CHANGE STATUS TO (FNL) | | | 9/9/2016 | | DONE |
|
|
|
Had it's final inspection 2-6-2001. Case summary was pulled 9-7-16 and had put permit back into RDY status
|
Permit Ready to Issue | | | 9/7/2016 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Case Summary (BLD) | | | 9/7/2016 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Case Summary (BLD) | | | 12/11/2013 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Fee Review-notes | 6/17/2003 | 6/17/2003 | 6/17/2003 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Permanent occupancy | | | 2/20/2001 | | DONE |
|
|
|
Perm. Occ. Cert. #8577 issued 2-20-01 to the Office Environment Company.
|
Permanent Occupancy | | 2/8/2001 | 2/8/2001 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
BLD-Final | 2/6/2001 | 2/6/2001 | 2/6/2001 | P | PASS |
Jim Storey
|
|
|
###-####
|
FIRE-Final Inspection | 1/12/2001 | 1/16/2001 | 1/16/2001 | A | PASS |
Rick Jackson
|
|
|
Scheduled by a contractor via Hello! on 01/12/2001 at 11:41:35. Contact: ###-####.
|
FIRE-Final Inspection | 1/10/2001 | 1/10/2001 | 1/10/2001 | P | PASS |
|
|
|
Reviewed storage commodity hazard and storage system/elevation and meets requirements.
|
FIRE-Final Inspection | 11/1/2000 | 11/2/2000 | 11/3/2000 | A | FAIL |
Rick Jackson
|
|
|
FIRE FN --MIKE ###-#### reviewed storage height with Bill Alexander and Sam Rogers - storage height is established at max of 18 ft based on mixed commodoties and sprinkelr system design. Left letter stating the storage height limitations with tenant. They will reschedule when storage height is corrected. 11/3/2000 9:30:42 AM
|
BLD-Final | 11/1/2000 | 11/2/2000 | 11/2/2000 | P | FAIL |
Jim Storey
|
|
|
FN OCC-- MIKE ###-####
|
Print Occupancy Form | | | 11/1/2000 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
FIRE-Final Inspection | 10/26/2000 | 10/27/2000 | 10/27/2000 | A | CANC |
Rick Jackson
|
|
|
Dave ###-####
|
BLD-Final | 10/26/2000 | 10/27/2000 | 10/27/2000 | P | CANC |
Jim Storey
|
|
|
dave ###-####
|
Fee Review-notes | 8/30/1999 | | 7/20/2000 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
FIRE-Final Inspection | 5/30/2000 | 5/31/2000 | 5/31/2000 | A | FAIL |
Rick Jackson
|
|
|
Dave ###-#### Sprinklers not complete 6/1/00 11:36:58 AM
|
BLD-Final | 5/30/2000 | 5/31/2000 | 5/31/2000 | A | NR |
Jim Storey
|
|
|
DAve ###-####
|
BLD-Final | 5/16/2000 | 5/17/2000 | 5/17/2000 | A | FAIL |
Jim Storey
|
|
|
Dave ###-####
|
BLD-Framing/Rough-in | 4/24/2000 | 4/25/2000 | 4/25/2000 | A | PASS |
Jim Storey
|
|
|
Scheduled by a contractor via Hello! on 04/24/2000 at 12:48:35. Contact: ###-####.
|
Issue PAID IN FULL permit | | | 3/20/2000 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Inspection Record Card- Bld | | | 3/17/2000 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Print Occupancy Form | | | 3/17/2000 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Telephone call | | | 3/17/2000 | | DONE |
|
|
|
LEFT MESS WITH STAN COLE THAT PERMIT IS READY
|
Routing - PLAN CHECK | 3/16/2000 | 3/16/2000 | 3/16/2000 | | PASS |
|
|
|
CORRECTED SHEET A2.0 & NOTES RECEIVED. ATTACHED TO PLANS, REVIEWED AND APPROVED. ROUTING FOR ISSUANCE OF PERMIT.
|
Plan resubmittals received | | | 3/16/2000 | | DONE |
|
|
|
RECEIVED TWO COPIES OF REVISED SHEET A2.0 FROM COLE ASSOCIATES. ROUTED TO DAN S. KMM
|
Plan assigned to (DRS) | 2/3/2000 | | 3/16/2000 | | PASS |
Dan Stuart
|
|
|
3/16/2000 18:18:00 DRS - activity updated through activity BLDA022 from case BLD99-02619.
|
PLANS/APPL TAKEN TO FRONT DESK | | | 3/16/2000 | | PASS |
|
|
|
ROUTING TO FRONT DESK FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE.
|
Plan resubmittals received | | | 3/15/2000 | | DONE |
|
|
|
RECEIVED PLAN RESUBMITTALS FROM COLE AND ASSOCIATES, MATTHEW RHEES, STRUCTURAL CACULATIONS AND TWO SETS OF SHEET A2.0. 3/15/00 DAR
|
Telephone call | | | 3/15/2000 | | DONE |
|
|
|
CALL TO MATT RHEES CONCERNING PLANS SUBMITTED IN RESPONSE TO PLAN REVIEW COMMMENTS BUT NOT HAVING REQUESTED CHANGES MADE. MATT WILL MAKE CORRECTIONS AND BRING IN NEW SETS TOMMORROW.
|
Plan resubmittals requested | | | 3/15/2000 | | |
|
|
|
REQUESTED OF MATT RHEES THAT PLANS WITH CORRECTION OF NOTE 6 ON SHEET A2.0 BE SUPPLIED SHOWING THE LOAD USED FOR THE MEZZANINE WILL WORK BASED ON NEWW OCCUPANCY USE DECLARATION ON FLOOR PLAN AND IN NOTE 6. USE PROPOSED TO BE DECLARED IS FOR MANUFACTURING AREA ON THE MEZZANINE WHITCH ALLOWS THE 75 PSF LOADING THAT THE EXISTING STRUCTURE WILL SUPPORT. THE EXISTING SYSTEM WILL NOT SUPPORT THE 125 PSF LIVE LOAD REQUIRED BY CODE FOR LIGHT STORAGE, TABLE 16-A, SO ARCHITECT REPORTS OWNER WILL NOT USE IT AS SUCH AND CHANGED THE DECLARED USE.
|
Plan resubmittals requested | | | 3/14/2000 | | FAIL |
|
|
|
Further clarrification and resubmittals required for use of mezzanine area, as originally noted in item #4 of plan review comments. Need to redesignate use of mezzanine for a compatible use based on the 75 psf L.L. design or provide structural upgrades for the 125 psf L.L. required for light storage use designation per Table 16-A, 1997 UBC. Faxed and mailed request for resubmittals to architect, Matt Rhees.
|
Telephone call | | | 3/13/2000 | | PEND |
|
|
|
Call to Matt Rhees to let him know the use and loading of the mezzanine floor area was still in question and that he would need to resolve the concerns with the tenant owner and resubmit their proposal for approval. Matt was not in so I left a voice mail for him.
|
Telephone call | | | 3/13/2000 | | DONE |
|
|
|
Received voice mail from Matt stating that the astructural engineer had informed him that as long as the design Live Load was posted for the mezzanine this was all that was required by code per section 1607.3.3, and this was noted on sheet A2.0, Keynote No. 6. The code section referenced is for concentrated load design requirements when a concentrated load exceeeding the loads of Table 16-A are noted. Section 1607.3 requires the loading noted in Table 16-A to be the minimum design values to be used based on declared use of the area.
|
Routing - PLAN CHECK | 3/2/2000 | | 3/13/2000 | | FAIL |
|
|
|
Incerted resubmittals into original plans. Reviewed resubmittals. Design and designated use of mezzanine for storage area is not incompliance with minimum code for live load design. Engineering was for a 75 psf L.L. and Table 16-A requires a minimum L.L. design of 125 psf be used for light storage designation. This had been reviewed with architect Matt Rhees, by phone, on 3/2/00, when he called to say engineering analysis indicated the present floor system was inadequate for a 125 psf load. He was informed the floor design needed to be modified or reinforced to carry the required minimum loading for light storage or a new designated use needed to be considered for the mezzanine area based on allowable load design per table 16-A. Matt thought the repair area on the main level may be changed to the upper mezzanine level. Manufacturing uses per Table 16-A require use of a 75 psf design load, however this change was not addressed in enginerred structural upgrade or redesignation of area use. Resubmittals addressing method of compliance is required.
|
Plan resubmittals received | | | 3/9/2000 | | DONE |
|
|
|
RECEIVED TWO COPIES OF REVISED SHEETS A0.0, A0.1, A1.0, A2.0. ONE COPY OF PLAN REVIEW COMENTS. ONE COPY OF THREE RESPONSE LETTERS. ROUTED TO DAN S. KMM
|
Routing - FIRE | 2/28/2000 | 3/2/2000 | 3/2/2000 | | PASS |
Bill Alexander
|
|
|
|
Plan resubmittals requested | | | 2/26/2000 | | PEND |
|
|
|
Preliminary plan review determined re-submittal clarifications & details required. Copy faxed & mailed to architect for response.
|
Routing - PLAN CHECK | 2/4/2000 | | 2/26/2000 | | PEND |
|
|
|
Clarifications and re-submittals required. Copy mailed and faxed to architect of record for response. Routing plans to fire code analyst for review.
|
Routing - PUBLIC WORKS | 2/3/2000 | | 2/4/2000 | | PEND |
|
|
|
|
Pending Assignment by MYS | 2/3/2000 | | 2/3/2000 | | DONE |
Marlene Southard
|
|
|
AGREEMENT REACHED WITH ADJACENT PAM OIL TENANT SPACE AND BOISE CITY (DAN STUART & SAM ROGERS) SO THIS PROJECT MAY NOW PROCEED FORWARD. THE PAM OIL SPACE WILL NOT BE AN H OCCUPANCY.
|
Plan routing begun/TENANTS | | | 2/3/2000 | | DONE |
|
|
|
Route to PUBLIC WORKS, PLAN CHECK & FIRE.
|
Plan assigned to (MYS) | 8/30/1999 | | 9/3/1999 | | HOLD |
Marlene Southard
|
|
|
PUT THIS PROJECT ALONG WITH BLD99-2653 ON HOLD AS THE PAM OIL PERMIT (BLD99-0711) MUST BE ISSUED FIRST. SEE FAX MEMO ON FILE TO TIM THORNTON AND MATT RHEES.
|
Recd Pcfee & Taken To Pln CK | | | 8/30/1999 | | |
|
|
|
|
Application received | | | 8/30/1999 | | |
|
|
|
|
Case Summary (BLD) | | | | | |
|
|
|
|