INSP-Final Inspection | 11/12/2010 | 11/15/2010 | 11/15/2010 | A | PASS |
Troy Cobbley
|
|
|
Permit finaled. Bill to provide test papers and sticker on outside alarm bell as discussed for tomorrows life safety inspection.
|
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro | 11/12/2010 | 11/15/2010 | 11/15/2010 | A | PASS |
Troy Cobbley
|
|
|
The remaining overhead hydro tests passed.
|
INSP-Final Inspection | 11/12/2010 | 11/12/2010 | 11/12/2010 | P | CANC |
Troy Cobbley
|
|
|
Project is not ready for a final inspection. See corrections required entered under the rough-in sprinkler inspection request.
|
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro | 11/12/2010 | 11/12/2010 | 11/12/2010 | P | FAIL |
Troy Cobbley
|
|
|
Forrest France worked Thursday 11/11/10 to perform hydro tests on the new sprinkler systems. This inspection has not been logged in under a separate inspection due to the plan status being in the Rev status due to an additional resubmittal for plan modifications. Forrest found that systems #1, #2 and #3 had been pumped up but the system header and FDC piping had not. The fitter stated that these items would be tested the following day. Forrest started the two hour testing and upon his return found that a mechanical tee had failed under pressure on system #2. So on 11/11/10 systems #1 and #3 passed hydro.
Todays (11/12/10) hydro test was for the header and FDC piping. System #2 had not been set back up for testing. After starting the hydro testing Bill and I started the inspection to verify the corrected items on the latest plan modifications. Everything was completed except 14 sprinkler heads along the south wall did not get relocated as required on the plan modifications and two upright heads were still exceeding their half spacing in the upper level Storage Room. So a total of 16 sprinkler heads needed to be relocated. The other correction items including the installation of insulation in the joist channels had been completed. Due to the 16 heads needing relocated, the sprinkler systems where these heads are located, will need to be re-hydro tested. At this point it was agreed to end the header and FDC hydro test and go ahead and perform the forward flow verification for the backflow preventor which passed easily out of a single 2 1/2" outlet. In conclusion to finish this sprinkler permit, the 16 relocated heads need to be finished, hydro testing performed and the verification of fire alarm interconnections.
|
INSP-Final Inspection | 11/3/2010 | 11/4/2010 | 11/4/2010 | P | FAIL |
Troy Cobbley
|
|
|
Todays inspection was actually just an underground flush which passed inspection. This project is not ready for a final inspection at this time. See previous correction items noted.
|
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in | 11/2/2010 | 11/3/2010 | 11/3/2010 | P | FAIL |
Troy Cobbley
|
|
|
Plans need to be resubmitted showing all piping changes and additional sprinkler heads. Revised hydraulic calculations are required showing the routing changes and additional fitting added due to structural members. Resubmittals were required per the approved plans if additional fittings or piping were provided. See the city approved plans for locations of deficiencies as marked in red. Two items not marked on the plans but discussed with Bill were the clearance for the main penatrations through the block walls and a letter from a structural engineer or manufacturer addressing/approving the drilling of the structural members to mount the siesmic bracing.
|
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro | 11/2/2010 | 11/3/2010 | 11/3/2010 | P | FAIL |
Troy Cobbley
|
|
|
Duplicate inspection for a hydro. See previous notes.
|
INSP-Supply line flush | 11/2/2010 | 11/3/2010 | 11/3/2010 | A | PART |
Troy Cobbley
|
|
|
The underground hydro test passed. Could not perform above ground hydro tests or flush the underground supply due to not having the main water supply turned on..
|
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in | 11/1/2010 | 11/2/2010 | 11/2/2010 | A | PASS |
Troy Cobbley
|
|
|
The underground supply piping is ok to cover.
|
INSP-Conference | 10/18/2010 | 10/18/2010 | 10/19/2010 | P | DONE |
Troy Cobbley
|
|
|
Bill and I went over earthquake bracing. I told him if the earthquaking did not match plans then resubmittals of the seismic calculations would be required. We also talked about possible z-purlin manufacture approval for earthquake attachment.
|