INSP-Final Inspection | 1/27/2006 | 1/27/2006 | 1/27/2006 | P | PASS |
Troy Cobbley
|
|
|
Permit finaled
|
INSP-Final Inspection | 12/21/2005 | 12/21/2005 | 12/21/2005 | P | CANC |
Troy Cobbley
|
|
|
contact; Matt - Final; Phone #: ###-#### Internet Inspection Request from: Alicia Pauley Inspection cancelled from web by: Alicia Pauley
|
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro | 11/18/2005 | 11/18/2005 | 11/18/2005 | P | PASS |
Troy Cobbley
|
|
|
Sprinkler piping is ok to cover. Superintendant witnessed the hydro test and it supposedly passed. Will need to get the test cert. Wrong backflow preventor has been installed and will need verification the one that is installed will work.
|
CHANGE STATUS TO (ISS) | | | 11/15/2005 | | DONE |
|
|
|
changed status to issued-done previously
|
(F) Reprint permit | | | 11/15/2005 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Permit Ready to Issue | | | 11/14/2005 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Telephone call | | | 11/14/2005 | | DONE |
|
|
|
left mess that permit is ready
|
Plan assigned to (Bill) | 11/3/2005 | | 11/11/2005 | | DONE |
Bill Alexander
|
|
|
|
Sprinkler Plan Check | 11/3/2005 | | 11/11/2005 | | PASS |
Bill Alexander
|
|
|
Field Modification in the remote test, etc.
|
PLANS/APPL TAKEN TO FRONT DESK | | | 11/11/2005 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Plan resubmittals received | | | 11/3/2005 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
INSP-Supply line flush | 10/31/2005 | 11/1/2005 | 11/1/2005 | A | PASS |
Troy Cobbley
|
|
|
underground flush passed.
|
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro | 10/27/2005 | 10/28/2005 | 10/28/2005 | P | FAIL |
Troy Cobbley
|
|
|
Piping as installed does not match plans. Wall layout does not match plans. Additional 90's and Tee's have been installed including in the remote area and piping has been rerouted. Heads have been deleted in restrooms but added in area immediately outside of the restrooms. Wall layout has changed. Resubmit updated plans for approvals.
|
Inspection Record Card- Fire | 10/25/2005 | | 10/25/2005 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Permit Ready to Issue | | | 10/25/2005 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Telephone call | | | 10/25/2005 | | DONE |
|
|
|
called ###-#### and told Catherine that permit is ready and fees, no answer at ###-#### for John V.
|
Issue permit | | | 10/25/2005 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Plan assigned to (Bill) | 10/21/2005 | | 10/24/2005 | | DONE |
Bill Alexander
|
|
|
|
PLANS/APPL TAKEN TO FRONT DESK | | | 10/24/2005 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Sprinkler Plan Check | 10/21/2005 | | 10/24/2005 | | PASS |
Bill Alexander
|
|
|
|
Sprinkler Plan Check | 10/4/2005 | | 10/21/2005 | | PART |
Bill Alexander
|
|
|
3. Calculations are flawed. Calculation addressing "#1 Area #1 Flat Ceiling Second Floor" is incorporating the same 5.2 K-factor sprinklers, yet calculated with a 4.9 K-factor?
4. The plans and calculations do not correlate. Both calculations have different piping from node 1 through node 2. Provide correct plans and calculations which match.
5. The plans and calculations do not correlate? Calculation cover sheets indicate copper penetrating the floor for the riser and the plans address CPVC transitioned to sched 40 pipe? Calculations address CPVC to Copper to the backflow device. The calculations shall be incorporated and used in this system and CPVC shall not be exposed above the floor of this room or requirements for vertically exposed CPVC protection (per pipe listing) will be required and verified.
7. Per data submittals provided, a Tyco DY-PA33 (or equivalent) bypass line is required around this devise. Show it on the plans.
8. Calculations are flawed. This buildings fire sprinkler system requires a riser with an FDC connection and thus may be charged with water from the same supply that the fire sprinkler system is being supplied from. This means that the calculations shall include 100 gpm (minimum) deducted off the supply prior to entering this building. (NFPA 13R-6.7.4)
9. Provide water supply certificate/document and include it with this permit submittal.
|
Inspection Record Card- Fire | 10/21/2005 | | 10/21/2005 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Telephone call | | | 10/21/2005 | | DONE |
|
|
|
called ###-#### and told John that permit is ready for pick-up
|
Plan resubmittals received | | | 10/21/2005 | | |
Bill Alexander
|
|
|
|
Issue permit | | | 10/20/2005 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Plan assigned to (Bill) | 9/13/2005 | | 10/4/2005 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Sprinkler Plan Check | 9/18/2005 | | 10/4/2005 | | PART |
Bill Alexander
|
|
|
1st Submittal Partially approved
1. Calculations and plans do not correlate. Calculation #1 Area #1:
a. Riser nodes 7 to 8 show 1" CPVC on the plans but were calculated with 1¼" CPVC piping?
b. Node 8 to 9 should be with a Tee, not an ell?
c. Node 12 to 101 should be with a Tee, not an ell?
Revise and correct plans, or reverify piping with correct calculations and resubmit.
2. Calculations and plans do not correlate. Calculation #1 Area #2 riser nodes 17 to 18 and pipe 18 to 19 show 1" CPVC on the plans but were calculated with 1¼" CPVC piping? Revise and correct plans, or verify piping with correct calculations and resubmit.
3. Calculations are flawed. Calculation addressing "#1 Area #1 Flat Ceiling Second Floor" is incorporating the same 5.2 K-factor sprinklers, yet calculated with a 4.9 K-factor?
4. The plans and calculations do not correlate. Both calculations have different piping from node 1 through node 2. Provide correct plans and calculations which match.
5. The plans and calculations do not correlate? Calculation cover sheets indicate copper penetrating the floor for the riser and the plans address CPVC transitioned to sched 40 pipe? Calculations address CPVC to Copper to the backflow device. The calculations shall be incorporated and used in this system and CPVC shall not be exposed above the floor of this room or requirements for vertically exposed CPVC protection (per pipe listing) will be required and verified.
6. The plans and calculations do not correlate? Plan FP1 of 2 shows the underground being installed as CPVC and the Calculation cover sheets address polybutylene?
7. Per data submittals provided, a Tyco DY-PA33 (or equivalent) bypass line is required around this devise.
8. Plans lacking detail. No light fixtures or fan (if applicable) location identified in this submittal. These items clearly interfere with correct sprinkler density distribution with residential sprinkler installations. Fire testing has proven the need to wet walls in the area protected by residential sprinklers at a level closer to the ceiling than that accomplished by standard sprinkler distribution in commercial properties. Where beams, light fixtures, sloped ceilings, and other obstructions occur, additional residential sprinklers are necessary to achieve proper response and distribution. In addition, for sloped ceilings, higher flow rates are normally required. Installation shall be per the manufacturers listed installation requirements. Reference NFPA 13R-6.7.1.5.3*. IFC Inspector will verify obstruction to head installation locations.
9. Provide plan information showing where all the sloped ceilings are in this facility. Head spacing in sloped ceilings shall be measured along the slope, which means some dimensioning on the 2nd level are probably wrong. Maximum allowed spacing will be 8'-0" off any wall and 16' between heads measured along the slope with not exceptions. Reference head listing installation data and verify your design spacing.
10. Calculations are flawed. This buildings fire sprinkler system requires a riser with an FDC connection and thus may be charged with water from the same supply that the fire sprinkler system is being supplied from. This means that the calculations shall include 100 gpm (minimum) deducted off the supply prior to entering this building. (NFPA 13R-6.7.4)
11. Provide water supply certificate/document and include it with this permit submittal.
|
PLANS/APPL TAKEN TO FRONT DESK | | | 10/4/2005 | | DONE |
|
|
|
1st Submittal
|
Plan resubmittals received | | | 10/4/2005 | | |
|
|
|
|
Inspection Record Card- Fire | 10/4/2005 | | 10/4/2005 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Permit Ready to Issue | | | 10/4/2005 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Telephone call | | | 10/4/2005 | | DONE |
|
|
|
called ###-#### and left voicemessage that permit is ready and fees
|
Application received | | | 9/13/2005 | | |
|
|
|
|