INSP-Final Inspection | 5/22/2003 | 5/22/2003 | 5/22/2003 | A | CANC |
Rick Jackson
|
|
|
wrong permit added by 409 5/22/2003 9:50:45 AM
|
INSP-Final Inspection | 4/25/2003 | 4/25/2003 | 4/25/2003 | P | PASS |
Rick Jackson
|
|
|
Scheduled by a contractor via Hello! on 4/25/2003 at 7:17:12 AM. Contact: ###-####.
|
DOC - Permit Finaled | 4/25/2003 | 4/25/2003 | 4/25/2003 | P | PASS |
Rick Jackson
|
|
|
Finaled by inspector at 4/25/2003 3:38:06 PM
|
INSP-Final Inspection | 4/17/2003 | 4/24/2003 | 4/24/2003 | P | FAIL |
Rick Jackson
|
|
|
BRIAN; Phone #: ###-#### Internet Inspection Request from: Marsha Smylie need approved plans; tested initiating devices/flow/tampers/PIV; will need to test for troubles at panel (phone line, battery) and get record of completion 4/24/2003 3:35:25 PM
|
Alarm Plan Check | | | 3/28/2003 | | PASS |
|
|
|
Approved plan modification to relocate the FACP, MPS and horn/strobe.
|
PLANS/APPL TAKEN TO FRONT DESK | | | 3/28/2003 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Inspection Record Card- Fire | 3/28/2003 | | 3/28/2003 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Telephone call | | | 3/28/2003 | | |
|
|
|
|
Issue permit | | | 3/28/2003 | | |
|
|
|
|
Plan resubmittals received | | | 3/26/2003 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Issue permit | | | 3/10/2003 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Plan assigned to (SAM) | 2/6/2003 | | 3/4/2003 | | DONE |
|
|
|
3/4/2003 13:56:11 SLR - activity updated through activity FIRA22 from case FIR03-00053.
|
Alarm Plan Check | | | 3/4/2003 | | PASS |
|
|
|
resubmittal acceptable.
|
PLANS/APPL TAKEN TO FRONT DESK | | | 3/4/2003 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Inspection Record Card- Fire | 3/4/2003 | | 3/4/2003 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Inspection Record Card- Fire | 3/4/2003 | | 3/4/2003 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Telephone call | | | 3/4/2003 | | |
|
|
|
|
Plan resubmittals received | | | 2/20/2003 | | DONE |
|
|
|
To Sam Rogers
|
Alarm Plan Check | | | 2/13/2003 | | FAIL |
|
|
|
Application is incorrect. Bldg permit shown has been finaled and does not match the area of FA work. Need correct building permit to determine which Code applies for this project. Incorrect occupacy shown; design does not match the occupancy shown, under either Code. Unusual line and lettering fonts make it difficult to decipher the intended representations. Copy of partial review coments faxed to Simplex.
|
Application received | | | 2/6/2003 | | |
|
|
|
|