Miscellaneous action | | | 3/10/2010 | | DONE |
|
|
|
Sent to records for scanning.
|
INSP-Final Inspection | 3/9/2010 | 3/9/2010 | 3/9/2010 | P | PASS |
Troy Cobbley
|
|
|
Permit finaled.
|
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro | 4/7/2009 | 4/7/2009 | 4/7/2009 | P | CANC |
Troy Cobbley
|
|
|
permit finaled
|
INSP-Alarm Testing | 1/30/2009 | 2/2/2009 | 2/2/2009 | A | PASS |
Troy Cobbley
|
|
|
Permit finaled. Storage was below 20'-0" at this time. Owner has been notified by the sprinkler contractor that 18" minimum clearance is required from the top of the storage to the sprinkler heads.
|
Telephone call | | | 1/30/2009 | | DONE |
|
|
|
John Warnick at Commerical Fire Protection sent a fax in regards to the design parameters for the Costo Freezer TI. The fax indicate a minimum design requirement of .37/2000. Commercial Fire based their design on .45/2000. I told him the deisgn was obviously adequate however there shall be NO storage above 20'. John said he spoke with the manger of Costo and told them not to store over 20'. The ceiling in the freezer is 21'-6" Please, see attached letter.
|
INSP-Final Inspection | 1/23/2009 | 1/26/2009 | 1/26/2009 | A | FAIL |
Troy Cobbley
|
|
|
The sprinkler system as installed matched the plans. The problem is that the plans state the maximum storage height is not to exceed 17'0" and it does. The storage appears to be less than 18" from the sprinkler pendants. The product storage needs to be permanantly reduced or the storage height needs to be addressed on the city approved plans.
|
Issue and Print Permit | | | 12/19/2008 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
PLANS/APPL TAKEN TO FRONT DESK | | | 12/16/2008 | | |
Cathy Brown
|
|
|
|
Permit Ready to Issue | | | 12/16/2008 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Telephone call | | | 12/16/2008 | | |
Cathy Brown
|
|
|
tlk to commercial fire at ###-#### that permit and fees are ready to be picked up
|
Inspection Record Card- Fire | 12/16/2008 | | 12/16/2008 | | DONE |
Cathy Brown
|
|
|
|
Sprinkler Plan Check | 11/12/2008 | | 12/14/2008 | | PASS |
|
|
|
Note
This was the third review of these plans. A total of 20 heads with in the remote area were affected as a result of this resubmittal.
These plans were approved with conditions.
|
Sprinkler Plan Check | 11/12/2008 | | 11/20/2008 | | NR |
|
|
|
Costco Freezer Up-Grade FIR08-00636 ON HOLD
These plans are on hold pending further information from the contractor. (See Notes 1-2)
1. Existing system impairment and fire safety plan.
2. A complete Key Plan description.
|
Plan resubmittals received | | | 11/12/2008 | | |
|
|
|
Rec'd plan mod, three copies of transmittal letter, application, submittal info ,and sheet FP-1 & FP-2- also one copy of orginal sheets; taken to fire review
|
Sprinkler Plan Check | 10/13/2008 | | 10/22/2008 | | FAIL |
|
|
|
These plans were denied denied based on an existing system design conflict of the storage arrangement and density provided. In addition, the existing heads installed in the freezer are not listed for the present storage arrangement.
Upon request, the denied set of plans may be retrieved from my office for salvage. The denied set of plans will be maintained for five working days.
|
Sprinkler Plan Check | 10/13/2008 | | 10/21/2008 | | NR |
|
|
|
These plans are on hold pending further information from the sprinkler contractor. Note that the existing heads in the freezer area are not listed for storage over 12'-0" with a 5.6 K-factor. Please select an alternate listed head with a minimum of an 8.0K-factor as required by NFPA, as the storage is known to be Class II, 70%rack stored to 17'-0".
12.6* Storage Applications.
12.6.1 For storage applications with densities of 0.20 gpm/ft2 (8.2 mm/min) or less, standard response sprinklers with a K-factor of K-5.6 (80) or larger shall be permitted.
12.6.2 For general storage applications, rack storage, rubber tire storage, roll paper storage, and baled cotton storage being protected with upright and pendent spray sprinklers with required densities of greater than 0.20 gpm/ft2 to 0.34 gpm/ft2 (8.2 mm/min to 13.9 mm/min), standard response sprinklers with a nominal K-factor of K-8.0 (115) or larger shall be used.
12.6.3 For general storage applications, rack storage, rubber tire storage, roll paper storage, and baled cotton storage being protected with upright and pendent spray sprinklers with required densities greater than 0.34 gpm/ft2 (13.9 mm/min), standard response spray sprinklers with a K-factor of K-11.2 (161) or larger that are listed for storage applications shall be used.
12.6.4* Unless the requirements of 12.6.5 are met, the requirements of 12.6.2 and 12.6.3 shall not apply to modifications to existing storage application systems, using sprinklers with K-factors of K-8.0 (115) or less.
*Please provide proof that the existing piping above the freezer area will support the design density for High Piled Storage or .45/2000 ft/2 as noted on Sheet FP-9. Note that the plans submitted do not clearly represent actual pipe size and type.
Your immediate response is required.
|
Plan resubmittals received | | | 10/13/2008 | | |
Sam Rogers
|
|
|
Rec;d 3 copies of applcation, 3 copies submittal info, and 3 copies of pages HPS, FP1, FP2, FP3, FP4, FP5. FP6, FP7. FP8, AND FP9; taken to fire review
|
Sprinkler Plan Check | 9/18/2008 | | 9/23/2008 | | FAIL |
|
|
|
These plans were denied due to lack on required information. The contractor has chosen not to collect the denies set of plans.
Bryan Johnson
|
Early Start | | | 9/18/2008 | | FAIL |
|
|
|
Early Start request received and declined based on lack of information on proposed storage height and arrangements. Follwing email sent to Commercial Fire: "Brook,
Brian looked briefly at the plans and determined that information on the proposed storage arrangement and heights is missing. We cannot give you approval to start any installation work until we are reasonably assured the plans reflect the anticipated storage arrangement.
Regards,
Sam
"
|
Sprinkler Plan Check | | | 9/18/2008 | | FAIL |
|
|
|
Per Bryan Johnson email 9/18/08: This project has been put on hold until the anticipated storage arrangement and height is disclosed to the plans examiner.
Bryan Johnson
|
Application received | | | 9/10/2008 | | |
|
|
|
|
Case Summary | | | 9/10/2008 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Pending Assignment by SAM | 9/10/2008 | | | | |
|
|
|
|