Case Summary | | | 2/19/2008 | | |
|
|
|
|
INSP-Final Inspection | 1/15/2008 | 1/16/2008 | 1/16/2008 | A | PASS |
Troy Cobbley
|
|
|
Permit finaled
|
INSP-Final Inspection | 1/14/2008 | 1/15/2008 | 1/15/2008 | P | FAIL |
Troy Cobbley
|
|
|
Forward flush passed. To final the project the 1 1/4" branchline needs to be relocated around the electrical room.
|
INSP-Final Inspection | 1/14/2008 | 1/14/2008 | 1/15/2008 | P | CANC |
Troy Cobbley
|
|
|
Mike B is the contact. Thanks Phone #: ###-#### Internet Inspection Request from: Stan Beus
|
PLANS/APPL TAKEN TO FRONT DESK | | | 12/18/2007 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Inspection Record Card- Fire | 12/18/2007 | | 12/18/2007 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Telephone call | | | 12/18/2007 | | DONE |
|
|
|
tlk to lilly ###-#### that permit and fees are ready to be picked up
|
Permit Ready to Issue | | | 12/18/2007 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Issue and Print Permit | | | 12/18/2007 | | |
|
|
|
|
Sprinkler Plan Check | 12/10/2007 | | 12/16/2007 | | PASS |
|
|
|
Note: This was the 5th review of these plans. As-Built plans are approved by Bryan Johnson
|
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro | 12/13/2007 | 12/14/2007 | 12/14/2007 | A | PASS |
Troy Cobbley
|
|
|
The second floor hydro test passed. The second floor sprinkler piping is ok to cover. I spent an extended amount of time pointing out fire proofing that had not been repaired. There were also loose hanger rings. I stated again that resubmittals would be required.
|
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro | 12/11/2007 | 12/13/2007 | 12/13/2007 | A | CANC |
Troy Cobbley
|
|
|
Per Nate this is for a hydro test which can not be done due to a head leaking that needs replaced.
|
Plan resubmittals received | | | 12/10/2007 | | |
|
|
|
received "5" sets of plans with app & submittal sheet with each plan--put plans on fire shelf
|
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in | 12/5/2007 | 12/6/2007 | 12/7/2007 | P | PASS |
Troy Cobbley
|
|
|
The first floor sprinkler piping can be covered.
|
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in | 11/30/2007 | 12/4/2007 | 12/4/2007 | A | FAIL |
Troy Cobbley
|
|
|
The rooms where the sprinkler piping is ok to cover in area #1 are marked on the plans. The other areas of area #1 still need fire proofing patched where all trades are destroying the fire patching.
|
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro | 11/28/2007 | 11/30/2007 | 11/30/2007 | A | PART |
Troy Cobbley
|
|
|
The hydro test for the first floor passed. This does not include either of the canopies. I stopped the rough-in inspection for the first floor due to wire still being attached to the sprinkler piping, lose hangers, missing hangers, earthquake bracing not being installed and no patching of the fire proofing has been done yet. Also the sprinkler plans will need to be resubmitted to show the changes which include the deletion of the PIV.
|
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro | 11/28/2007 | 11/30/2007 | 11/28/2007 | A | CANC |
Troy Cobbley
|
|
|
Leroy is the contact. Thanks Phone #: ###-#### Internet Inspection Request from: Stan Beus Inspection cancelled from web by: Stan Beus
|
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in | 11/26/2007 | 11/27/2007 | 11/27/2007 | P | PART |
Troy Cobbley
|
|
|
The north canopy piping has been corrected and can be covered. The west canopy piping has not been corrected and can not be covered. The remaining hard lids on the second floor can be covered. These were the only three items inspected today.
|
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in | 11/21/2007 | 11/23/2007 | 11/23/2007 | A | PART |
Troy Cobbley
|
|
|
See the city approved plans for locations where piping is ok to cover above the remaining hardlid areas. The exterior canopies are ok to cover except where shown on the plans. This is due to the pipe sizes installed not matching what is shown on the plans. The fire sprinkler contractor did not show the pipe size on the piping in question on the north canopy. Since the fire sprinkler contractor did not provide the pipe sizing and center to center length I had to look at the hydraulic calculations to verify this pipe size. The calculstions state the piping between nodes 12 and 87 to be 2". The fire sprinkler contractor has installed both 2" and 1 1/2" pipe between these two node points. The exterior piping in the west canopy is installed as 2 1/2" but is shown as 2" on the plans. Again installation does not match the city approved plans. I also noted many locations where electrical wiring has been attached to the sprinkler piping and to the all thread rods. The fire sprinkler contractor needs to resubmit correct as-built plans or install this project per approved plans. Also there were locations that the sprinkler plans show pendant sprinklers but per the general contractor there will be no ceilings and only the structure above. These changes shall also be shown on a corrected set of city approved as-builts.
|
PLANS/APPL TAKEN TO FRONT DESK | | | 11/21/2007 | | |
|
|
|
|
Inspection Record Card- Fire | 11/21/2007 | | 11/21/2007 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Inspection Record Card- Fire | 11/21/2007 | | 11/21/2007 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Permit Ready to Issue | | | 11/21/2007 | | |
|
|
|
|
Issue and Print Permit | | | 11/21/2007 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Sprinkler Plan Check | 11/5/2007 | | 11/19/2007 | | PASS |
|
|
|
Note
This was the 4th review. Plans are approved by Bryan Johnson
|
Miscellaneous action | | | 10/24/2007 | | DONE |
|
|
|
Decision reached on contractor's requrest for Light Haz sprinkler design for ambulance drive through. Design shall be OH1, as indicated on the 10/10/07 plan review comments. This is consistent with NFPA 13 based on automobile parking, and with the actual design of other Southwest ID Advanced Care facilities and similar healthcare facilities built throughout the Treasure Valley by other sprinkler contractors.
|
Plan resubmittals received | | | 10/24/2007 | | |
|
|
|
received fire app (1) sheet & "5" sets of plans- plans put on fire shelf
|
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in | 10/22/2007 | 10/22/2007 | 10/22/2007 | P | PASS |
|
|
|
Partial roughin inspection of selected bathrooms only on 1st and 2nd floor, see onsite plans for restrooms marked in red as okay for cover. I spoke to general contractor for patching spray on fireproofing at sprinkler hanger locations.
|
Miscellaneous action | | | 10/22/2007 | | DONE |
|
|
|
Received emailed letter from Architect dated 10/17/07 indicating the drive-through will only be used for pickup and delivery of patients, no parking of amublance or other vehicles. Doc attached.
|
Sprinkler Plan Check | | | 10/17/2007 | | FAIL |
|
|
|
These plans were denied based on calculation errors and lack of details requested in initial review. Upon request, the denied set may be retrieved from my office for salvage. Denied plans will be maintained for 5 business days.
|
Telephone call | | | 10/17/2007 | | DONE |
|
|
|
Called Randy Knudson to discuss Shiloh's request for a rough-in inspection prior to "issued" plans. Copy of email: Randy,
The problem with doing rough-in inspections at this time, is that there are no approved plans to inspect to and there is not a way to schedule an inspection until the permit is in the "issued" status. However, per our phone conversation, I agreed to accommodate this situation, by allowing the fire inspector to do a preliminary rough-in inspection of the bathrooms only, using the plans dated 8/23/07, which is the version you emailed to me and you indicated was being used onsite. You indicated that the installed piping in these areas matches those plans, and there appears to be no modification in those areas required by our two reviews. The inspection will be limited only to the bathroom areas that will have hard ceilings which need to be installed at this point in time. The remainder of the system will remain exposed until it can be inspected after approved plans are issued. Since you cannot schedule an inspection at this time, we verbally arranged for the inspection to be on Monday morning, 10/22. Troy will email his inspection comments and I will paste them into the permit Activities to document the special inspection.
|
Telephone call | | | 10/17/2007 | | DONE |
|
|
|
(copy of email) Randy, Confirming our telephone discussion today of Shiloh's request for approval of a light hazard sprinkler design in the drive-through, area below the 2nd floor of the building. We determined this is not a canopy and therefore is required to be sprinklered according to its actual use. You agreed to provide a letter from the building owner detailing the use of this area. A light hazard design can only be used where there is no storage of combustible and no vehicle parking. The owner must be willing to agree to post "No Storage" and "No Parking" signs and enforce those restrictions, to allow a light hazard design. An OH1 design is required for parking areas and for moderate storage. We will await receipt of such documentation prior to approval of the sprinkler plans. Regards, Sam
|
Plan resubmittals received | | | 9/24/2007 | | |
|
|
|
received fire spr app, & "5" binders with plans including FP-1 through FP-1--plans put on fire shelf
|
Miscellaneous action | | | 8/30/2007 | | DONE |
|
|
|
Approved early start request.
|
Application received | | | 7/19/2007 | | |
|
|
|
|
Pending Assignment by SAM | 7/19/2007 | | | | |
|
|
|
|
Sprinkler Plan Check | 11/5/2007 | | | | FAIL |
|
|
|
These plans were denied due to lack of deign detail and minimum requirements not having been met.
Upon request, the denied set of plans may be retrieved from my office for salvage. The denied set will be maintained for 5 working days
|