHEET 21 OF 21 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTALS. I ALSO TOLD HER I HAD FAXED PAUL VASSOS A SPECIAL INSPECTION FORM FOR COMPLETION CONCERNING THE WELDING PER CHAPTER 17 AND THAT SHEE WOULD NEED TO REVIEW THE SECTION AND SPECIFY THE SPECIAL INSPECTION REQUIRMENTS.

Telephone call

11/9/1999

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

CALLED PAUL VASSOS TO VERIFY HE HAD RECEIVED THE FAXED COMMENTS AND TO INFORM HIM OF MY DISCUSSION WITH MARCIA BOLTON ON STRUCTURAL DETAIL NEEDED AND THE SPECIAL INSPECTION CALLOUTS. I TOLD PAULE I WOULD ACCEPT 8-1/2" X 11" DETAILS FOR DETAILS 4 ON SHEETS A2.0, A3.0 & G1.0 AND E/3.0. ALSO 2/A3.1. I WOULD NEED A NEW SHEET A3.2 SINCE ALL DETAILS INVOLVED WELDING CLARIFICATIONS AND SHOULD HAVE STRUCTURAL ENGINEERINGS SPECIAL INSPECTION CALLOUTS PER CODE SECTION 106.3.5 & 1701.5, #5.
PAUL SAID HE WAS WORKING ON INFORMATION AS WE SPEAK.

Plan resubmittals requested

11/9/1999

FAIL

Name:
Title:
Phone:

REVIEW OF PLAN SUBMITTALS & ENGINEERING DETAILS INDICATED DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE TWO DESIGN DOCUMENTS - ARCHITECTS DETAILS DO NOT REFLECT THE ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS. NEW SHEET SUBMITTAL A3.2 RECEIVED DOES NOT DESIGNATE THE WELDING REQUIREMENTS AND SINCE STRUCTURAL WELDING IS REQUIRED FOR SUPPORT OF NEW HOOD UNIT; AT HEADER AT 20 FT. OPENING & GRILL T.S.; AT NEW OPENING & SUPPORT FOR ROOF TOP PENETRATIONS FOR NEW MECH, UNITS, SPECIAL INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS ARE TO BE ESTABLISHED BY THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER AND THE OWNER TO DESIGNATE A SPECIAL INSPECTION AGENCY, COMPLETING SPECIAL INSPECTION FORMS I PROVIDED AS PART OF THE REQUEST FOR RESUBMITTALS. THE SPECIFICATIONS PROVIDED FOR THE WALK-IN COOLER INDICATE THE USE OF WOOD WITHIN THE ASSEMBLY AND PROVIDE A LOS ANGELES LISTING FOR THE PANEL. THE LISTING IS NOT AN ACCEPTABLE SOURCE OF CERTIFICATION UNDER ICBO. THE L.A. CERTIFICATION STATES THE ASSEMBLY IS NOT APPROVED FOR USE IN NON-COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION WHICH THE MALL IS.
ALL OF THESE MATTERS WERE ITEMS COVERED IN THE BROAD SCOPE OF THE ORIGINAL AUGUST 30 PLAN REVIEW; THE OCTOBER 16 REQUEST FOR FURTHER CLARIFICATION BASED ON NOT RECEIVING A RESPONSE TO REQUESTED INFORMATION OR ONLY A PARTIAL RESPONSE. THE MOST RECENT RESUBMITTALS PROVIDE REQUESTED DATA EXCEPT THAT THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD DID NOT REVIEW RE-SUBMITTALS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SPECIFIC CODE SECTION FOR WELDING & SPECIAL INSPECTION OF CHAPTER 17 AND THE USE OF FOAM PLASTICS PER CH. 26 & TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION OF CH. 6. FAXING & MAILING REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION AND FURTHER DETAILING - THAT THE ARCHITECT REVIEW THE 8-1/2" X 11" ENGINEERING DETAILS AND MAKE SURE THEY ARE CORRECTLY AND COMPLETLY SHOWN ON HIS ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION. I CONVEYED MY QUESTION BY PHONE TO PAUL VASSOS THE ARCHITECT AND HE WOULD HAVE THE STRUCTURAL DESIGN ENGINEER, MARCIA BOLTON OF Kerr Conrad Graham Associates. CALL ME DIRECT CONCERNING ENGINEERING DATA.

Telephone call

11/8/1999

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

I CALLED PAUL VASSOS OF H.C. KLOVER ARCHITECTS, TO REVIEW CONTINUED DISCREPENCIES BETWEEN THE ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS & THE ENGINEERING SPECIFICATIONS; THE STORE FRONT SUPPORT AT THE BULKHEAD AND METHOD OF SUPPORT TO STRUCTRE, CLEARANCE BETWEEN SOFFIT & BULKHEAD REQUIRED BY J.P. REALTY, AND LETTER FROM DEBBIE DUFFIELD REPRESENTING JP REALTY STATING THE STORE SOFFIT CA EXTEND OUT UNDER BULKHEAD AS PROPOSED; THE LACK OF WELDING SPECIFICATIONS ON NEW SHEET A3.2 & ENGINEERING; THE CALL OUT FOR THE ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER TO BE CARRIED BY THE FLOOR PER THE OCTOBER 5 RESPONSE LETTER BUT THE DETAIL 4/E3.0 STILL SHOWS THE UNIT SUPPORTED IN THE PLENUM BY THE EXISTING STEEL JOISTS - ENGINEERING WAS NOT PROVIDE FOR VERIFICATION OF ADDITIONAL LOAD; NEED FOR APPROVED FOAM PLASTIC FOR FLAME AND SMOKE DEVELOPMENT PER CH. 26 AND REMOVING WOOD FROM COOLER PANELS SINCE CONSTRUCTION HAS TO BE NON-COMBUSTIBLE FOR TYPE OF BUILDING, II-N, FOR MALL. WILL FAX & MAIL WRITTEN REQUEST TO ARCHITECT. PAUL WILL HAVE ENGINEER MARCIA BOLTON CALL ME TO DISCUSS ENGINEERING DOCUMENT CONCERNS.

Telephone call

11/8/1999

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

RECEIVED CALL FROM MARCIA BOLTON, STRUCTURAL ENGINEER FOR PROJECT. REVIEWED THE LAYOUT OF SUBMITTALS AND THE FACT THAT SEVERAL OF THE ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS INDICAT AND OVERSTRESS OF STRUCTURE AND THAT SUGGESTED METHODS OF ADJUSTMENT WERE PRESENTED BUT NOTHING INDICATED WHICH DESIGN METHOD WAS ACCEPTED AND WHAT MODIFICATION HAD TO BE MADE ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS TO INDICATE THESE CHANGES. THE PLANS ALSO INDICATED SEVERAL LOCATIONS FOR WELDING WITHOUT SPECIFYING THE SIZE AND ONE DETAIL INDICATED ANGLE REINFORCEMENT AT ROOF STRUCTURE OPENING BUT DID NOT INDICATE METHOD OF ATTACHMENT (WELDING OR BOLTING) AND YPE, SIXE HOW MANY OR MUCH FOR METHOD TO BE PROPOSED. MARCIA INDICATED SHE WOULD CORRECT HER DRAWINGS AND RESEND THEM THRU THE ARCHITECT.

Plan resubmittals received

11/5/1999

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

RECEIVED THREE COPIES OF REVISED SHEETS T1.0, A1.0, A2.0, A3.0, A3.2, G1.0, ONE COPY OF RESPONSE LETTER, ONE COPY OF CALCS., ONE COPY OF DOOR SCHEDULE. ROUTED TO DAN. KMM

Plan resubmittals received

10/7/1999

PEND

Name:
Title:
Phone:

RECEIVED PLAN RESUBMITTALS FROM EXPRESS PERMITS, FORWARDED SAME TO DAN STUART. 10/7/99 DAR

Plan resubmittals requested

10/6/1999

FAIL

Name:
Title:
Phone:

PLANS SUBMITTED ON 9/27 WERE INCOMPLETE. WRONG DOOR HARDWARE WAS AGAIN SPECIFIED BY ARCHITECT AND THE STRUCTURAL CONCERNS HAD NOT BEEN ADDRESSED. I EXPRESSED THIS INFORMATION TO CAROL AT EXPRESS PERMITS WHEN SHE CALLED ON 9/30/99. THE RESUBMITTALS HAD CONTAINED A LETTER ASKING FOR ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT.

Plan resubmittals requested

10/6/1999

Name:
Title:
Phone:

CALLED CLINT AT KLOVER ARCHITECTS. I REVIEWED THE DOOR HARDWARE PROBLEM WITH HIM AND SUGGESTED HE MIGHT USE THE SCHLAGE S200 SERIES INTERACTING HARDWARE IF A DEADBOLT WAS REQUIRED AS ONE ACTION ON THE LEVER HARDWARE FROM THE INTERIOR WOULD OPEN THE DOOR BY RELEASING THE DEADBOLT AND THE LATCH AT THE SAME TIME AS WELL AS LEAVE THE KEY LOCK ON THE EXTERIOR.
THE ENGINEERING FOR THE COIL DOOR SYSTEM SHOWED 4" X 4" TUBE STEEL INSTEAD OF THE 3"X3" AND THE BEARING PLATE SPECIFIED IS LESS THAN THE MINIMUM MALL REQUIREMENTS OF 5" X 5" X 1/2" SPECIFIED IN ORIGINAL MALL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS. THE ENGINEERING FOR THE HEADER AND WALL DETAILS APPEARS TO BE THAT PRESENTED BY THE AMLL FOR THE FOOD COURT REMODEL OF THE 1-HOUR BULDKEADS EXCEPT THE BOC BEAM HEADER SIZE WAS INCREASED. I ASK THAT IT BE CLARIFIED IF THE ORIGINAL BULKHEAD WAS TO BE SIZED BIGGER OF IF THIS WAS A MISTAKE. I ALSO ASK THEM TO CLARIFY ON DETAILS 4/A3 FOR THE SOFFIT WALL ATTACHMENT TO THE EXISTING BULKHEAD FOR THE HORIZONTAL MEMBER AND FOR THE VERTICLE TO THE STRUCTURE ABOVE., IF THIS WAS ALLOWED BY MALL. I ALSO REFERED HIM TO DETAIL 1/A3.1 FOR ENGINEERING CLARIFICATION FOR SUPPORT OF THE WALL & SIGN SYSTEM SPANING THE 20 FOOT GRILL OPENING (HOW TO BE SUPPORTED ACROSS AND DOWN) AND DETAIL 2/A3.1 FOR THE PROPER WALL WIDTH AND THE 4" TUBE STEEL IF THIS WAS ACTUALLY WHAT WAS INTENDED BY THE ENGINEER. I ALSO TOLD HIM THAT ARCHITECTURAL & MECHANICAL DRAWINGS REFERED TO EACH OTHER FOR DETAILS ON HOOD SUPPORT; SHAFT CONSTRUCTION & SUPPORT; DETAILS FOR SLOPE OF SHAFT IF ANY, AND CLEANOUTS IF SLOPED, ETC. AS PER THE UMC. I TOLD THE ARCHITECT TO CALL IF HE HAD QUESTIONS AND THAT THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER COULD ALSO CALL SO WE COULD RESOLVE THE PLANS AND GET THE PERMIT ISSUED.

Plan resubmittals received

10/5/1999

FAIL

Name:
Title:
Phone:

MEGAN KORICA, EXPRESS PERMITS, FAXED A COPY OF ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS AND INFORMATION ON THE ROLLING GRILL FOR REVIEW. I CALLED MEGAN AND TOLD HER THE FAX ENGINEERING WAS UNCLEAR AND ASK IF SHE WOULD MAIL A COPY OF THE ORIGINAL MATERIAL. I COULD STILL SEE THERE WERE UNANSWERED OR INCORRECTLY ANSWERED SUBMITTALS AND TOLD HER I WOULD LIKE TO TALK TO THE ARCHITECT DIRECTLY. SHE GAVE ME HIS NUMBER.

Plan resubmittals received

9/28/1999

PEND

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Received plan resubmittals from express permits, forwarded same to Dan Stuart. 9/28/99 DAR

Routing - FIRE

9/22/1999

9/23/1999

PASS

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Telephone call

9/22/1999

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Called Margo of Express Permits to let her know that only the Fire Code review questions have been responded to. The cover letter with response suggested that a permit be issued after review of fire code response submittals. I informed Margo that all plan review comments required a satisfactory response. Plans will be routed to Fire Code analysis for re-review.

Plan resubmittals received

9/21/1999

PEND

Name:
Title:
Phone:

RECEIVED PLAN RESUBMITTALS FROM H.C.KLOVER ARCHITECTS, FORWARDED SAME TO DAN STUART. 9/21/99 DAR
9/22/99 - Reviewed plan resubmittals received 9/21/99 - Plans are for response to Fire Dept. Plan review only. No response to Building Dept. Plan review. Inserted re-submittals into plans and will route back to Fire Code Review.

Plan Review Completed(1st rev)

9/1/1999

FAIL

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Routing - FIRE

8/31/1999

9/1/1999

FAIL

Name:
Title:
Phone:

DETAIL TYPE 1 HOOD SYSTEM MEETING UMC 608 NEEDED. PROVIDE DETECTION FOR MALL SMOKE EVACUATION SYSTEM.

Plan resubmittals requested

8/30/1999

PENS

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Faxed & mailed copy of required re-submittals necessary for continuation of plan review and before a permit can be issued.

Telephone call

8/30/1999

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Call to Margo @ Express Permits to let her know the prelim plan review was completed and copy to Barbara & HC Klover. Routing to Fire Review.

Routing - PLAN CHECK

8/27/1999

8/30/1999

PEND

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Routing to Fire code Analysis for review. Preliminary review donw. Corrections faxed & mailed to architect, H.C. Lover & Barbara, Express Permits.

Print Pending Permit.LaserJet4

8/30/1999

PEND

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Telephone call

8/27/1999

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Call from Margo of Express permit to check on plan review progress. Same Company has called Marlene three times and talked to me through Dave Radfors on the 26th.

Routing - PLAN CHECK

7/29/1999

8/27/1999

PEND

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Picked up plan to begin review.

Routing - PUBLIC WORKS

7/28/1999

7/29/1999

PASS

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Plan routing begun/TENANTS

7/28/1999

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Route to PUBLIC WORKS, PLAN CHECK and FIRE.

Plan assigned to (MYS)

7/22/1999

7/28/1999

Name:	Marlene Southard
Title:	PLAN REVIEW MANAGER
Phone:	384-3822

Marlene Southard

Plans ACCEPTED BY PLAN TECH

7/26/1999

PASS

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Application received

7/22/1999

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Received Certificate of Value

7/22/1999

PASS

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Routing Off Site - C.D.H

7/22/1999

PASS

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Recd Pcfee & Taken To Pln CK

7/22/1999

Name:
Title:
Phone: