Information based on query as of Wednesday, July 17, 2024.
Permit Information
Permit NumberFIR10-00514
StatusFinaled
Name DEBEST FIRE PROTECTION
Site Address 370 N BENJAMIN LN
Project NameAda County Paramedics
Customer Number 
ePlanReviewNo
Description
The Fire Sprinkler Scope of work consists of providing new wet pipe systems to a two floor existing building. Each floor is control by a separate riser. New 6” C-900 underground piping will supply the new riser through a new a 4” wall piv and 4” backflow preventer. Each floor is designed as a tree. The bottom floor has 2½” main and 1½” lines. The second floor has 3” main and 1½” lines. Quick response sprinklers will be used throughout.


Building Department Scope:

(Ada County Paramedics T.I.) Remodel an existing 15,791sq. ft., 2 story office building proposed for use as Ada County Paramedic office and training facility. Building to be fully sprinklered with a fire alarm system as part of remodel. Sprinkler system is used for allowable area increase and added story for compliance of "A3" occupancy in 2 story building. Addition of 555 sq. ft. 2 story enclosed stair /vestibule / entry and new interior elevator and elevator equipment room. Work includes select demolition at exterior and throughout interior of both floors. Construct new walls to create offices, training rooms, reception, common use and support areas; interior finishes, millwork, electrical, mechanical, plumbing, sprinkler and alarm work, all per reviewed plans. Post maximum occupant load sign of 107, Room 110; 100, Room 11; and 217 when room combined into one room for assembly) drs
Contact Information
See Activities list for contact information
Show Inspection Activities Only
DescriptionReceivedRequestedCompletedAM/PMDispositionAssigned To 
Miscellaneous action  6/8/2011 DONE
Sent to records for scanning.
INSP-Final Inspection4/14/20114/15/20114/15/2011APASS
DetailsTroy Cobbley
Permit finaled. The forward flush also passed
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro4/5/20114/7/20114/7/2011APASS
DetailsTroy Cobbley
The overhead hydro test passed
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro3/29/20113/30/20113/30/2011PCANC
DetailsTroy Cobbley
Wrong permit/building called in for inspection.
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in3/23/20113/24/20113/24/2011APASS
DetailsForrest France
Passed one sprinkler in riser room as a rough in.

Steph Phone #: ###-####
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in3/18/20113/22/20113/22/2011APASS
DetailsTroy Cobbley
The sprinkler piping on the second floor is ok to cover except at the new lobby area.
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in3/15/20113/16/20113/16/2011APASS
DetailsTroy Cobbley
The first floor sprinkler piping is ok to cover except at the Lobby area which has not been completed yet.
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in3/1/20113/2/20113/2/2011PPASS
DetailsTroy Cobbley
Todays inspection was just for the rough-in on the second floor mains, branchlines and arm overs. Additional inspections will be required once the ceiling grid has been installed to verify final pendant sprinkler spacing.
INSP-Conference2/23/20112/24/20112/24/2011ACANC
DetailsTroy Cobbley
Duplicate inspection
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in2/23/20112/24/20112/24/2011APASS
DetailsTroy Cobbley
Todays inspection was verifying that the combustible concealed spaces around the building have been reduced in size to be less than 160 cubic feet each as allowed in the 2009 NFPA 13. All of the spaces that were spot check on the outside of the building were 120 cubic feet or less and the second floor spaces were around 80 cubic feet. I gave the ok to re-cover the concealed spaces.
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in2/23/20112/23/20112/23/2011PCANC
DetailsTroy Cobbley
To be rescheduled for tomorrow morning at 10am when all of the fire stopping has been completed per Jeff.
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in2/22/20112/23/20112/23/2011APART
DetailsForrest France
jeff - ###-####
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in2/9/20112/10/20112/10/2011APASS
DetailsTroy Cobbley
Todays inspection was for cover in the hard lid areas. The piping in the hardlid areas marked "ok" is ok for cover.
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in2/8/20112/9/20112/9/2011ACANC
DetailsTroy Cobbley
Cancelled due to time constraints. Message was left on voice mail.
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in2/1/20112/1/20112/2/2011PCANC
DetailsTroy Cobbley
Wrong permit number called in.
INSP-Conference1/13/20111/14/20111/14/2011ADONE
DetailsTroy Cobbley
Jeff and I met and discussed the combustible concealed space/soffit that encircles the entire building. This space will need to meet NFPA 13 Chapter 8 requirements such as sprinkler protection or filled with non-combustible insulation.
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in1/3/20111/4/20111/4/2011APASS
DetailsTroy Cobbley
The insulation, in the second floor joist spaces, can be covered.
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in12/22/201012/27/201012/27/2010APART
DetailsTroy Cobbley
Todays inspection was for the rough-in on the first floor. The piping as installed is ok except that resubmittals are required showing the pipe routing changes and the combustible construction. The combustible construction includes wall caps, beams, TJI joists, spaces under stairs, wall bracing and mechanical shafts. Per the plans the mechanical shafts are concrete. There is the possibility that the TJI's located on the first floor near the remote area will drive the need for the hydraulic calculations to utilize the 3,000sq ft remote area for the first floor. Fire sprinkler protection will need to be provided for both the first and second floors due to the combustibles or requirements out of NFPA 13 Chapter 8 will need to be met if possible. No piping is to be covered and no spaces are to be covered until these issues are resolved.
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in12/9/201012/10/201012/10/2010AFAIL
DetailsTroy Cobbley
The insulation in the combustible concealed space does not meet 2010 NFPA 13 - 8.15.1.2.17. Blow-in insulation has been used not the batt insulation as required.
Issue and Print Permit  11/22/2010 DONE
DetailsBarbara Stitt
Plan assigned to (Tim)11/10/2010 11/18/2010 DONE
DetailsTim Frost
Telephone call  11/18/2010 DONE
Spoke to Randy Bowron
Asked him to send me new sesimic calculations that were accurate. I also need to know if a space required sprinklers. I told him that I would do an approved as noted to expedite this project. However, I explained due to time constraints that I will be unable to do this in the future. The items mentioned above were in my initial review. They were NOT addressed and ignored in the resubmittal.
Sprinkler Plan Check11/18/2010 11/18/2010 PASS
DetailsTim Frost
Please, see attached comments.
There are NO annotations on the plans.
PLANS/APPL TAKEN TO FRONT DESK  11/18/2010 DONE
DetailsTim Frost
Inspection Record Card- Fire11/18/2010 11/18/2010 DONE
DetailsPatricia Smith
Telephone call  11/18/2010 DONE
t/c w aleshia - permit ready and fees given
Permit Ready to Issue  11/18/2010 DONE
Details
Plan resubmittals received  11/10/2010  
DetailsBarbara Stitt
Plan assigned to (Tim)10/15/2010 10/28/2010 DONE
DetailsTim Frost
Sprinkler Plan Check10/19/2010 10/19/2010 FAIL
DetailsTim Frost
Please, see attached comments.
There are NO annotations on the plans.
1st review completed  10/19/2010 DONE
DetailsTim Frost
Telephone call  10/19/2010 DONE
DetailsBarbara Stitt
Left message for Keith Dillworth that plans were denied so they need picked up and resubmitted on 10-19-10 @ 2:52pm
Case Summary  10/15/2010 DONE
Application received  10/15/2010