| INSP-Alarm Testing | 5/18/2004 | 5/19/2004 | 5/19/2004 | P | PASS |
 Rick Jackson
|
|
|
Cell PH. ###-####; Phone #: ###-#### Internet Inspection Request from: Daniel Buccino
|
| DOC - Permit Finaled | 5/19/2004 | 5/19/2004 | 5/19/2004 | P | PASS |
Rick Jackson
|
|
|
Finaled by inspector at 5/19/2004 4:47:45 PM
|
| Plan assigned to (Mary) | 2/20/2004 | | 5/10/2004 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
| Alarm Plan Check | | | 5/10/2004 | | PASS |
|
|
|
Approved pending field inspection of fire alarm permit comments.
|
| Telephone call | | | 5/10/2004 | | DONE |
|
|
|
Paul Marcolina and John James, teh cut sheet for the power suppoly was stapled to the back of the IR smoke detector cut sheet. I will process these permits today.
|
| PLANS/APPL TAKEN TO FRONT DESK | | | 5/10/2004 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
| Inspection Record Card- Fire | 5/10/2004 | | 5/10/2004 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
| Permit Ready to Issue | | | 5/10/2004 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
| Telephone call | | | 5/10/2004 | | DONE |
|
|
|
email permit ready and fee due
|
| Issue and Print Permit | | | 5/10/2004 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
| Miscellaneous action | | | 5/6/2004 | | DONE |
|
|
|
E-mail: To Paul, copied Justin Wood (designer) that battery calculations for the Vesda system are required. They may e-mail or fax them to me.
|
| Miscellaneous action | | | 4/29/2004 | | DONE |
|
|
|
E-mail:
Paul,
The previously approved alternative agent suppression systems designed and installed on specific tools utilizing TMA, pyphoric liquid may be installed on any tool utilizing phyporic liquid located in any H-5 occupancy on the Boise site. Of course, maximum allowable quantities for phyphoric liquid in the International Fire Code (IFC, 2000) are not to be exceeded.
I will be processing the current outstanding permit applications. If you have any questions, please feel free to call.
Mary
>>> 04/23/04 02:27PM >>>
Mary,
1. Alox is not TMA, it is a process utilizing TMA.
2. Per our response below on project C7147, the request and ultimate
approval of the referenced alternate was to allow Micron to operate
under the chemical quantity limits as prescribed in the 2000 edition of
the International Fire Code (IFC), as opposed to the UFC quantities in
force at the time for Micron Buildings 24 D and C. At that time, and as
a part of the request for Alternate, we did demonstrate our method of
fire suppression for a pyrophoric liquid along with many other code
required protection systems to demonstrate to the city the safeties that
would be in place. These safety systems continue to be designed and
installed per the code and do not require any alternate or agreement
that would limit their application in any H-5 area. The IFC quantity
limits are now the adopted and prescribed code limits for the city of
Boise. As such, these apply without additional requirements for an
alternative proposal and would not be restricted to any particular H-5
occupancy.
I just spoke with David Miller regarding this issue. Some alternates
that Micron has in place are building or Project specific. The
alternate that you are referencing, however, is now defunct, and I am
copying Dave at his request to make sure that we are all of the same
understanding on this issue.
Please call with any additional questions.
Thanks,
Paul
-----Original Message-----
From: Mary Froemke [mailto:MFroemke@cityofboise.org]
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2004 2:42 PM
To: pdmarcolina
Cc: Samuel Rogers; blrice; jvelikoff
Subject: Re: FIR04-00126 C7098 - F1X Convert CVTR 148 to Alox
Paul,
Two items,
1) Is the Alox actuallly TMA?
2) Per the agreement dated May 8, 2002, only buildings 24 and 24D have
been approved. This permit is in Fab 1X. Therefore, I have a call into
Dave Miller in regards to Fab 1X.
Thanks,
Mary |
| Miscellaneous action | | | 4/23/2004 | | DONE |
|
|
|
E-mail: In reviewing the Alarm Permits being held pending the Proprietary
Chemical issue meeting with Dave Miller, we realized that the referenced
permit/Project is utilizing the previously approved TMA and not an
alternative pyrophoric chemical.
We would appreciate the completion of this review and permit issuance at
your earliest convenience, as the Project schedule for that installation
continues to be impacted.
My response: Paul,
Two items,
1) Is the Alox actuallly TMA?
2) Per the agreement dated May 8, 2002, only buildings 24 and 24D have been approved. This permit is in Fab 1X. Therefore, I have a call into Dave Miller in regards to Fab 1X.
Answer from Dave Miller, Mary sent an e-mail to Paul that stated:
Paul,
In response to item #2 in yesterday's e-mail (see attached), Dave Miller has requested that you submit a formal request when you want to use the TMA suppression system in buildings other than 24 or 24D.
Please call if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Mary
|
| Telephone call | | | 3/4/2004 | | DONE |
|
|
|
Call with Paul Marcolina regarding the "labeling" of the chemical. Paul stated there is a meeting tomorrow, so this FIR should fall into the same line as FIR04-00116 and be placed on hold.
|
| Application received | | | 2/20/2004 | | |
|
|
|
|