Information based on query as of Wednesday, July 17, 2024.
Permit Information
Permit NumberFIR08-00830
StatusFinaled
Name TREASURE VALLEY FIRE PROTECTION
Site Address 4890 N CLOVERDALE RD
Project NameBoise Retiremnent Bldg A
Customer NumberBLDG A - MIDDDLE SECTION
ePlanReview 
Description
(BOISE RETIREMENT RESIDENCE - BLDG A - CENTER SECTION) To construct a new 26 unit (plus manager & co-manager units) 37,512 square foot, three story, I-1, non state licensed, residential care, assisted living assisted living facility, where all residence will be capable of responding to an emergency situation without physical assistance. This building will contain the supporting occupancies such as assembly areas, dining area, associated kitchen, and an atrium all per approved plans. This building to be fully fire sprinklered with an NPFA 13 system for area increase and the atrium area. This building section is separated from the west end (Section C) and the east end (Section B) by 2-hr. fire walls. Note: This project was reviewed by ICC for energy, structural, nonstructural and accessibility requirements for code compliance. (25 units are less than 800 sq.ft. and 3 units are more than 800 sq.ft.)
Contact Information
See Activities list for contact information
Show Inspection Activities Only
DescriptionReceivedRequestedCompletedAM/PMDispositionAssigned To 
Miscellaneous action  1/5/2010 DONE
DetailsTim Frost
Drawings sent for scanning.
INSP-Final Inspection10/20/200910/20/200910/20/2009PPASS
DetailsTroy Cobbley
Permit is finaled. The engineers letter ok'd the quick responce heads at the top of the atrium.
INSP-Final Inspection10/12/200910/13/200910/13/2009AFAIL
DetailsTroy Cobbley
Todays inspection was for the relocation of the sprinkler pendants around the first floor atrium soffit. Their installation does not match the original engineered drawings but per the general contractor a revised letter is being written up that covers the new installation. I inspected the hangers and piping. The piping can be covered.
INSP-Final Inspection10/2/200910/5/200910/5/2009AFAIL
DetailsTroy Cobbley
The issue with the atrium sprinkler protection is waiting to be resolved. The backflow preventor that is installed is not what was submitted on and signage needs to be provided for the control valves. Per Lonnie the outside alarm bell will be changed out and the signage provided on it as well.
INSP-Final Inspection9/30/200910/1/200910/1/2009AFAIL
DetailsTroy Cobbley
The forward flush passed and the interconnections to the fire alarm panel passed inspection. This included tripping both of the dry pipe systems. I noted that the air compressor on the first floor dry system does not match plan. I was unable to verify all of the typical finish items on a final inspection due to time constraints. Lonnie will call back in when the air compressor issue has been addressed.
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro9/22/20099/23/20099/23/2009APASS
DetailsTroy Cobbley
The 24 hour air test on the first floor dry pipe riser passed test.
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in9/22/20099/22/20099/22/2009PPASS
DetailsTroy Cobbley
The 24 hour air test on the first floor dry riser was started at 11:00am with 44psi on the guage.
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro9/16/20099/17/20099/17/2009APART
DetailsForrest France
First floor wet system hydrostatic test passed.
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro9/16/20099/16/20099/17/2009PPART
DetailsForrest France
For hydrostatic testing at the 1st floor wet system.
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro9/15/20099/16/20099/17/2009APART
DetailsForrest France
Overhead hydrostatic test of the 6" feed main to the second floor manifolds passed.
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro9/14/20099/14/20099/14/2009PCANC
DetailsTroy Cobbley
Lonnie Phone #: ###-####
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro9/3/20099/4/20099/4/2009PPART
DetailsTroy Cobbley
The dry pipe riser on the first floor failed the 24 hour air test. The dry pipe riser on the second floor passed the 24 hour air test.
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro9/2/20099/3/20099/3/2009APART
DetailsTroy Cobbley
The first floor dry system and the two second floor wet systems passed the overhead hydro tests. The others failed.
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro9/2/20099/2/20099/2/2009PPASS
DetailsTroy Cobbley
The sprinkler piping at the first, second and third floor core areas are ok for cover.
INSP-Final Inspection8/6/20098/6/20098/6/2009PFAIL
DetailsTroy Cobbley
Todays inspection was for work completed on the first floor residence rooms, which all are. The corridors are not yet complete.
INSP-Final Inspection8/5/20098/5/20098/5/2009AFAIL
DetailsTroy Cobbley
Todays inspection was for completed sprinkler work for the second and third floor areas of this building. The only areas not complete are the third floor Atrium and the second floor corridor.
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro7/14/20097/14/20097/14/2009PPASS
DetailsTroy Cobbley
The area under the stairs at the mechanical room/riser room can be covered.
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro7/9/20097/9/20097/9/2009PPASS
DetailsTroy Cobbley
The sprinkler piping in the mechanical room/riser room is ok to cover.
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro7/6/20097/7/20097/7/2009APASS
DetailsTroy Cobbley
The remaining first floor dining area on the north side is ok for cover. The insulation has been installed.
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro7/1/20097/2/20097/2/2009APASS
DetailsTroy Cobbley
The piping located in the dining area can be covered. The insulation has been installed.
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro6/26/20096/29/20096/29/2009APASS
DetailsTroy Cobbley
Kitchen area insulation installed. Piping okay to cover.
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro6/23/20096/24/20096/24/2009ACANC
DetailsTroy Cobbley
This was a duplicate inspection which was already performed yesterday.
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro6/23/20096/23/20096/23/2009PPASS
DetailsTroy Cobbley
The insulation has been installed on the second floor and is satifactory for cover.
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in6/15/20096/16/20096/16/2009APART
DetailsTroy Cobbley
See the city approved plans for items corrected and items still needing addressed. The north canopy was inspected today. It appears upright coverage has been deleted in one location where it is required unless a code based reason can be given.
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro6/12/20096/15/20096/16/2009PPART
DetailsTroy Cobbley
See the city approved plans for deficiancies that need corrected on the first and second floors.
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro6/11/20096/12/20096/12/2009APART
DetailsTroy Cobbley
3rd floor piping okay to cover except for 1" vertical risers in exterior walls. Insulation needs to be verified prior to covering. One sidewall head was overspaced. Proper spacing will be verified at final.
Plan assigned to (Tim)6/3/2009 6/8/2009 DONE
DetailsTim Frost
6/8/2009 14:09:20 TRF - activity updated through activity FIRA22 from case FIR08-00830.
Sprinkler Plan Check6/8/2009 6/8/2009 PASS
DetailsTim Frost
Please, see attached comments.
There are NO annotations on the plans.
PLANS/APPL TAKEN TO FRONT DESK  6/8/2009 DONE
DetailsTim Frost
Telephone call  6/8/2009 DONE
Details
t/c w jeff anderson at ###-#### - permit (plan mod) ready and fees given
Permit Ready to Issue  6/8/2009 DONE
Details
Issue and Print Permit  6/8/2009 DONE
DetailsSarah Schafer
Plan resubmittals received  6/3/2009 DONE
received 3 resubmittal plans & applications sent to Tim F. in fire
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro5/28/20096/1/20096/1/2009APASS
DetailsTroy Cobbley
The first and second floor corridors of this building, Area A, are ok to cover.
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro5/14/20095/15/20095/14/2009APASS
DetailsTroy Cobbley
The sprinkler piping in the first and second floor corridors can be covered with insulation.
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro4/15/20094/17/20094/17/2009APASS
DetailsTroy Cobbley
The only item inspected today was the south canopy as marked on the city approved plans. As-bults were provided, dated and signed for this area, that will need to be resubmitted for approval to the plan reviewer. The sprinkler piping as marked in this area is ok to cover.
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in1/14/20091/14/20091/14/2009PDONE
DetailsTroy Cobbley
This was a conference. Bill the fitter is going to re-position the sidewall heads that are located in the closet so that the water will not be blocked by items being stored. I stated that I would not require resubmittals for this but would require resubmittals for the branchline relocations and re-routing of piping that may be required to avoid routing pipe in the exterior walls.
Miscellaneous action  1/12/2009 DONE
Sent email to Jeff Anderson

These look fine. The brace is at 45 degrees instead of the 90 degrees from the previous submittal. All material are called out and quantified. Please, keep in mind that this calculation is not interchangeable with using AFCON materials. If you wish to use AFCON materials then another calculation using AFCON materials will be required. One for the lateral and one for the longitudinal. Thanks for your cooperation and time.
Sprinkler Plan Check1/12/2009 1/12/2009 PASS
DetailsTim Frost
See attached comments
There are NO annotations on the plans.
PLANS/APPL TAKEN TO FRONT DESK  1/12/2009 DONE
Inspection Record Card- Fire1/12/2009 1/12/2009 DONE
Details
Telephone call  1/12/2009 DONE
Details
t/c w damaris at ###-#### - permit ready and fees given
Permit Ready to Issue  1/12/2009 DONE
Details
Issue and Print Permit  1/12/2009 DONE
Telephone call  1/8/2009 DONE
Received a message from Jeff wanting to know why I would not approved the seimisc hanger calculations. I left him a detailed message explaining what was wrong ( 90 degree, no longitudinal, and no pipe filled out in bracing summary)
Telephone call  1/7/2009 DONE
Spoke with Philiph, resolved some issues/questions. Told him I was holding, up final review until I receive sesmic bracing calculations. I asked them to be faxed to me.
Plan resubmittals received  1/5/2009 DONE
Telephone call  12/30/2008 DONE
Details
t/c w jeff anderson at ###-#### - permit denied and ready to be picked up
Sprinkler Plan Check12/29/2008 12/29/2008 FAIL
DetailsTim Frost
Please, see attached comments.
There are NO annotations on the plans.
Telephone call  12/29/2008 DONE
As per our phone conversation of today 12-29-08 disregard the 3000 sf hydraulic most remote area requirement that is in my review in any areas that residential sprinklers are used. This is based on the commentary that we discussed in the NFPA 13 Handbook on page 507.
Application received  12/15/2008  
Pending Assignment by SAM12/15/2008 12/15/2008