Boise PDS Online - FIR05-00570

Information based on query as of Sunday, August 18, 2024.

Permit Information

Permit Number	FIR05-00570
Status	Finaled
Name	TREASURE VALLEY FIRE PROTECTION
Site Address	1487 S DAVID LN
Project Name	SPR INS NETWORK AMERICA
Customer Number
ePlanReview
Description	INSURANCE NETWORK AMERICA OFFICE BUILDING - To install a complete overhead and combustible cavity fire protection system in a new 7,800-ft/2, one story wood framed office building. The underground fire service supply lead-in was installed under FIR05-00460. All fire sprinkler system work shall comply with the IFC 2003, the attached review comments/conditions, as regulated by the Fire Chief. The review comments/conditions, permit and fire "Inspection Card" are required to be on site as a condition of this work, to provide witness of compliance verification of minimum code. This permit is attached to building permit: BLD05-01669.

Contact Information

See Activities list for contact information

Permit Details Project Related Cases Activities Conditions Parcel Fees Valuation Documents Permit Summary Report

Show Inspection Activities Only

Description

Received

Requested

Completed

AM/PM

Disposition

Assigned To

INSP-Final Inspection

3/3/2006

PASS

Name:	Troy Cobbley
Title:	FIRE INSPECTOR
Phone:	794-9483

Troy Cobbley

Permit finaled

INSP-Final Inspection

2/16/2006

PART

Name:	Forrest France
Title:	FIRE INSPECTOR
Phone:	794-1981

Forrest France

The following items remain for final, need to provide for requirements of note #24 on plan review comments regarding one hour riser room construction or PIV installation, perform the forward flow test for the backflow prevention device, provide and attatch hydraulic calc. sticker to the riser.

INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro

2/9/2006

2/10/2006

PART

Name:	Forrest France
Title:	FIRE INSPECTOR
Phone:	794-1981

Forrest France

Hydrostatic test of the overhead fire sprinkler passed.

INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in

12/2/2005

12/5/2005

PART

Name:	Forrest France
Title:	FIRE INSPECTOR
Phone:	794-1981

Forrest France

Verified the unsprinklered cavity at the west dormer has been completely filled with noncombustible insulation per the exception of NFPA 13 8.14.1.2.7. Overhead rough-in is good for cover.

INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro

11/18/2005

PART

Name:	Forrest France
Title:	FIRE INSPECTOR
Phone:	794-1981

Forrest France

Overhead fire sprinkler rough-in is okay to cover pending verification of coverage for the dormer at the west roof that is not currrently protected, also will need to verify no obstructions develop after the insulation is installed at the roof.

Plan assigned to (Bill)

9/2/2005

11/9/2005

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Sprinkler Plan Check

10/17/2005

11/9/2005

PASS

Name:	Bill Alexander
Title:	FIRE PLANREVIEWER
Phone:	794-9469

Bill Alexander

PLANS/APPL TAKEN TO FRONT DESK

11/9/2005

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Permit Ready to Issue

11/9/2005

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Inspection Record Card- Fire

11/9/2005

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Telephone call

11/9/2005

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Called Brad & told him permit ready & fees on 11-9-05 @ 2:18 by BAS

Issue and Print Permit

11/9/2005

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Plan resubmittals received

10/17/2005

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Telephone call

10/13/2005

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

called and left messge w/Crystal for Jeff Anderson that permit failed and can pick up

Telephone call

10/13/2005

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

customer for treasure valley fire protection picked up plans

Sprinkler Plan Check

9/21/2005

10/12/2005

FAIL

Name:	Bill Alexander
Title:	FIRE PLANREVIEWER
Phone:	794-9469

Bill Alexander

1. "Reception Area" system calculations:
a. Test area/density head pressure is not for 225-ft/2 spacing as designed, but for a 7 psi minimum head pressure.
b. Calc Nodes 17 to 40 has a butterfly valve for fittings used.
Revise and resubmit a design that meets NFPA 13-14.4.

2. Plan provided have nodes, pipe lengths and dimensioning blended with lines throughout this plan, making it very difficult, if not impossible to interpret for verification of IFC fire protection installation code. Revise and submit plans that are clear and legible.

3. "N.T.S." for the only section view is unacceptable. Provide section view with a correct and identifiable scale.

4. All pendant sprinkler in this facility are using "401" Escutcheons? Provide clarification if there are some obstructions. Plans show "boxes," yet section provides nothing to clarify what they are? Provide plans that include information relating to fire sprinkler design requirements.

5. Correct sprinkler head legend, Reliable F3QR SIN number.

6. Reduction area used in calculations Area #2 is identified as "System #1, Area 1 (on plan FP-2).

7. Calc Area #3, does not meet the minimum remote area of operation required to be verified per 11.2.3.1.5 and does not qualify for the "Room Design Method" in 11.2.3.3. Plan lacks enough detail to determine appropriate separation requirements (addressed in Table 11.2.3.1.1 = 60 minutes) and would not be allowed with an "accordion slider," therefore area of operation must be extended to the area required in 11.2.3.1.5 (15oo-ft/2 with allowable allowance for ceiling reduction incorporating Q.R. sprinkler per 11.2.3.2.3.1). Please revise and resubmit.

8. Address seismic requirements per NFPA 13-14.1.3(39). Include locations and type.

9. Data submittal provided for backflow is identifying a 4" and metric flow?

Sprinkler Plan Check

9/26/2005

10/12/2005

FAIL

Name:	Bill Alexander
Title:	FIRE PLANREVIEWER
Phone:	794-9469

Bill Alexander

1. "RECEPTION AREA", Test area/density head pressure is not for 225-ft/2 spacing as designed, but for a 7 psi minimum operating head pressure. .10/14.62 = 146-ft/2 maximum area per head verifying and designers head spacing exceed this.
2. "RECEPTION AREA" design is flawed. Ceiling slope exceeds 2 in 12, so area of operation must be increased by 30 percent without revising the density when quick-response sprinklers are used.

Miscellaneous action

10/12/2005

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Taken the failed review documents to the permit desk for returning adn required desing corrections

Miscellaneous action

10/5/2005

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Requested Early Start. 1st review failed, 9/21/2005. 2nd resubmittal received 9/23/2005, failed 10/12/2005. Early Start was approved per attached requirements.

Plan resubmittals received

9/23/2005

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Miscellaneous action

9/21/2005

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

I have taken the failed review documents to the permit desk for returning

Telephone call

9/21/2005

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Left message for Jeff that plans failed and need picked up///9/21/05 12:05pm BAS

Case Summary

9/2/2005

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Application received

9/2/2005

Name:
Title:
Phone: