Information based on query as of Tuesday, July 16, 2024.
Permit Information
Permit NumberFIR07-00637
StatusFinaled
Name SHILO AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER CO
Site Address 6651 W FRANKLIN RD
Project NameSW ID Advanced Care Hospital
Customer Number 
ePlanReview 
Description
11/19/07 Revised Work Scope:
During this review, the contractor submitted revised hydraulic cover sheets for area AF Loop 7 the Front Canopy. These plans were approved with those amendments / revisions date 11/19/07.
11/05/07 Revised Work Scope:
The scope now included Ord. Grp I hazard above the Ambulance Drive Through.
The Permitted Work Scope:
Under Ground Scope: The existing under-ground is noted to be an 8” circulating loop. Beginning from an existing 8” gate valve (Tapping Tee) at the property line, install a 6” piping run though a Post Indicating Valve and then out and up into the bldg riser room. The piping run consist of a 25’ + or – run of 6” C-900.
Overhead Scope: Beginning from the FF, AFF in side the Mechanical Room 1076 at the North East corner of this two story 50,275–ft/2 building, install a 4” pressure reducing back flow device and wet riser to serve through out the structure. Each floor shall be controlled separately. An anti-freeze system will serve throughout the non-heated areas.
The fire sprinkler system work shall comply with the IFC 2003, the attached review comments/conditions, as regulated by the Fire Chief. The review comments/conditions, permit and fire "Inspection Card" are required to be on site as a condition of this work, to provide witness of compliance verification of minimum code. This permit is attached to BLD07-00274. When tenant work affects fire sprinkler protection outside the permitted work area due to the installation of tenant-demising or new partition walls, the affected area sprinkler coverage outside the BLD permit will fall under the Fire Permit scope of work, to maintain the required fire protection within the fire sprinklered facility. The “Riser” and its supplies which include all appurtenances (including tamper, alarm and alarm monitoring) relating to the normal and correct function and integrity of this system will fall under the jurisdiction for code compliant verification.12/16/07 Revised Work Scope: As-Built
These plans were resubmitted due to changes in the field which affected the original design. The revisions noted as As-Built on each sheet are dated 12/07/07. As-built changes were noted as listed below.
Page FP1 –
1. The yard PIV has been eliminated because the riser room is a 1 hour rated room with an exterior exit.
2. The FDC has been relocated due to a planter wall that hid the FDC.
Page FP2 – has no changes
Page FP3 –
1. The 4” anti-freeze loop supply has been re-routed. It actually has been straightened out and 6-4” 90° Ells have been removed.
2. The elevator equipment room located between grid lines 11 & 14 at E2 has no ceiling. The sprinkler head has been changed from an upright head to an upright head on a sprig.
3. The elevator equipment room located between grid lines 5 & 7 at M has a ceiling. The sprinkler head has been changed from an upright head to a pendent head.
4. The Main at gridlines P & 3 has been re-routed so that it does not pass through the expanded electrical room.
Page FP4 –
1. At the top of the stairwells upright heads have been changed to pendent heads. These are located in the following locations:
a. Grid Lines 24 through 26 at B through B.5
b. Grid Lines 9 through 10 at A through B-5
c. Grid Lines 3 through 6 at U
Contact Information
See Activities list for contact information
Show Inspection Activities Only
DescriptionReceivedRequestedCompletedAM/PMDispositionAssigned To 
Case Summary  2/19/2008  
INSP-Final Inspection1/15/20081/16/20081/16/2008APASS
DetailsTroy Cobbley
Permit finaled
INSP-Final Inspection1/14/20081/15/20081/15/2008PFAIL
DetailsTroy Cobbley
Forward flush passed. To final the project the 1 1/4" branchline needs to be relocated around the electrical room.
INSP-Final Inspection1/14/20081/14/20081/15/2008PCANC
DetailsTroy Cobbley
Mike B is the contact. Thanks Phone #: ###-#### Internet Inspection Request from: Stan Beus
PLANS/APPL TAKEN TO FRONT DESK  12/18/2007 DONE
Inspection Record Card- Fire12/18/2007 12/18/2007 DONE
Telephone call  12/18/2007 DONE
tlk to lilly ###-#### that permit and fees are ready to be picked up
Permit Ready to Issue  12/18/2007 DONE
Issue and Print Permit  12/18/2007  
Sprinkler Plan Check12/10/2007 12/16/2007 PASS
Note: This was the 5th review of these plans. As-Built plans are approved by Bryan Johnson
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro12/13/200712/14/200712/14/2007APASS
DetailsTroy Cobbley
The second floor hydro test passed. The second floor sprinkler piping is ok to cover. I spent an extended amount of time pointing out fire proofing that had not been repaired. There were also loose hanger rings. I stated again that resubmittals would be required.
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro12/11/200712/13/200712/13/2007ACANC
DetailsTroy Cobbley
Per Nate this is for a hydro test which can not be done due to a head leaking that needs replaced.
Plan resubmittals received  12/10/2007  
received "5" sets of plans with app & submittal sheet with each plan--put plans on fire shelf
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in12/5/200712/6/200712/7/2007PPASS
DetailsTroy Cobbley
The first floor sprinkler piping can be covered.
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in11/30/200712/4/200712/4/2007AFAIL
DetailsTroy Cobbley
The rooms where the sprinkler piping is ok to cover in area #1 are marked on the plans. The other areas of area #1 still need fire proofing patched where all trades are destroying the fire patching.
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro11/28/200711/30/200711/30/2007APART
DetailsTroy Cobbley
The hydro test for the first floor passed. This does not include either of the canopies. I stopped the rough-in inspection for the first floor due to wire still being attached to the sprinkler piping, lose hangers, missing hangers, earthquake bracing not being installed and no patching of the fire proofing has been done yet. Also the sprinkler plans will need to be resubmitted to show the changes which include the deletion of the PIV.
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro11/28/200711/30/200711/28/2007ACANC
DetailsTroy Cobbley
Leroy is the contact. Thanks Phone #: ###-#### Internet Inspection Request from: Stan Beus Inspection cancelled from web by: Stan Beus
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in11/26/200711/27/200711/27/2007PPART
DetailsTroy Cobbley
The north canopy piping has been corrected and can be covered. The west canopy piping has not been corrected and can not be covered. The remaining hard lids on the second floor can be covered. These were the only three items inspected today.
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in11/21/200711/23/200711/23/2007APART
DetailsTroy Cobbley
See the city approved plans for locations where piping is ok to cover above the remaining hardlid areas. The exterior canopies are ok to cover except where shown on the plans. This is due to the pipe sizes installed not matching what is shown on the plans. The fire sprinkler contractor did not show the pipe size on the piping in question on the north canopy. Since the fire sprinkler contractor did not provide the pipe sizing and center to center length I had to look at the hydraulic calculations to verify this pipe size. The calculstions state the piping between nodes 12 and 87 to be 2". The fire sprinkler contractor has installed both 2" and 1 1/2" pipe between these two node points. The exterior piping in the west canopy is installed as 2 1/2" but is shown as 2" on the plans. Again installation does not match the city approved plans. I also noted many locations where electrical wiring has been attached to the sprinkler piping and to the all thread rods. The fire sprinkler contractor needs to resubmit correct as-built plans or install this project per approved plans. Also there were locations that the sprinkler plans show pendant sprinklers but per the general contractor there will be no ceilings and only the structure above. These changes shall also be shown on a corrected set of city approved as-builts.
PLANS/APPL TAKEN TO FRONT DESK  11/21/2007  
Inspection Record Card- Fire11/21/2007 11/21/2007 DONE
Inspection Record Card- Fire11/21/2007 11/21/2007 DONE
Permit Ready to Issue  11/21/2007  
Issue and Print Permit  11/21/2007 DONE
Sprinkler Plan Check11/5/2007 11/19/2007 PASS
Note
This was the 4th review. Plans are approved by Bryan Johnson

Miscellaneous action  10/24/2007 DONE
Decision reached on contractor's requrest for Light Haz sprinkler design for ambulance drive through. Design shall be OH1, as indicated on the 10/10/07 plan review comments. This is consistent with NFPA 13 based on automobile parking, and with the actual design of other Southwest ID Advanced Care facilities and similar healthcare facilities built throughout the Treasure Valley by other sprinkler contractors.
Plan resubmittals received  10/24/2007  
received fire app (1) sheet & "5" sets of plans- plans put on fire shelf
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in10/22/200710/22/200710/22/2007PPASS
Partial roughin inspection of selected bathrooms only on 1st and 2nd floor, see onsite plans for restrooms marked in red as okay for cover. I spoke to general contractor for patching spray on fireproofing at sprinkler hanger locations.
Miscellaneous action  10/22/2007 DONE
Received emailed letter from Architect dated 10/17/07 indicating the drive-through will only be used for pickup and delivery of patients, no parking of amublance or other vehicles. Doc attached.
Sprinkler Plan Check  10/17/2007 FAIL
These plans were denied based on calculation errors and lack of details requested in initial review. Upon request, the denied set may be retrieved from my office for salvage. Denied plans will be maintained for 5 business days.
Telephone call  10/17/2007 DONE
Called Randy Knudson to discuss Shiloh's request for a rough-in inspection prior to "issued" plans. Copy of email: Randy,
The problem with doing rough-in inspections at this time, is that there are no approved plans to inspect to and there is not a way to schedule an inspection until the permit is in the "issued" status. However, per our phone conversation, I agreed to accommodate this situation, by allowing the fire inspector to do a preliminary rough-in inspection of the bathrooms only, using the plans dated 8/23/07, which is the version you emailed to me and you indicated was being used onsite. You indicated that the installed piping in these areas matches those plans, and there appears to be no modification in those areas required by our two reviews. The inspection will be limited only to the bathroom areas that will have hard ceilings which need to be installed at this point in time. The remainder of the system will remain exposed until it can be inspected after approved plans are issued. Since you cannot schedule an inspection at this time, we verbally arranged for the inspection to be on Monday morning, 10/22. Troy will email his inspection comments and I will paste them into the permit Activities to document the special inspection.
Telephone call  10/17/2007 DONE
(copy of email) Randy, Confirming our telephone discussion today of Shiloh's request for approval of a light hazard sprinkler design in the drive-through, area below the 2nd floor of the building. We determined this is not a canopy and therefore is required to be sprinklered according to its actual use. You agreed to provide a letter from the building owner detailing the use of this area. A light hazard design can only be used where there is no storage of combustible and no vehicle parking. The owner must be willing to agree to post "No Storage" and "No Parking" signs and enforce those restrictions, to allow a light hazard design. An OH1 design is required for parking areas and for moderate storage. We will await receipt of such documentation prior to approval of the sprinkler plans. Regards, Sam
Plan resubmittals received  9/24/2007  
received fire spr app, & "5" binders with plans including FP-1 through FP-1--plans put on fire shelf
Miscellaneous action  8/30/2007 DONE
Approved early start request.
Application received  7/19/2007  
Pending Assignment by SAM7/19/2007    
Sprinkler Plan Check11/5/2007   FAIL
These plans were denied due to lack of deign detail and minimum requirements not having been met.
Upon request, the denied set of plans may be retrieved from my office for salvage. The denied set will be maintained for 5 working days