INSP-Final Inspection | 9/20/2016 | 9/23/2016 | 9/23/2016 | P | PASS |
Jim Page
|
|
|
Final fire sprinkler inspection passed/complete, hydrostatic test was completed on 06MAY2016
|
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in | 5/31/2016 | 5/31/2016 | 5/31/2016 | A | PART |
Jim Page
|
|
|
Tenting Inspection complete for overhead fire sprinkler piping in the 3rd level attic spaces as well as 4th level fire sprinkler piping, area's inspected approved for cover with exception to the breeze-ways, the piping crossing the breeze-way an all floors cannot be covered until an approved method is installed to keep this section of piping from freezing
|
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro | 5/5/2016 | 5/6/2016 | 5/6/2016 | A | PART |
Jim Page
|
|
|
Rough to cover inspection complete, 1st level overhead fire sprinkler piping approved for cover with exception to the fire sprinkler piping crossing the breeze-way, the piping crossing the breeze-way an all floors cannot be covered until an approved method is installed to keep this section of piping from freezing. 2nd level overhead fire sprinkler piping approved for cover with exception to breeze-way, 3rd level piping approved for cover will exception to breeze-way and piping that is located in attic space, the piping in th attic space needs to be tented with insulation, once tenting inspection is complete this piping can be covered, 4th level rough in inspection complete, all piping on 4th level cannot be covered until tenting inspection is complete. Any overhead fire sprinkler piping that is covered before tenting inspection will have covering material removed for the inspection.
|
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro | 5/5/2016 | 5/5/2016 | 5/5/2016 | P | CANC |
Jim Page
|
|
|
Please call Jake when you are heading out, thanks! Phone #: ###-#### >> Inspection requested via web by Anthony Minichiello Inspection cancelled from web by: Anthony Minichiello
|
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro | 4/25/2016 | 4/29/2016 | 4/28/2016 | P | CANC |
Jim Page
|
|
|
Please call when you are headed out. Thanks! Phone #: ###-#### >> Inspection requested via web by Anthony Minichiello Inspection cancelled from web by: Anthony Minichiello
|
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro | 4/20/2016 | 4/26/2016 | 4/25/2016 | P | CANC |
Jim Page
|
|
|
Please call Jake when you are heading out. Thanks! Phone #: ###-#### >> Inspection requested via web by Anthony Minichiello Inspection cancelled from web by: Anthony Minichiello
|
Miscellaneous action | | | 4/14/2016 | | DONE |
|
|
|
The FD is ok with dry standpipes but required
Locking KNOX FDC caps
One FDC connection for the standpipes and system.
I knew the code section was in NFPA 14 but since IFC overrules and it was not mention in IFC. Well I just wanted to make sure.
The IFC comment could always be made to happen. (Make them supply a heated chase and or heat tracing.) That is what I meant by huge expense.
It is going to be difficult to tie the FDC together. The regular FDC is at the side of the building. The SP FDC is in the middle. However, anything is possible. I will call them and see how much blow back I get.
In retrospect, I should have been more thorough on my question to you. Sorry.
Cordially,
Tim Frost, S.E.T.
Tim Frost, S.E.T.
Fire Sprinkler Plans Examiner
Planning & Development Services
Phone: ###-####
E-Mail: tfrost@cityofboise.org
150 North Capitol Boulevard
Boise, ID. 83701
From: Ronald Johnson
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 3:37 PM
To: Tim Frost
Subject: RE: Kensington
Tim,
First a couple code sections.
905.8 Dry standpipes. Dry standpipes shall not be installed.
Exception: Where subject to freezing and in accordance
with NFPA 14.
NFPA 14
5.4.1.1* Class I standpipe systems shall be permitted to be automatic
dry, automatic wet, semiautomatic dry, manual dry, or
manual wet in buildings not classified as high-rise buildings.
I just talked to Romeo about this to see how he’s handled it before. He hasn’t come across this exact scenario, nor have I. We are ok with the concept with the addition of a couple items.
1. Locking Knox caps on FDC’s.
2. Shared FDC with sprinklers to prevent us from having to supply an FDC and a standpipe connection.
Do you think that is doable?
Thanks,
Ron Johnson
Division Chief – Assistant Fire Marshal
###-#### -Office
###-#### -Cell
rjohnson@cityofboise.org
333 N. Mark Stall Place
Boise, ID 83704
From: Tim Frost
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 1:47 PM
To: Ronald Johnson
Subject: Kensington
We have talked several times about this project. However, just to make sure, you are ok with dry manual standpipes in these NPFA 13R apartment buildings; correct? They are not specifically referenced in IFC. The only reference for dry manual appears to be parking garages and basement. There really is any better way of doing them without a huge exspense.
905.3 Required Installations.
Standpipe systems shall be installed where required by Sections 905.3.1 through 905.3.8. Standpipe systems are allowed to be combined with automatic sprinkler
systems.
Exception: Standpipe systems are not required in Group R-3 occupancies.
905.3.1 Height.
Class III standpipe systems shall be installed throughout buildings where the floor level of the highest story is located more than 30 feet (9144 mm) above the
lowest level of the fire department vehicle access, or where the floor level of the lowest story is located more than 30 feet (9144 mm) below the highest level of
fire department vehicle access.
Exceptions:
1. Class I standpipes are allowed in buildings equipped throughout with an automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1 or
903.3.1.2.
2. Class I manual standpipes are allowed in open parking garages where the highest floor is located not more than 150 feet (45 720 mm) above the
lowest level of fire department vehicle access.
3. Class I manual dry standpipes are allowed in open parking garages that are subject to freezing temperatures, provided that the hose connections are
located as required for Class II standpipes in accordance with Section 905.5.
4. Class I standpipes are allowed in basements equipped throughout with an automatic sprinkler system.
5. In determining the lowest level of fire department vehicle access, it shall not be required to consider:
5.1. Recessed loading docks for four vehicles or less, and
5.2. Conditions where topography makes access from the fire
|
Sprinkler Plan Check | 4/12/2016 | | 4/12/2016 | | PASS |
Tim Frost
|
|
|
Please, see attached comments.
|
PLANS/APPL TAKEN TO FRONT DESK | | | 4/12/2016 | | DONE |
Tim Frost
|
|
|
|
Permit Ready to Issue | | | 4/12/2016 | | DONE |
Christina Prado
|
|
|
|
CHANGE STATUS TO (ISS) | | | 4/12/2016 | | DONE |
Christina Prado
|
|
|
|
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro | 3/10/2016 | 3/10/2016 | 3/10/2016 | P | PASS |
Jim Page
|
|
|
Underground rough to cover inspection complete, underground supply approved for cover. Hydrostatic test (200psi for 2 hours)for underground passed/complete.
|
Permit Ready to Issue | | | 2/2/2016 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Issue and Print Permit | | | 2/2/2016 | | DONE |
|
|
|
|
Inspection Record Card- Fire | 2/2/2016 | | 2/2/2016 | | DONE |
Christina Prado
|
|
|
|
Sprinkler Plan Check | 1/29/2016 | | 1/29/2016 | | PASS |
Tim Frost
|
|
|
Please, see attached comments.
|
PLANS/APPL TAKEN TO FRONT DESK | | | 1/29/2016 | | DONE |
Tim Frost
|
|
|
|
Sprinkler Plan Check | 1/15/2016 | | 1/15/2016 | | FAIL |
Tim Frost
|
|
|
|
1st review completed | | | 1/15/2016 | | FAIL |
Tim Frost
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous action | | | 1/15/2016 | | DONE |
Tim Frost
|
|
|
Emailed contractor in regards to failed review.
|
Intake Approval | | | 1/14/2016 | | PASS |
|
|
|
|
Plan assigned to (Tim) | 1/14/2016 | | 1/14/2016 | | DONE |
Tim Frost
|
|
|
|
Application received | | | 1/12/2016 | | DONE |
|
|
|
Application submitted via PDS Online on Jan 12 2016 10:13AM
|