Boise PDS Online - FIR15-00018

Information based on query as of Wednesday, July 17, 2024.

Permit Information

Permit Number	FIR15-00018
Status	Finaled
Name	PEAK ALARM
Site Address	222 S AUTO DR
Project Name	Boise Collision Repair Center
Customer Number
ePlanReview	No
Description	Addition of 5 new duct smoke detectors to an existing fire alarm system. Associated with building permit BLD14-00948.

Contact Information

See Activities list for contact information

Permit Details Project Related Cases Activities Conditions Parcel Fees Valuation Documents Permit Summary Report

Show Inspection Activities Only

Description

Received

Requested

Completed

AM/PM

Disposition

Assigned To

Case Summary

6/6/2016

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Case Summary

2/5/2015

Name:
Title:
Phone:

INSP-Final Inspection

1/29/2015

1/30/2015

PASS

Name:	Troy Cobbley
Title:	FIRE INSPECTOR
Phone:	794-9483

Troy Cobbley

Permit finaled

INSP-Final Inspection

1/28/2015

1/29/2015

FAIL

Name:	Troy Cobbley
Title:	FIRE INSPECTOR
Phone:	794-9483

Troy Cobbley

Outside alarm bell did not ring upon activation of the dry pipe system.

Permit Ready to Issue

1/27/2015

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Issue and Print Permit

1/27/2015

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Issue and Print Permit

1/27/2015

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Inspection Record Card- Fire

1/27/2015

DONE

Name:	Brittany Hill
Title:	PERMIT TECHNICIAN
Phone:	384-3802

Brittany Hill

Telephone call

1/26/2015

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Received a call from the mechanical engineer of the project. He wanted to confirm that duct detectors are not being required. I did confirm that. He indicated that he will issue a notice to the architect and general contractor syaing that the ones installed on the supply dictwork can be removed.

Miscellaneous action

1/23/2015

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Email sent to applicant to notify them that 2 copies of the resubmittal are required - not one and the they will need to provide an additional on prior to review.

Miscellaneous action

1/23/2015

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Applicant is delivering a second copy of the plan mod application.

Alarm Plan Check

1/23/2015

PASS

Name:	Lee G Meredith
Title:	FIRE ALARM REVIEWER
Phone:	208-608-7112

Lee G Meredith

PLANS TAKEN FRONT DESK ALARM

1/23/2015

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Quick permit plan mod submittal approved with no review comments. Taken to front desk for processing.

Telephone call

1/23/2015

Name:
Title:
Phone:

called Mary-left voicemail that permit is ready, remaining fees, and that we need a 2nd copy of application

Plan resubmittals received

1/23/2015

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Two copies of Application and Documents.

Plan resubmittals received

1/22/2015

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

received one copy of application resubmittal

Telephone call

1/21/2015

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Jason of Peak Alarm called to confirm that duct detectors were not required. I told him that they are not. He said that a new sprinkler riser was being added that is to be monitored. I told him to resubmit this under the same permit number as a plan modification.

Plan assigned to (Lee)

1/12/2015

1/16/2015

DONE

Name:	Lee G Meredith
Title:	FIRE ALARM REVIEWER
Phone:	208-608-7112

Lee G Meredith

1st review completed

1/16/2015

PASS

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Alarm Plan Check

1/16/2015

PASS

Name:	Lee G Meredith
Title:	FIRE ALARM REVIEWER
Phone:	208-608-7112

Lee G Meredith

PLANS TAKEN FRONT DESK ALARM

1/16/2015

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Plans approved with review comments, drawing notation and requirements. Taken to front desk for processing.

Permit Ready to Issue

1/16/2015

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

Telephone call

1/16/2015

DONE

Name:	Candy A. Nichols
Title:	SEWER RATING
Phone:	384-3802

Candy A. Nichols

called Jason Petty to let know permit is ready and how much is owed

Miscellaneous action

1/13/2015

DONE

Name:
Title:
Phone:

I emailed Mary Froemke to let her know the the duct detectors shown on the drawing are not required and can be removed. This is based on IMC section 606.2 exception. I also informed her that if the mechanical engineer insists on having duct detection, the sensors will need to be installed on the return ducts instead of the supply ducts based on IMC section 606 . Mary responded to state that the detectors would still be installed on the supply side. She asked if they needed to be monitored. I responded stating that if the detectors were installed, it was to be on the retun side Per IMC or not at all and that if installed, they were required to be monitored Per NFPA 72..

Application received

1/12/2015

Name:
Title:
Phone: