Information based on query as of Tuesday, July 16, 2024.
Permit Information
Permit NumberFIR05-00480
StatusFinaled
Name SHILO AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER CO
Site Address 3657 S T-K AVE
Project NameSPR OH SFP II BUILDING 2
Customer Number 
ePlanReview 
Description
SFP II BUILDING 2 * To install a complete overhead fire sprinkler system meeting BMC 7-01-56-903.1.6, High Piled Combustible Storage Warehouse, in a new 29,370-ft/2, one story, concrete tilt-up shell office/warehouse building with a 140-ft/2 fire riser/electrical room, constructed at the east end of the building and six, 12'x14' overhead doors at the north wall (BLD permit addresses two?). This is a shell permit only and no occupancy is allowed under this permit. A separate T.I. permit will be required to finish this building for occupancy. The fire sprinkler system work shall comply with the IFC 2003, the attached review comments/conditions, as regulated by the Fire Chief. The review comments/conditions, permit and fire "Inspection Card" are required to be on site as a condition of this work, to provide witness of compliance verification of minimum code. This permit is attached to building permit: BLD05-00467
Contact Information
See Activities list for contact information
Show Inspection Activities Only
DescriptionReceivedRequestedCompletedAM/PMDispositionAssigned To 
INSP-Final Inspection11/10/200511/14/200511/14/2005APASS
DetailsForrest France
Fire sprinkler permit finaled.
INSP-Final Inspection11/9/200511/10/200511/10/2005ACANC
DetailsTroy Cobbley
No time for inspection
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in9/28/20059/28/20059/29/2005PFAIL
DetailsForrest France
EC25's are overspaced at southeast side branch line above where unit heater has been deleted, in three locations upright heads are directly below roof/smoke hatches, need verification of approval on changes in the mech. and electrical rooms.
INSP-Conference9/29/20059/29/20059/29/2005PDONE
DetailsForrest France
Conversation with contractor regarding area at SE corner in which heads are overspaced, also discussed three locations at roof hatches with EC25 sprinklers directly below the hatch opening.
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro9/27/20059/27/20059/27/2005PPART
DetailsForrest France
Overhead hydrostatic test passed inspection.
Inspection Record Card- Fire9/1/2005 9/1/2005 DONE
Permit Ready to Issue  9/1/2005 DONE
Telephone call  9/1/2005 DONE
tlk to trent bice ###-#### that permit and fees are ready to be picked up
Issue permit  9/1/2005 DONE
Plan assigned to (Bill)8/8/2005 8/31/2005 DONE
Sprinkler Plan Check8/18/2005 8/31/2005 PASS
DetailsBill Alexander
PLANS/APPL TAKEN TO FRONT DESK  8/31/2005 DONE
Plan resubmittals received  8/18/2005  
Sprinkler Plan Check8/8/2005 8/17/2005 FAIL
DetailsBill Alexander
1. This is a "SPEC" warehouse where the design has anticipated 200 gpm in-rack sprinkler allowance, which was taken off prior to entering the building as a hose allowance? Reverify the calculations with the demand located at the anticipated location off the riser and resubmit for a correct hydraulic verification. (BMC 7-01-50-901.2, IFC 105.4.2)

2. Fire sprinklers shall be positioned with respect to branch lines to be offset horizontally a minimum of 12" from the pipe, or be supplied by a riser nipple to elevate the sprinkler deflector a minimum of 13" from the centerline of 2½" pipe. Revise and resubmit. (NFPA 13-8.11.5.2.2)

3. It is understood (Stan Beus) that underground permit FIR05-00464 has some field modifications, either made or found. The existing tap is 6". Provide United Water supply piping which shall include size of city main in street and whether dead end or circulating; if dead end, direction and distance to nearest circulating main, and system elevation relative to test hydrant (see A.15.1.8 Include and provide these modifications by resubmittal incorporating them in this permit, which shall include connection at the tee and not the gate valve as shown on FP1. (BMC 7-01-50-901.2, IFC 105.4.2, NFPA 13-14.1.3[10])

4. Trapeze hanger shall be engineered and addressed on the plans, relating and corresponding to the location, size of main/line, etc., by the designer as addressed in 14.1.3(22) and required per IFC 105.4.2, BMC 7-01-53-903.1.3. Trapeze hanger detail shall clearly address engineering matching this projects structural design. It is not field installer responsibilities to determine the engineering of such hangers since many do not have that capability, information or education to field determine minimum trapeze hanger requirements.
a. Identify the actual span (scaled, it exceed 7'-0"), and pipe using in the trapeze hangers for the 6" cross mains on the plan. The pipe schedule (10 or schedule 40, etc.) incorporating shall also be addressed on the plan.
b. Designer is incorporating 2 hangers on each end of a rod connected to the trapeze, (what is addressed as: "Double Ring Hanger assembly"). Identify the rod size (9.1.2.1). Identify the hanger size/type on both ends of the rod (9.1.1.6.5). Address how that hanger on the top of the rod will be retained from slipping (9.1.1.6.4) on the trapeze, on the plan.
c. The trapeze is spanning two trusses with hangers located at what appears to be at a maximum allowed spacing (9.2.2.1). Has the designer verified with the structural engineer, that maximum spacing is acceptable for the trapezed, parallel 6" mains? It shall be the installers/designers responsibility to verify structural acceptance loads at these supporting points, on structural members (trusses).
(BMC 7-01-50-901.2, 912.2.1.1, IFC 104.7.2, 105.4.2, 912.2.1, NFPA 13-14.1.3[10], 14.1.3[22], IBC 1604.3, 1604.4)

5. Pipe type and schedule of wall thickness shall be addressed on the plans. Include fitting types used off the main, connecting to the riser, top of risers connecting to schedule 10 lines. (NFPA 13-9.3.3*, A.9.3.3, A.9.3.2, 14.1.3 [18, 21])

6. Plan FP1, riser has a side note addressing a 2.5" forward flow is sufficient and the riser detail key notes address a 4"butterfly valve on a 4" bypass in the FDC?. Correlated a correct design intention on the plan. (BMC 7-01-50-901.2, IFC 105.4.2)

7. Electrical room #101 is overspaced for OH occupancy protection. Reference NFPA 8.5.2.1.2 on how protection area of coverage is derived.
Miscellaneous action  8/17/2005 DONE
Returned failed plans to permit desk for return and corrections.
Telephone call  8/17/2005 DONE
called Trent told him to pick up plans per failed, no fees
Telephone call  8/17/2005 DONE
plans failed per bill a.
Application received  8/8/2005