INSP-Final Inspection | 6/24/2002 | 6/24/2002 | 6/24/2002 | P | PASS |
Rick Jackson
|
|
|
Added by Inspector: 409 On 6/24/2002 2:22:31 PM
|
DOC - Permit Finaled | 6/24/2002 | 6/24/2002 | 6/24/2002 | P | PASS |
Rick Jackson
|
|
|
Added by Inspector: 409 On 6/24/2002 2:23:30 PM
|
INSP-Alarm Testing | 6/3/2002 | 6/11/2002 | 6/6/2002 | A | CANC |
Rick Jackson
|
|
|
MICK ###-#### Disp set to [CANC] by a contractor via Hello! on 06/06/2002 at 13:45:33.
|
Issue permit | | | 4/18/2002 | | |
|
|
|
|
Telephone call | | | 4/8/2002 | | DONE |
|
|
|
left mess that permit is ready
|
Sprinkler Plan Check | 3/25/2002 | | 4/8/2002 | | DONE |
Bill Alexander
|
|
|
|
PLANS/APPL TAKEN TO FRONT DESK | | | 4/8/2002 | | DONE |
Bill Alexander
|
|
|
|
Issue and Print Permit | | | 3/19/2002 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Sprinkler Plan Check | 3/13/2002 | | 3/18/2002 | | PART |
Bill Alexander
|
|
|
A. OH-1 hose demand should be 250 and not 100 gpm? (Reference 7-2.3.1.1)
B. Actual sprinkler area density exceeds the same as calculated? (Reference 8-4.4.3.1)
C. Return bend fitting are shorted in the calculations? (Reference 8-4.4.5(a)
D. Include/add node points on the riser section, that correlate with calculation input. (Reference 8-1.1.1(34)
E.Piping on the plan starting at node 8 does not correlate with calcs? (Reference 8-1.1.1(34)
F. Provide information on how this added system will be drained. (8-1.1.1, UFC 1001.3)
G. No information was provided for electric activation operation of this fire suppression system. Is the detection/releasing/monitoring panel a "Reliable" or another brand. No data provided other than electrical by others? If another brand, it must be listed and compatible. This releasing panel must be connected to an existing alarm panel.
H. The Reliable Supertrol submittal data indicates a "Non-Supervised" System. Page 2 item "B" would indicate a supervised system. Explain how this system verbifies the integrity of this systems piping, and provide data.
|
PLANS/APPL TAKEN TO FRONT DESK | | | 3/18/2002 | | DONE |
Bill Alexander
|
|
|
Requires resubmittal prior to inspections.
|
Plan assigned to (Bill) | 3/7/2002 | | 3/18/2002 | | DONE |
|
|
|
3/18/2002 16:38:47 JWA - activity updated through activity FIRA22 from case FIR02-00082.
|
Sprinkler Plan Check | 3/7/2002 | | 3/11/2002 | | FAIL |
Bill Alexander
|
|
|
Lack elevation and riser detail to verify calculations. Room system protection is designed for Light Hazard and occupancy is Ordinary Group 1. No sprinkler head data submitted.
|
Telephone call | | | 3/11/2002 | | DONE |
|
|
|
Tom Easton called and we conversed over the lacking information and under design of the submittal. He will submit new plans, including sprinkler head data.
|
Telephone call | | | 3/8/2002 | | DONE |
|
|
|
Called Tom Easton @ Grinnell 3:15 pm, (not in), to verify room identfication (occupancy hazard classification) protecting. Covering an energen system area? Need to know if this is replacing it or in conjuction with it? Existing riser detail was conveniently omitted from plan?
|
Application received | | | 3/7/2002 | | |
|
|
|
|
Case Summary | | | | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Inspection Record Card- Fire | 4/8/2002 | | | | |
|
|
|
|