Information based on query as of Wednesday, June 26, 2024.
Permit Information
Permit NumberFIR15-00822
StatusFinaled
Name SHILO AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER CO
Site Address 11196 W FAIRVIEW AVE
Project NameLHM Subaru
Customer Number 
ePlanReviewYes
Description
[Larry H Miller Subaru Boise]
The fire sprinkler scope of work consists of protecting a new automobile dealership. An 8” underground supplies a 4” backflow preventer. The system is primarily designed as a 3” x 2 ½” x 1 ¼” grid. There are several tree sections supplied from the grid. The majority of the building is designed as OH II.

All storage to be less than 12’high except for rubber and plastic storage, which is to be less than 5’ high

The underground permit was approved under FIR15-00791

(Larry H. Miller Boise Subaru) Permit to construct a new 39,000 square foot two-story automobile dealership. The second floor is 2,098 square feet. This building is fire sprinklered with a NFPA 13 system for Unlimited Area Building provisions (Section 507.4 / 2012 IBC). Work to include: new foundation, new exterior walls, new roof construction, new interior walls to define spaces as noted on approved plans, new electrical, new mechanical, new plumbing, new interior finishes, new equipment, and related site improvements. This building is required to be fully fire sprinklered in accordance with NFPA 13 and alarmed in accordance with NFPA 72. **TLW**
Contact Information
See Activities list for contact information
Show All Activities
DescriptionReceivedRequestedCompletedAM/PMDispositionAssigned To 
INSP-Final Inspection7/23/20187/24/20187/24/2018APASS
DetailsTroy Cobbley
Permit finaled

Phone #: ###-#### Inspection requested via web by Stan Beus
INSP-Final Inspection7/20/20187/20/20187/20/2018PFAIL
DetailsTroy Cobbley
I need to verify as-builts match installation, both vents on the fire pump fuel tank need to vent to the exterior of the building as per NFPA 20 and IFC requirements.

Mike Martin is the contact for this final inspection. Thank you for your help. Phone #: ###-#### Inspection requested via web by Stan Beus
INSP-Final Inspection7/16/20187/20/20187/20/2018AFAIL
DetailsTroy Cobbley
Pump commissioning passed. Need as-builts of the fire pump assembly as discussed, need approval from the fire dept on the fuel tank venting. Need signage on the fire pump room door. Need all of the fire alarm interconnections tested.

Phone #: ###-#### Inspection requested via web by Stan Beus
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro7/16/20187/17/20187/17/2018PPASS
DetailsTroy Cobbley
Above ground hydro test for the fire pump piping passed.
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in7/10/20187/11/20187/11/2018PPASS
DetailsTroy Cobbley
Most corrections have been made and are marked "ok" on the plans. Still need earthquaking at the 6" existing riser and at the risers in the fire pump room.

Phone #: ###-#### Inspection requested via web by Stan Beus
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in7/3/20187/3/20187/3/2018PPART
DetailsTroy Cobbley
Todays inspection was for the bulk mains. Missing branchline restraints, missing heads in Fire Pump Room, missing earthquake bracing, missing clearance at CMU walls.

Tile can be installed in Service Bay but will need to be left out at the earthquake bracing locations.

Phone #: ###-#### Inspection requested via web by Stan Beus
INSP-Conference8/15/20168/15/20168/15/2016PDONE
DetailsTroy Cobbley
Per Assistant Chief Ron Johnson the Temporary Occupancy is to continue until directed otherwise. Included is the email dated 8/15/16 giving current status.



From: Ronald Johnson
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 10:04 AM
To: Quinton Boyer
Cc: Tom Easton ; Randy Bowron ; Mike Bierman ; Tim Frost ; Scott Arellano ; Romeo Gervais
Subject: Fire Flow for Larry Miller Subaru



Mr. Boyer,



I met Suez Water field techs last week to witness a flow test at the fire hydrant at the northwest corner of Larry Miller Subaru. The results of the flow test are as follows.



Outlet: 4.5”, Discharge Coefficient .9

Static: 57

Pitot: 26

Residual: 45

Actual Flow: 2772 gpm

Flow at 20psi: 5092 gpm



The available fire flow as calculated using the flow test does not support a properly functioning fire sprinkler system as designed. I discussed these results with Suez and inquired if there would be any stability increase in the system in the near future. There are no plans for any improvements that would stabilize or increase the pressure in this area in the foreseeable future. Unfortunately, the sprinkler system for Larry Miller Subaru was designed using a fire flow that does not reflect the significant daily drop in pressure. This daily drop in pressure lasts several hours and is expected to occur at least 3.5 to 4 months of the year. If a fire were to occur in the building, the sprinkler system may not be sufficient to keep it in check or extinguish the fire during several hours of the day. I know this is very inconvenient and will likely be expensive to resolve, so I am open to a reasonable timeline for repairs. Please respond with a plan and proposed timeline. I am willing to discuss this and answer questions you and the owner may have by phone or in person. Would you mind forwarding owner contact information to me so I can contact them?



Regards,




cid:image001.jpg@01CE20C9.F3E72450

Ron Johnson

Division Chief – Assistant Fire Marshal

INSP-Conference7/8/20167/8/20167/8/2016ACANC
DetailsTroy Cobbley
60 psi on the guage this morning
INSP-Conference7/6/20167/7/20167/7/2016ADONE
DetailsTroy Cobbley
Pressure was 64psi this morning
INSP-Conference7/6/20167/6/20167/6/2016ADONE
DetailsTroy Cobbley
Pressure was 62psi this morning
INSP-Conference7/5/20167/5/20167/5/2016ADONE
DetailsTroy Cobbley
Reading on the guage this morning was 70psi
INSP-Conference7/1/20167/1/20167/1/2016ADONE
DetailsTroy Cobbley
57psi on the guage this morning
INSP-Conference6/30/20166/30/20166/30/2016ADONE
DetailsTroy Cobbley
Pressure this morning was 69psi
INSP-Conference6/29/20166/29/20166/29/2016ADONE
DetailsTroy Cobbley
57psi on the guage at 7:00 am this morning
INSP-Conference6/28/20166/28/20166/28/2016APASS
DetailsTroy Cobbley
I witnessed 64psi at the base of riser.
INSP-Conference6/28/20166/28/20166/28/2016ADONE
DetailsTroy Cobbley
This inspection actually occured on 6/27/16 where I witnessed pressure at the base of riser at 59psi
INSP-Final Inspection6/8/20166/8/20166/8/2016APART
DetailsTroy Cobbley
Per the Fire Marshal, a TCO can be issued for the building permit (BLD15-01869) for the next 30 days. The static pressure at the base of the fire riser will need to be monitored and recorded over the next 30 days by the general contractor. These readings will be evaluated by the Fire Marshal at the end of the 30 days to determine if fire sprinkler system design changes will be necessary under (FIR15-00822) to accommodate the actual water supply available onsite.
INSP-Final Inspection6/6/20166/7/20166/7/2016APART
DetailsTroy Cobbley
I stopped at the project site three times today to verify static pressure on the underground supply line. At 7:00am the pressure was at 61psi, at 9:00am the pressure was at 71psi and at 1:00pm the pressure was at 74 psi. I contacted the project superintendant and the fire sprinkler contractor and let them know that I could not sign off until directed by my supervisor.

Mike is the contact. Thanks. Phone #: ###-#### Inspection requested via web by Stan Beus
INSP-Conference6/6/20166/6/20166/6/2016PDONE
DetailsTroy Cobbley
“Met Mike Bierman onsite to evaluate pressure at base of riser assembly. Pressure gauge indicated 73psi on one riser gauge and 78 psi on the other riser pressure gauge. We agreed to check the pressure once again the following morning to verify that the minimum require base of riser (BOR) pressure is accurate per system design. Final sign off can occur with this follow up pending verification.”
INSP-Final Inspection6/2/20166/3/20166/3/2016ACANC
DetailsTroy Cobbley
Shilo has provided info on corrected gpm requirements that will need to be approved by Tim Frost for the forward flush
INSP-Final Inspection5/27/20165/31/20165/31/2016AFAIL
DetailsTroy Cobbley
Forward flow test passed with a temporary outlet to the exterior but it needs to be permanent as per discussion. Pressure at riser indicated 56psi. Plans and calculations submitted require a minimum of 75psi at base of riser.
INSP-Final Inspection5/25/20165/25/20165/25/2016PFAIL
DetailsTroy Cobbley
The interconnects with the fire alarm system tested ok. Forward flush failed.
INSP-Final Inspection5/23/20165/24/20165/24/2016PCANC
DetailsTroy Cobbley
Mark is the contact. Thanks. Phone #: ###-#### Inspection requested via web by Stan Beus
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro5/20/20165/23/20165/23/2016APASS
DetailsTroy Cobbley
Overhead hydro test passed.
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro5/20/20165/20/20165/20/2016PCANC
DetailsTroy Cobbley
Mark Jensen is the contact - ###-#### - would like a Hydro test this afternoon.
Thank you Phone #: ###-#### >> Inspection requested via web by Kay Haney Inspection cancelled from web by: Stan Beus
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in5/13/20165/16/20165/16/2016APASS
DetailsTroy Cobbley
Remaining piping is ok to cover. Missing one pendant in the west service bay.
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in5/10/20165/11/20165/11/2016APASS
DetailsTroy Cobbley
See the city approved plans for additional areas where piping can be covered. I noted pendants are overspaced in the Electrical Room.
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in5/3/20165/3/20165/3/2016PPASS
DetailsTroy Cobbley
See the city approved plans for new area where the piping is ok to cover clouded and marked with todays date.
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in4/28/20164/29/20164/29/2016APASS
DetailsTroy Cobbley
See the city approved plans for the ShowRoom area where piping has been clouded in red that is ok to cover.
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in4/6/20164/6/20164/6/2016PPASS
DetailsTroy Cobbley
See the city approved plans for piping marked "ok" whre piping above hard lids can be covered.
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in3/28/20163/29/20163/29/2016PPART
DetailsTroy Cobbley
See the city approved plans for locations where the sprinkler piping can be covered above the hardlids. Also plan modifications will again be required due to additional fittings and an elevation change that has not been included on the latest plans. The elevation change and the additional fittings will effect the hydraulic calculations and will need to be verified through the plan review process. Also at several locations where the piping passes through CMU walls and rises up through the floor the hole size is not large enough to meet NFPA 13. The holes will need to be larger or flexible couplings will need to be utilized as per NFPA 13. For the most part the sprinkler rough-in is passed except for the items noted above. I will need verification that the wood used in several locations is fire treaded or upright protection will be required.
INSP-Supply line flush3/21/20163/23/20163/23/2016PPASS
DetailsTroy Cobbley
Underground flush passed.
INSP-Sprinkler Rough-in/Hydro3/21/20163/22/20163/22/2016PPART
DetailsTroy Cobbley
Underground hydro test passed. Overhead rough-in failed due to the approved plans not matching the installation such as riser nipples installed where none are shown. Also missing branch line restraints. Plan modifications are required showing all piping changes and the additional fittings in the mains and branchlines.
INSP-Conference8/15/20168/15/2016 P